Martin Damm vs Zhizhen Zhang — Miami Masters Round of 128

Miami Masters · ATP · Round of 128
Martin Damm
USA
Martin Damm
#106ATP
1706ELO
1657Hard ELO
$338kYTD
$910kCAREER
22 yrs · 203 cm · Left-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLWWLWWWL
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 18 March 2024
hard
Zhizhen Zhang
CHN
Zhizhen Zhang
#161ATP
1682ELO
1642Hard ELO
$546kYTD
$4.6MCAREER
29 yrs · 193 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLWWWWWLWW
Damm M.
7-6 7-6
Zhang Z.
Damm M.
77772
Zhang Z.
62630

Martin Damm defeated Zhizhen Zhang 7-6 7-6 in the Miami Masters round of 128 on hard. The result followed the form book — Martin Damm came in ranked #106.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Damm M.serving94% hold

wins 74% of points on serve vs Zhang Z.

Zhang Z.serving91% hold

wins 71% of points on serve vs Damm M.

Serve-dominated — both hold easily, expect tiebreaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Serve & return on hard

Damm M.Zhang Z.
—
Serve
24
—
Return
0

Per-surface Serve / Return Rating (0–100, percentile within the hard field, opponent-adjusted over 52 weeks). About

Statistics

This season
Damm M.Zhang Z.
1st serve in·Even
61%
64%
1st serve points won·Slight edge
79%
73%
2nd serve points won·Even
51%
51%
Service points won·Even
68%
65%
Return points won·Even
33%
33%
Break points saved·Slight edge
66%
60%
Aces / match·Dominant
12.6
7.7
Double faults / match·Dominant
4.2
2.0

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (105 vs 94). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Damm M.Zhang Z.
Clutch Rating·Dominant
26
56
Break points saved·Even
93
94
Break points won·Clear edge
1
14
Deciding sets·Dominant
5
91
Tiebreaks·Dominant
84
43

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Damm M.
5.5
Slight disadvantageUmpiry Score
  • Extended break: 28 days (−0.3)
Zhang Z.
6.3
Marginal edgeUmpiry Score
Form & Matchup
4.9+15 Hard Elo edge
Surface ELO
5.1Hard Elo 1642
4.7Overall Elo 1706
ELO gap
5.3Overall Elo 1682
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
5.4
Surface form
4.0
Win streak
0.0
Fatigue & Travel
Minutes 14d
7.3
3-set count
4.0
7.0
Prev. match
7.0
4.0
Country comfort
Context
6.0
Defending pts
6.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Damm M.Zhang Z.
Freshness·Slight edge
89
100

