Emilio Nava vs Quentin Halys — Miami Masters Qualifying Round 1

Miami Masters · ATP · Qualifying Round 1
Emilio Nava
USA
Emilio Nava
#91ATP
1704ELO
1621Hard ELO
$533kYTD
$2.1MCAREER
24 yrs · 185 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLWWWWWWW
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 18 March 2024
hard
Quentin Halys
FRA17
Quentin Halys
#90ATP
1707ELO
1677Hard ELO
$694kYTD
$5.4MCAREER
29 yrs · 191 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLWLLLWWL
Nava E.
6-4 7-5
Halys Q.
Nava E.
672
Halys Q.
450

Emilio Nava defeated Quentin Halys 6-4 7-5 in the Miami Masters qualifying round 1 on hard. The upset overturned the form book — Quentin Halys came in ranked #90, defending last year's round of 16. Emilio Nava extended the head-to-head to 2–0.

Key context

Head to head

1–0
DateTournamentRoundSurfaceWinnerScore
2026-04-05Monte Carlo MastersQ1clayEmilio Nava6-4 6-4

Serve vs return

This season
Nava E.serving89% hold

wins 69% of points on serve vs Halys Q.

Halys Q.serving89% hold

wins 69% of points on serve vs Nava E.

Serve-dominated — both hold easily, expect tiebreaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Serve & return on hard

Nava E.Halys Q.
39
Serve
35
21
Return
26

Per-surface Serve / Return Rating (0–100, percentile within the hard field, opponent-adjusted over 52 weeks). About

Statistics

This season
Nava E.Halys Q.
1st serve in·Even
63%
59%
1st serve points won·Slight edge
73%
78%
2nd serve points won·Even
50%
51%
Service points won·Even
64%
67%
Return points won·Even
37%
34%
Break points saved·Even
64%
65%
Aces / match·Dominant
7.7
10.8
Double faults / match·Slight edge
3.0
3.6

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (190 vs 159). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Nava E.Halys Q.
Clutch Rating·Slight edge
52
57
Break points saved·Even
94
97
Break points won·Clear edge
17
4
Deciding sets·Clear edge
89
75
Tiebreaks·Dominant
23
91

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Nava E.
6.4
Marginal edgeUmpiry Score
Halys Q.
6.8
Slight advantageUmpiry Score
Form & Matchup
4.4Hard Elo 1621
Surface ELO
5.6+56 Hard Elo edge
5.2Overall Elo 1704
ELO gap
4.8Overall Elo 1707
0.0
H2H
10.0
7.0
Surface form
5.9
Fatigue & Travel
4.5
Minutes 14d
6.0
4.0
3-set count
4.0
8.0
Prev. match
9.0
6.5
Country comfort
Context
6.0
Defending pts
6.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Nava E.Halys Q.
Freshness·Even
96
92

Nava E.: 14 days rest · 1 match (14d) · Halys Q.: 11 days rest · 2 matches (14d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Mediumbalanced pace
SlowFast
Weather
30°CDrizzle
Wind 16 km/hHumidity 61%
Q2
Kopriva V.[21]
Wolf J.[11]
6-31-66-4
Seyboth Wild T.[1]
Grenier H.
6-36-4
Kovacevic A.[9]
Bergs Z.[24]
7-626-2
Walton A.
Martinez P.[8]
3-66-26-3
Nakashima B.[10]
Atmane T.
1-1
Wong C.
Nagal S.[16]
3-66-17-5
Schwartzman D.[22]
Rinderknech A.[5]
3-66-37-61
Klein L.
Mensik J.[4]
7-667-5
Bautista Agut R.[13]
Virtanen O.
6-44-66-4
Nava E.
Nishioka Y.[2]
7-57-66
Vavassori A.
Vacherot V.
6-24-67-63
Mayot H.
Goffin D.[19]
7-656-2
Q1
Vavassori A.
Ajdukovic D.[23]
4-67-627-65
Wong C.
Gaston H.[6]
6-23-66-2
Grenier H.
Kokkinakis T.[14]
6-44-1
Goffin D.[19]
Mochizuki S.
7-646-2
Rinderknech A.[5]
Bicknell B.
6-46-4
Bergs Z.[24]
Meligeni Alves F.
2-66-16-4
Walton A.
Monteiro T.[20]
6-757-636-4
Mayot H.
Cazaux A.[3]
6-45-71-2
Schwartzman D.[22]
Svajda Z.
6-37-66
Klein L.
Paire B.[18]
6-17-62
Martinez P.[8]
Blockx A.
6-26-2
Nava E.
Halys Q.[17]
6-47-5
Nishioka Y.[2]
Ymer E.
6-37-64
Nagal S.[16]
Diallo G.
7-636-2
Mensik J.[4]
Nardi L.
6-46-2
Nakashima B.[10]
Mmoh M.
2-67-646-4
Kovacevic A.[9]
Kypson P.
6-27-65
Bautista Agut R.[13]
Hassan B.
7-676-4
Vacherot V.
Garin C.[7]
6-36-4
Seyboth Wild T.[1]
Dzumhur D.
6-46-2
Virtanen O.
Rodionov J.[12]
6-737-676-2
Atmane T.
Kukushkin M.
6-46-4
Kopriva V.[21]
Sakamoto R.
7-657-65
Wolf J.[11]
Spizzirri E.
6-37-5