Roberto Cid vs David Pichler — Merida CH Round of 16

Merida CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 16
DOM
Roberto Cid
32 yrs · 193 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLLWLLLLW
2 — 1
Sets
Monday, 18 March 2024
clay
AUT
David Pichler
#1053ATP
30 yrs · 178 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWWLWLLLWL
Cid R.
6-2 4-6 6-4
Pichler D.
Cid R.
6462
Pichler D.
2641

Roberto Cid defeated David Pichler 6-2 4-6 6-4 in the Merida CH round of 16 on clay.

Key context

  • Match story: Roberto Cid closed it out in three sets, 6–2 4–6 6–4.

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Cid R.serving70% hold

wins 59% of points on serve vs Pichler D.

Pichler D.serving72% hold

wins 59% of points on serve vs Cid R.

Even serve battle

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Cid R.Pichler D.
1st serve in·Even
63%
62%
1st serve points won·Even
65%
69%
2nd serve points won·Even
47%
47%
Service points won·Even
59%
61%
Return points won·Even
38%
37%
Break points saved·Slight edge
49%
57%
Aces / match·Slight edge
2.2
3.5
Double faults / match·Even
2.8
2.8

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (33 vs 42). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Cid R.Pichler D.
Clutch Rating·Even
0
0
Break points saved·Clear edge
15
27
Break points won·Slight edge
26
17
Deciding sets·Slight edge
4
9
Tiebreaks·
1
—

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Cid R.
3.8
Heavy underdogUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
  • Extended break: 49 days (−0.7)
Pichler D.
6.0
Even matchUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Form & Matchup
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
0.7
Surface form
4.0
0.0Lost last 8
Win streak
0.0
Fatigue & Travel
Minutes 14d
8.4
Prev. match
9.0
6.0
Surface transition
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Conditions

Court speed
Mediumbalanced pace
SlowFast
Final
Boyer T.[3]
Ficovich J.[5]
7-666-2
Semi-finals
Boyer T.[3]
Hardt N.
6-16-4
Ficovich J.[5]
Dellien Velasco M.[4]
3-66-36-4
Quarter-finals
Boyer T.[3]
Popko D.[6]
1-66-26-3
Hardt N.
Mena F.
6-46-4
Dellien Velasco M.[4]
Cid R.
6-26-2
Ficovich J.[5]
Kozlov S.
7-666-2
R16
Popko D.[6]
Rybakov A.
W/O
Dellien Velasco M.[4]
Hernandez Serrano J.
6-13-66-3
Kozlov S.
Ejupovic E.
6-36-2
Hardt N.
Brumm J.
6-16-3
Mena F.
Boitan G.
7-636-3
Boyer T.[3]
Pacheco Mendez R.
6-17-5
Cid R.
Pichler D.
6-24-66-4
Ficovich J.[5]
Campana Lee G.
6-26-2
R32
Boitan G.
Martin D.
6-26-3
Kozlov S.
Gaio F.[2]
6-44-66-2
Hernandez Serrano J.
Rubio Fierros A.
6-47-64
Boyer T.[3]
Ayeni O.
6-06-3
Rybakov A.
Wessels L.
6-26-2
Popko D.[6]
Fancutt T.
6-47-5
Brumm J.
Crawford O.[1]
7-602-66-3
Hardt N.
Paz J.
6-43-66-3
Mena F.
Bellier A.[7]
6-46-1
Pacheco Mendez R.
Trotter J.
6-46-4
Cid R.
Mayo A.[8]
6-23-66-1
Pichler D.
Langmo C.
6-43-66-3
Dellien Velasco M.[4]
Baris O.
6-36-2
Ficovich J.[5]
Aguilera Guerrero E.
6-36-1
Campana Lee G.
Brown P.
6-716-46-3
Ejupovic E.
Hilderbrand T.
7-636-3