Damm M.: 10 days rest · 2 matches (14d) · Zhang Z.: 19 days rest. Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Mediumbalanced pace
SlowFast
Weather
30°CDrizzle
Wind 16 km/hHumidity 61%
Final
Sinner J.[2]
Dimitrov G.[11]
6-36-1
Semi-finals
Dimitrov G.[11]
Zverev A.[4]
6-46-746-4
Sinner J.[2]
Medvedev D.[3]
6-16-2
Quarter-finals
Medvedev D.[3]
Jarry N.[22]
6-27-67
Dimitrov G.[11]
Alcaraz C.[1]
6-26-4
Sinner J.[2]
Machac T.
6-46-2
Zverev A.[4]
Marozsan F.
6-37-5
R16
Alcaraz C.[1]
Musetti L.[23]
6-36-3
Dimitrov G.[11]
Hurkacz H.[8]
3-66-37-63
Medvedev D.[3]
Koepfer D.
7-656-0
Marozsan F.
De Minaur A.[9]
6-40-66-1
Jarry N.[22]
Ruud C.[7]
7-636-3
Machac T.
Arnaldi M.
6-36-3
Sinner J.[2]
Oconnell C.
6-46-3
Zverev A.[4]
Khachanov K.[15]
6-16-4
R32
Alcaraz C.[1]
Monfils G.
6-26-4
Oconnell C.
Damm M.
7-657-65
Koepfer D.
Humbert U.[14]
3-66-46-3
Machac T.
Murray A.
5-77-57-65
Dimitrov G.[11]
Hanfmann Y.
6-16-0
Zverev A.[4]
Eubanks C.[31]
7-646-3
Khachanov K.[15]
Cerundolo F.[20]
6-15-77-65
De Minaur A.[9]
Struff J.[24]
7-636-4
Marozsan F.
Popyrin A.
7-56-3
Ruud C.[7]
Davidovich Fokina A.[27]
6-36-4
Jarry N.[22]
Seyboth Wild T.
6-717-56-3
Medvedev D.[3]
Norrie C.[30]
7-56-1
Arnaldi M.
Shapovalov D.
6-37-67
Sinner J.[2]
Griekspoor T.[25]
5-77-56-1
Hurkacz H.[8]
Korda S.[28]
7-656-756-3
Musetti L.[23]
Shelton B.[16]
6-47-65
R64
Alcaraz C.[1]
Carballes Baena R.
6-26-1
Monfils G.
Thompson J.[33]
6-736-16-2
Dimitrov G.[11]
Tabilo A.
6-757-656-2
Eubanks C.[31]
Evans D.
7-633-67-67
Cerundolo F.[20]
Ofner S.
7-626-726-1
Khachanov K.[15]
Djere L.
6-26-4
Struff J.[24]
Altmaier D.
6-36-3
Marozsan F.
Rune H.[6]
6-16-1
Ruud C.[7]
Van Assche L.
7-651-66-1
Davidovich Fokina A.[27]
Shang J.
6-37-5
Jarry N.[22]
Draper J.
7-654-67-62
Damm M.
Paul T.[13]
4-62-1
De Minaur A.[9]
Kwon S.
6-36-2
Shapovalov D.
Tsitsipas S.[10]
6-26-4
Machac T.
Rublev A.[5]
6-46-4
Oconnell C.
Tiafoe F.[21]
7-57-65
Hanfmann Y.
Mannarino A.[19]
3-67-616-4
Korda S.[28]
Bautista Agut R.
6-726-36-4
Hurkacz H.[8]
Shevchenko A.
6-46-726-3
Zverev A.[4]
Auger Aliassime F.
6-26-4
Popyrin A.
Lehecka J.[26]
6-46-4
Seyboth Wild T.
Fritz T.[12]
6-36-4
Humbert U.[14]
Van De Zandschulp B.
6-46-3
Koepfer D.
Baez S.[18]
6-36-2
Norrie C.[30]
Cobolli F.
7-56-746-2
Medvedev D.[3]
Fucsovics M.
6-46-2
Murray A.
Etcheverry T.[29]
7-606-3
Arnaldi M.
Bublik A.[17]
6-46-1
Griekspoor T.[25]
Michelsen A.
7-656-776-4
Sinner J.[2]
Vavassori A.
6-36-4
Shelton B.[16]
Landaluce M.
6-36-4
Musetti L.[23]
Safiullin R.
7-56-1
R128
Safiullin R.
Schwartzman D.
6-26-4
Bautista Agut R.
Nava E.
6-37-64
Damm M.
Zhang Z.
7-627-63
Michelsen A.
Klein L.
7-656-2
Fucsovics M.
Purcell M.
6-26-1
Cobolli F.
Nishioka Y.
1-66-16-4
Shevchenko A.
Galan D.
6-747-647-5
Carballes Baena R.
Vukic A.
7-626-3
Monfils G.
Lajovic D.
7-656-4
Landaluce M.
Munar J.
6-31-67-5
Tabilo A.
Nakashima B.
6-43-66-3
Hanfmann Y.
Ruusuvuori E.
6-44-66-4
Auger Aliassime F.
Walton A.
7-56-4
Evans D.
Sonego L.
1-66-36-4
Djere L.
Wong C.
7-57-63
Kwon S.
Muller A.
7-636-3
Altmaier D.
Mayot H.
6-27-5
Popyrin A.
Diaz Acosta F.
6-26-2
Marozsan F.
Kovacevic A.
6-36-2
Van Assche L.
Kotov P.
6-37-5
Shang J.
Kecmanovic M.
7-654-67-65
Draper J.
Daniel T.
6-36-2
Seyboth Wild T.
Borges N.
6-47-5
Koepfer D.
Giron M.
4-66-16-4
Machac T.
Blanch D.
6-46-2
Murray A.
Berrettini M.
4-66-36-4
Arnaldi M.
Fils A.
6-36-4
Shapovalov D.
Darderi L.
6-36-736-4
Oconnell C.
Kopriva V.
6-26-4
Vavassori A.
Cachin P.
6-26-2
Ofner S.
Nishikori K.
6-36-4
Van De Zandschulp B.
Hijikata R.
7-57-63