Coleman Wong vs Sumit Nagal — Miami Masters Qualifying Round 2

Miami Masters · ATP · Qualifying Round 2
HKG
Coleman Wong
#111ATP
1602ELO
1593Hard ELO
$287kYTD
$1.2MCAREER
22 yrs · 191 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
WLLLLWLWLL
2 — 1
Sets
Monday, 18 March 2024
hard
Sumit Nagal
IND16
Sumit Nagal
#241ATP
1543ELO
1476Hard ELO
28 yrs · 178 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWWWWWLLLL
Wong C.
3-6 6-1 7-5
Nagal S.
Wong C.
3672
Nagal S.
6151

Coleman Wong defeated Sumit Nagal 3-6 6-1 7-5 in the Miami Masters qualifying round 2 on hard. The result followed the form book — Coleman Wong came in ranked #111.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Wong C.serving78% hold

wins 62% of points on serve vs Nagal S.

Nagal S.serving78% hold

wins 62% of points on serve vs Wong C.

Even serve battle

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Serve & return on hard

Wong C.Nagal S.
37
Serve
—
34
Return
—

Per-surface Serve / Return Rating (0–100, percentile within the hard field, opponent-adjusted over 52 weeks). About

Statistics

This season
Wong C.Nagal S.
1st serve in·Slight edge
61%
70%
1st serve points won·Slight edge
73%
64%
2nd serve points won·Even
50%
50%
Service points won·Even
64%
60%
Return points won·Even
37%
41%
Break points saved·Even
61%
59%
Aces / match·Dominant
8.4
1.5
Double faults / match·Even
2.2
2.0

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (178 vs 146). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Wong C.Nagal S.
Clutch Rating·Slight edge
43
33
Break points saved·Clear edge
91
69
Break points won·Dominant
5
35
Deciding sets·Dominant
43
16
Tiebreaks·Even
88
84

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Wong C.
6.7
Slight advantageUmpiry Score
Nagal S.
6.1
Even matchUmpiry Score
Form & Matchup
7.6+117 Hard Elo edge
Surface ELO
2.4Hard Elo 1476
7.6Overall Elo 1602
ELO gap
2.4Overall Elo 1543
0.0No prior meetings
H2H
10.0
5.9
Surface form
4.5
0.0
Win streak
Fatigue & Travel
9.0
Minutes 14d
7.0
7.0
3-set count
7.0
8.0
Prev. match
9.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Wong C.Nagal S.
Freshness·Even
100
96

Wong C.: 21 days rest · Nagal S.: 7 days rest · 1 match, 18 games (7d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Mediumbalanced pace
SlowFast
Weather
30°CDrizzle
Wind 16 km/hHumidity 61%
Q2
Kopriva V.[21]
Wolf J.[11]
6-31-66-4
Seyboth Wild T.[1]
Grenier H.
6-36-4
Kovacevic A.[9]
Bergs Z.[24]
7-626-2
Walton A.
Martinez P.[8]
3-66-26-3
Nakashima B.[10]
Atmane T.
1-1
Wong C.
Nagal S.[16]
3-66-17-5
Schwartzman D.[22]
Rinderknech A.[5]
3-66-37-61
Klein L.
Mensik J.[4]
7-667-5
Bautista Agut R.[13]
Virtanen O.
6-44-66-4
Nava E.
Nishioka Y.[2]
7-57-66
Vavassori A.
Vacherot V.
6-24-67-63
Mayot H.
Goffin D.[19]
7-656-2
Q1
Vavassori A.
Ajdukovic D.[23]
4-67-627-65
Wong C.
Gaston H.[6]
6-23-66-2
Grenier H.
Kokkinakis T.[14]
6-44-1
Goffin D.[19]
Mochizuki S.
7-646-2
Rinderknech A.[5]
Bicknell B.
6-46-4
Bergs Z.[24]
Meligeni Alves F.
2-66-16-4
Walton A.
Monteiro T.[20]
6-757-636-4
Mayot H.
Cazaux A.[3]
6-45-71-2
Schwartzman D.[22]
Svajda Z.
6-37-66
Klein L.
Paire B.[18]
6-17-62
Martinez P.[8]
Blockx A.
6-26-2
Nava E.
Halys Q.[17]
6-47-5
Nishioka Y.[2]
Ymer E.
6-37-64
Nagal S.[16]
Diallo G.
7-636-2
Mensik J.[4]
Nardi L.
6-46-2
Nakashima B.[10]
Mmoh M.
2-67-646-4
Kovacevic A.[9]
Kypson P.
6-27-65
Bautista Agut R.[13]
Hassan B.
7-676-4
Vacherot V.
Garin C.[7]
6-36-4
Seyboth Wild T.[1]
Dzumhur D.
6-46-2
Virtanen O.
Rodionov J.[12]
6-737-676-2
Atmane T.
Kukushkin M.
6-46-4
Kopriva V.[21]
Sakamoto R.
7-657-65
Wolf J.[11]
Spizzirri E.
6-37-5