Brandon Nakashima vs Terence Atmane — Miami Masters Qualifying Round 2

Miami Masters · ATP · Qualifying Round 2
Brandon Nakashima
USA10
Brandon Nakashima
#32ATP
1839ELO
1788Hard ELO
$990kYTD
$7.9MCAREER
24 yrs · 188 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLWWWLWWL
0 — 0
Sets
Retired
Monday, 18 March 2024
hard
Terence Atmane
FRA
Terence Atmane
#50ATP
1704ELO
1674Hard ELO
$707kYTD
$2.2MCAREER
24 yrs · 193 cm · Left-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLWLLLLLL
Nakashima B.
1-1
Atmane T.
Nakashima B.
1–
Atmane T.
1–

Brandon Nakashima advanced when Terence Atmane retired 1-1 in the Miami Masters qualifying round 2.

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Nakashima B.serving92% hold

wins 72% of points on serve vs Atmane T.

Atmane T.serving88% hold

wins 68% of points on serve vs Nakashima B.

Serve-dominated — both hold easily, expect tiebreaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Serve & return on hard

Nakashima B.Atmane T.
61
Serve
36
23
Return
27

Per-surface Serve / Return Rating (0–100, percentile within the hard field, opponent-adjusted over 52 weeks). About

Statistics

This season
Nakashima B.Atmane T.
1st serve in·Slight edge
66%
59%
1st serve points won·Even
75%
74%
2nd serve points won·Even
55%
51%
Service points won·Even
68%
64%
Return points won·Even
35%
35%
Break points saved·Even
66%
63%
Aces / match·Slight edge
8.6
7.5
Double faults / match·Dominant
1.2
3.8

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (177 vs 158). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Nakashima B.Atmane T.
Clutch Rating·Even
56
56
Break points saved·Even
99
95
Break points won·Clear edge
13
25
Deciding sets·Slight edge
64
54
Tiebreaks·Slight edge
89
96

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Nakashima B.
7.2
Strong advantageUmpiry Score
Atmane T.
6.3
Marginal edgeUmpiry Score
Form & Matchup
6.0+114 Hard Elo edge
Surface ELO
4.0Hard Elo 1674
5.8Overall Elo 1839
ELO gap
4.2Overall Elo 1704
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
6.0
Surface form
6.3
Win streak
0.0
Fatigue & Travel
7.8
Minutes 14d
3.6
7.0
3-set count
0.0
9.0
Prev. match
9.0
6.5
Country comfort
Context
6.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Nakashima B.Atmane T.
Freshness·Slight edge
88
95

Nakashima B.: 11 days rest · 2 matches (14d) · Atmane T.: 12 days rest · 1 match (14d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Mediumbalanced pace
SlowFast
Weather
30°CDrizzle
Wind 16 km/hHumidity 61%
Q2
Kopriva V.[21]
Wolf J.[11]
6-31-66-4
Seyboth Wild T.[1]
Grenier H.
6-36-4
Kovacevic A.[9]
Bergs Z.[24]
7-626-2
Walton A.
Martinez P.[8]
3-66-26-3
Nakashima B.[10]
Atmane T.
1-1
Wong C.
Nagal S.[16]
3-66-17-5
Schwartzman D.[22]
Rinderknech A.[5]
3-66-37-61
Klein L.
Mensik J.[4]
7-667-5
Bautista Agut R.[13]
Virtanen O.
6-44-66-4
Nava E.
Nishioka Y.[2]
7-57-66
Vavassori A.
Vacherot V.
6-24-67-63
Mayot H.
Goffin D.[19]
7-656-2
Q1
Vavassori A.
Ajdukovic D.[23]
4-67-627-65
Wong C.
Gaston H.[6]
6-23-66-2
Grenier H.
Kokkinakis T.[14]
6-44-1
Goffin D.[19]
Mochizuki S.
7-646-2
Rinderknech A.[5]
Bicknell B.
6-46-4
Bergs Z.[24]
Meligeni Alves F.
2-66-16-4
Walton A.
Monteiro T.[20]
6-757-636-4
Mayot H.
Cazaux A.[3]
6-45-71-2
Schwartzman D.[22]
Svajda Z.
6-37-66
Klein L.
Paire B.[18]
6-17-62
Martinez P.[8]
Blockx A.
6-26-2
Nava E.
Halys Q.[17]
6-47-5
Nishioka Y.[2]
Ymer E.
6-37-64
Nagal S.[16]
Diallo G.
7-636-2
Mensik J.[4]
Nardi L.
6-46-2
Nakashima B.[10]
Mmoh M.
2-67-646-4
Kovacevic A.[9]
Kypson P.
6-27-65
Bautista Agut R.[13]
Hassan B.
7-676-4
Vacherot V.
Garin C.[7]
6-36-4
Seyboth Wild T.[1]
Dzumhur D.
6-46-2
Virtanen O.
Rodionov J.[12]
6-737-676-2
Atmane T.
Kukushkin M.
6-46-4
Kopriva V.[21]
Sakamoto R.
7-657-65
Wolf J.[11]
Spizzirri E.
6-37-5