Jacob Brumm vs Oliver Crawford — Merida CH Round of 32

Merida CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 32
USA
Jacob Brumm
#1030ATP
27 yrs · 180 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLLWWWLLW
2 — 1
Sets
Monday, 18 March 2024
clay
Oliver Crawford
GBR1
Oliver Crawford
#235ATP
1444ELO
1373Clay ELO
27 yrs · 180 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
WLLWWWLWLL
Brumm J.
7-6 2-6 6-3
Crawford O.
Brumm J.
77262
Crawford O.
60631

Jacob Brumm defeated Oliver Crawford 7-6 2-6 6-3 in the Merida CH round of 32 on clay.

Key context

  • Match story: Jacob Brumm closed it out in three sets, 7–6 2–6 6–3.

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Brumm J.serving67% hold

wins 57% of points on serve vs Crawford O.

Crawford O.serving80% hold

wins 63% of points on serve vs Brumm J.

Serve advantage — Crawford O.

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Brumm J.Crawford O.
1st serve in·Slight edge
56%
61%
1st serve points won·Slight edge
64%
70%
2nd serve points won·Even
49%
53%
Service points won·Slight edge
57%
63%
Return points won·Even
36%
37%
Break points saved·Slight edge
49%
58%
Aces / match·Even
3.4
3.8
Double faults / match·Even
2.7
3.0

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (22 vs 87). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Brumm J.
5.8
Slight disadvantageUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Crawford O.
5.8
Slight disadvantageUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Form & Matchup
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
Surface form
4.4
0.0Lost last 6
Win streak
0.0Lost last 2
Fatigue & Travel
9.1
Minutes 14d
9.0
Prev. match
8.0
Surface transition
6.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Conditions

Court speed
Mediumbalanced pace
SlowFast
Final
Boyer T.[3]
Ficovich J.[5]
7-666-2
Semi-finals
Boyer T.[3]
Hardt N.
6-16-4
Ficovich J.[5]
Dellien Velasco M.[4]
3-66-36-4
Quarter-finals
Boyer T.[3]
Popko D.[6]
1-66-26-3
Hardt N.
Mena F.
6-46-4
Dellien Velasco M.[4]
Cid R.
6-26-2
Ficovich J.[5]
Kozlov S.
7-666-2
R16
Popko D.[6]
Rybakov A.
W/O
Dellien Velasco M.[4]
Hernandez Serrano J.
6-13-66-3
Kozlov S.
Ejupovic E.
6-36-2
Hardt N.
Brumm J.
6-16-3
Mena F.
Boitan G.
7-636-3
Boyer T.[3]
Pacheco Mendez R.
6-17-5
Cid R.
Pichler D.
6-24-66-4
Ficovich J.[5]
Campana Lee G.
6-26-2
R32
Boitan G.
Martin D.
6-26-3
Kozlov S.
Gaio F.[2]
6-44-66-2
Hernandez Serrano J.
Rubio Fierros A.
6-47-64
Boyer T.[3]
Ayeni O.
6-06-3
Rybakov A.
Wessels L.
6-26-2
Popko D.[6]
Fancutt T.
6-47-5
Brumm J.
Crawford O.[1]
7-602-66-3
Hardt N.
Paz J.
6-43-66-3
Mena F.
Bellier A.[7]
6-46-1
Pacheco Mendez R.
Trotter J.
6-46-4
Cid R.
Mayo A.[8]
6-23-66-1
Pichler D.
Langmo C.
6-43-66-3
Dellien Velasco M.[4]
Baris O.
6-36-2
Ficovich J.[5]
Aguilera Guerrero E.
6-36-1
Campana Lee G.
Brown P.
6-716-46-3
Ejupovic E.
Hilderbrand T.
7-636-3