Quentin Halys vs J J Wolf — Phoenix CH Round of 32

Phoenix CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 32
Quentin Halys
FRA
Quentin Halys
#90ATP
1707ELO
1677Hard ELO
$694kYTD
$5.4MCAREER
29 yrs · 191 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLWLLLWWL
2 — 1
Sets
Monday, 11 March 2024
hard
J J Wolf
USA
J J Wolf
27 yrs · 183 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLWLLLLLLW
Halys Q.
2-6 7-5 7-6
Wolf J.
Halys Q.
27772
Wolf J.
65651

Quentin Halys defeated J J Wolf 2-6 7-5 7-6 in the Phoenix CH round of 32 on hard. The result followed the form book — Quentin Halys came in defending last year's semi-final.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Halys Q.serving88% hold

wins 68% of points on serve vs Wolf J.

Wolf J.serving85% hold

wins 66% of points on serve vs Halys Q.

Serve-dominated — both hold easily, expect tiebreaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Serve & return on hard

Halys Q.Wolf J.
35
Serve
—
26
Return
—

Per-surface Serve / Return Rating (0–100, percentile within the hard field, opponent-adjusted over 52 weeks). About

Statistics

This season
Halys Q.Wolf J.
1st serve in·Even
59%
56%
1st serve points won·Slight edge
78%
71%
2nd serve points won·Even
51%
48%
Service points won·Slight edge
67%
61%
Return points won·Even
34%
38%
Break points saved·Slight edge
65%
56%
Aces / match·Dominant
10.7
5.8
Double faults / match·Slight edge
3.6
3.2

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (158 vs 56). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Halys Q.Wolf J.
Clutch Rating·Even
57
61
Break points saved·Even
97
93
Break points won·Dominant
4
49
Deciding sets·Slight edge
75
66
Tiebreaks·Dominant
91
59

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Halys Q.
6.5
Marginal edgeUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Wolf J.
5.6
Slight disadvantageUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Form & Matchup
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
5.4
Surface form
2.3
0.0Lost last 2
Win streak
0.0Lost last 4
Fatigue & Travel
9.2
Minutes 14d
9.4
9.0
Prev. match
9.0
Context
8.5
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Halys Q.Wolf J.
Freshness·Even
92
96

Halys Q.: 11 days rest · 2 matches (14d) · Wolf J.: 13 days rest · 1 match (14d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Mediumbalanced pace
SlowFast
Final
Borges N.[5]
Berrettini M.
7-57-64
Semi-finals
Berrettini M.
Vukic A.[7]
7-627-62
Borges N.[5]
Van Assche L.
6-44-66-2
Quarter-finals
Vukic A.[7]
Halys Q.
6-46-4
Borges N.[5]
Kokkinakis T.
7-616-1
Berrettini M.
Atmane T.
3-67-617-66
Van Assche L.
Kudla D.
6-36-1
R16
Borges N.[5]
Paire B.
4-2
Van Assche L.
Lestienne C.
4-1
Halys Q.
Nava E.
6-13-66-3
Kudla D.
Galan D.
6-26-3
Kokkinakis T.
Rinderknech A.
6-12-66-4
Vukic A.[7]
Fognini F.
6-16-1
Berrettini M.
Cazaux A.[8]
3-66-17-5
Atmane T.
Svajda Z.
7-52-66-3
R32
Lestienne C.
Carballes Baena R.[6]
6-04-1
Paire B.
Medjedovic H.
5-76-46-3
Kudla D.
Safiullin R.[3]
6-33-66-1
Vukic A.[7]
Kopriva V.
6-16-0
Fognini F.
Mmoh M.
7-646-2
Cazaux A.[8]
Walton A.
7-656-4
Halys Q.
Wolf J.
2-67-57-65
Kokkinakis T.
Eubanks C.[1]
7-57-5
Rinderknech A.
Hijikata R.
6-46-2
Borges N.[5]
Muller A.
6-26-4
Galan D.
Rodionov J.
6-46-4
Van Assche L.
Garin C.
2-66-46-4
Nava E.
Hanfmann Y.[4]
6-46-0
Berrettini M.
Gaston H.
3-66-36-1
Svajda Z.
Krueger M.
6-37-5
Atmane T.
Ofner S.[2]
7-651-66-4