Alexander Ritschard vs Jakub Paul — Hamburg CH Round of 16

Hamburg CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 16
SUI7
Alexander Ritschard
#578ATP
1528ELO
1454Hard ELO
32 yrs · 193 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
WWLWLWWLWL
2 — 1
Sets
Monday, 11 March 2024
hard
SUI
Jakub Paul
#527ATP
1389ELO
1340Hard ELO
27 yrs · 180 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLLWWLLWW
Ritschard A.
3-6 7-6 6-2
Paul J.
Ritschard A.
37862
Paul J.
66621

Alexander Ritschard defeated Jakub Paul 3-6 7-6 6-2 in the Hamburg CH round of 16 on hard.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Ritschard A.serving74% hold

wins 60% of points on serve vs Paul J.

Paul J.serving68% hold

wins 57% of points on serve vs Ritschard A.

Serve advantage — Ritschard A.

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Ritschard A.Paul J.
1st serve in·Slight edge
59%
65%
1st serve points won·Even
69%
66%
2nd serve points won·Even
51%
51%
Service points won·Even
62%
60%
Return points won·Even
42%
41%
Break points saved·Even
62%
62%
Aces / match·Slight edge
2.6
1.9
Double faults / match·Dominant
3.6
1.4

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (100 vs 99). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Ritschard A.Paul J.
Clutch Rating·Clear edge
36
21
Break points saved·Clear edge
84
62
Break points won·Slight edge
14
20
Deciding sets·Dominant
40
5
Tiebreaks·Dominant
60
85

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Ritschard A.
6.7
Slight advantageUmpiry Score
Paul J.
4.5
Heavy underdogUmpiry Score
Form & Matchup
6.4+114 Hard Elo edge
Surface ELO
3.6Hard Elo 1340
6.7Overall Elo 1528
ELO gap
3.3Overall Elo 1389
10.0No prior meetings
H2H
0.0
4.9
Surface form
0.7
Win streak
0.0Lost last 5
Fatigue & Travel
7.2
Minutes 14d
9.1
4.0
3-set count
7.0
Prev. match
8.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
6.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Conditions

Court speed
Fastbig serves, short points
SlowFast
Final
Squire H.
Chidekh C.
6-46-2
Semi-finals
Squire H.
Blockx A.
6-37-5
Chidekh C.
Shimizu Y.
6-37-66
Quarter-finals
Squire H.
Molleker R.[6]
5-3
Blockx A.
Ritschard A.[7]
7-56-2
Chidekh C.
Agwi M.
6-46-3
Shimizu Y.
Bellucci M.[5]
6-47-65
R16
Ritschard A.[7]
Paul J.
3-67-666-2
Blockx A.
Yunchaokete B.[3]
3-66-26-1
Molleker R.[6]
Berankis R.
6-42-67-5
Squire H.
Uchiyama Y.
6-46-2
Agwi M.
Huesler M.[8]
6-45-76-4
Chidekh C.
Kuhn N.
6-26-2
Bellucci M.[5]
Topo M.
6-46-4
Shimizu Y.
Kirkin E.
6-46-4
R32
Berankis R.
Yevseyev D.
7-56-756-2
Kuhn N.
Harris B.[4]
6-47-65
Molleker R.[6]
Rehberg M.
6-27-64
Squire H.
Diez S.
6-26-4
Yunchaokete B.[3]
Fanselow S.
6-16-3
Agwi M.
Ilkel C.
6-06-2
Uchiyama Y.
Choinski J.[1]
6-47-65
Blockx A.
Kasnikowski M.
6-47-64
Paul J.
Bertola R.
6-46-3
Ritschard A.[7]
De Schepper K.
3-66-16-3
Huesler M.[8]
Escoffier A.
6-36-1
Chidekh C.
Andreev A.
6-26-766-3
Bellucci M.[5]
Habib H.
6-37-5
Topo M.
Edmund K.
6-47-68
Kirkin E.
Marchenko I.
4-66-36-4
Shimizu Y.
Shimabukuro S.[2]
7-656-4