Emilio Nava vs Yoshihito Nishioka — Miami Masters Qualifying Round 2

Miami Masters · ATP · Qualifying Round 2
Emilio Nava
USA
Emilio Nava
#91ATP
1704ELO
1621Hard ELO
$533kYTD
$2.1MCAREER
24 yrs · 185 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLWWWWWWW
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 18 March 2024
hard
Yoshihito Nishioka
JPN2
Yoshihito Nishioka
#177ATP
1689ELO
1659Hard ELO
$42kYTD
$7.5MCAREER
30 yrs · 170 cm · Left-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLLLWWLLW
Nava E.
7-5 7-6
Nishioka Y.
Nava E.
7782
Nishioka Y.
5660

Emilio Nava defeated Yoshihito Nishioka 7-5 7-6 in the Miami Masters qualifying round 2 on hard. The result followed the form book — Emilio Nava came in ranked #91, defending last year's round of 64.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Nava E.serving85% hold

wins 66% of points on serve vs Nishioka Y.

Nishioka Y.serving82% hold

wins 64% of points on serve vs Nava E.

Even serve battle

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Serve & return on hard

Nava E.Nishioka Y.
39
Serve
—
21
Return
—

Per-surface Serve / Return Rating (0–100, percentile within the hard field, opponent-adjusted over 52 weeks). About

Statistics

This season
Nava E.Nishioka Y.
1st serve in·Even
63%
63%
1st serve points won·Slight edge
73%
68%
2nd serve points won·Even
50%
54%
Service points won·Even
64%
62%
Return points won·Even
37%
37%
Break points saved·Slight edge
64%
59%
Aces / match·Dominant
7.7
2.6
Double faults / match·Dominant
3.0
1.4

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (190 vs 99). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Nava E.Nishioka Y.
Clutch Rating·Dominant
52
84
Break points saved·Even
94
95
Break points won·Dominant
17
59
Deciding sets·Slight edge
89
98
Tiebreaks·Dominant
23
97

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Nava E.
6.4
Marginal edgeUmpiry Score
Nishioka Y.
6.6
Marginal edgeUmpiry Score
Form & Matchup
4.5Hard Elo 1621
Surface ELO
5.5+38 Hard Elo edge
5.1Overall Elo 1704
ELO gap
4.9Overall Elo 1689
0.0No prior meetings
H2H
10.0
7.0
Surface form
3.9
Win streak
0.0
Fatigue & Travel
4.5
Minutes 14d
8.2
4.0
3-set count
7.0
8.0
Prev. match
4.0
6.5
Country comfort
5.6
Context
6.0
Defending pts
6.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Nava E.Nishioka Y.
Freshness·
96
—

Nava E.: 14 days rest · 1 match (14d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Mediumbalanced pace
SlowFast
Weather
30°CDrizzle
Wind 16 km/hHumidity 61%
Q2
Kopriva V.[21]
Wolf J.[11]
6-31-66-4
Seyboth Wild T.[1]
Grenier H.
6-36-4
Kovacevic A.[9]
Bergs Z.[24]
7-626-2
Walton A.
Martinez P.[8]
3-66-26-3
Nakashima B.[10]
Atmane T.
1-1
Wong C.
Nagal S.[16]
3-66-17-5
Schwartzman D.[22]
Rinderknech A.[5]
3-66-37-61
Klein L.
Mensik J.[4]
7-667-5
Bautista Agut R.[13]
Virtanen O.
6-44-66-4
Nava E.
Nishioka Y.[2]
7-57-66
Vavassori A.
Vacherot V.
6-24-67-63
Mayot H.
Goffin D.[19]
7-656-2
Q1
Vavassori A.
Ajdukovic D.[23]
4-67-627-65
Wong C.
Gaston H.[6]
6-23-66-2
Grenier H.
Kokkinakis T.[14]
6-44-1
Goffin D.[19]
Mochizuki S.
7-646-2
Rinderknech A.[5]
Bicknell B.
6-46-4
Bergs Z.[24]
Meligeni Alves F.
2-66-16-4
Walton A.
Monteiro T.[20]
6-757-636-4
Mayot H.
Cazaux A.[3]
6-45-71-2
Schwartzman D.[22]
Svajda Z.
6-37-66
Klein L.
Paire B.[18]
6-17-62
Martinez P.[8]
Blockx A.
6-26-2
Nava E.
Halys Q.[17]
6-47-5
Nishioka Y.[2]
Ymer E.
6-37-64
Nagal S.[16]
Diallo G.
7-636-2
Mensik J.[4]
Nardi L.
6-46-2
Nakashima B.[10]
Mmoh M.
2-67-646-4
Kovacevic A.[9]
Kypson P.
6-27-65
Bautista Agut R.[13]
Hassan B.
7-676-4
Vacherot V.
Garin C.[7]
6-36-4
Seyboth Wild T.[1]
Dzumhur D.
6-46-2
Virtanen O.
Rodionov J.[12]
6-737-676-2
Atmane T.
Kukushkin M.
6-46-4
Kopriva V.[21]
Sakamoto R.
7-657-65
Wolf J.[11]
Spizzirri E.
6-37-5