Nick Hardt vs Facundo Mena — Merida CH Quarter-final

Merida CH · CHALLENGER · Quarter-final
Nick Hardt
DOM
Nick Hardt
#275ATP
1473ELO
1460Clay ELO
25 yrs · 185 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLWWWWWWW
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 18 March 2024
clay
Facundo Mena
ARG
Facundo Mena
#331ATP
1427ELO
1406Clay ELO
33 yrs · 183 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWWLLWLWLL
Hardt N.
6-4 6-4
Mena F.
Hardt N.
662
Mena F.
440

Nick Hardt defeated Facundo Mena 6-4 6-4 in the Merida CH quarter-final on clay.

Key context

  • Match story: Nick Hardt edged a tight contest from start to finish — 6–4 6–4.

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Hardt N.serving61% hold

wins 55% of points on serve vs Mena F.

Mena F.serving64% hold

wins 56% of points on serve vs Hardt N.

Baseline battle — serve is shaky, expect plenty of breaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Hardt N.Mena F.
1st serve in·Slight edge
65%
56%
1st serve points won·Slight edge
63%
71%
2nd serve points won·Even
47%
50%
Service points won·Slight edge
57%
62%
Return points won·Even
43%
39%
Break points saved·Slight edge
55%
61%
Aces / match·Dominant
1.5
5.8
Double faults / match·Clear edge
3.7
2.7

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (64 vs 120). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Hardt N.Mena F.
Clutch Rating·Clear edge
26
9
Break points saved·Clear edge
33
57
Break points won·Dominant
32
7
Deciding sets·Dominant
55
28
Tiebreaks·Dominant
48
10

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Hardt N.
3.7
Heavy underdogUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
  • Extended break: 63 days (−1.2)
Mena F.
4.6
Heavy underdogUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
  • Recent retirement (−1.5)
Form & Matchup
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
1.8
Surface form
5.2
0.0
Win streak
0.0
Fatigue & Travel
Minutes 14d
9.0
Prev. match
8.0
6.0
Surface transition
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Hardt N.Mena F.
Freshness·Clear edge
83
70

Hardt N.: 5 days rest · 2 matches, 57 games (7d) · Mena F.: 4 days rest · 3 matches, 88 games (7d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Mediumbalanced pace
SlowFast
Final
Boyer T.[3]
Ficovich J.[5]
7-666-2
Semi-finals
Boyer T.[3]
Hardt N.
6-16-4
Ficovich J.[5]
Dellien Velasco M.[4]
3-66-36-4
Quarter-finals
Boyer T.[3]
Popko D.[6]
1-66-26-3
Hardt N.
Mena F.
6-46-4
Dellien Velasco M.[4]
Cid R.
6-26-2
Ficovich J.[5]
Kozlov S.
7-666-2
R16
Popko D.[6]
Rybakov A.
W/O
Dellien Velasco M.[4]
Hernandez Serrano J.
6-13-66-3
Kozlov S.
Ejupovic E.
6-36-2
Hardt N.
Brumm J.
6-16-3
Mena F.
Boitan G.
7-636-3
Boyer T.[3]
Pacheco Mendez R.
6-17-5
Cid R.
Pichler D.
6-24-66-4
Ficovich J.[5]
Campana Lee G.
6-26-2
R32
Boitan G.
Martin D.
6-26-3
Kozlov S.
Gaio F.[2]
6-44-66-2
Hernandez Serrano J.
Rubio Fierros A.
6-47-64
Boyer T.[3]
Ayeni O.
6-06-3
Rybakov A.
Wessels L.
6-26-2
Popko D.[6]
Fancutt T.
6-47-5
Brumm J.
Crawford O.[1]
7-602-66-3
Hardt N.
Paz J.
6-43-66-3
Mena F.
Bellier A.[7]
6-46-1
Pacheco Mendez R.
Trotter J.
6-46-4
Cid R.
Mayo A.[8]
6-23-66-1
Pichler D.
Langmo C.
6-43-66-3
Dellien Velasco M.[4]
Baris O.
6-36-2
Ficovich J.[5]
Aguilera Guerrero E.
6-36-1
Campana Lee G.
Brown P.
6-716-46-3
Ejupovic E.
Hilderbrand T.
7-636-3