Denis Kudla vs Daniel Elahi Galan — Phoenix CH Round of 16

Phoenix CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 16
USA
Denis Kudla
33 yrs · 180 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLWLWWLLW
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 11 March 2024
hard
Daniel Elahi Galan
COL
Daniel Elahi Galan
#304ATP
1531ELO
1497Hard ELO
30 yrs · 191 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLWWWLWWW
Kudla D.
6-2 6-3
Galan D.
Kudla D.
662
Galan D.
230

Denis Kudla defeated Daniel Elahi Galan 6-2 6-3 in the Phoenix CH round of 16 on hard. The result followed the form book — Denis Kudla came in defending last year's round of 32.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Kudla D.serving80% hold

wins 63% of points on serve vs Galan D.

Galan D.serving78% hold

wins 62% of points on serve vs Kudla D.

Even serve battle

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Kudla D.Galan D.
1st serve in·Slight edge
58%
63%
1st serve points won·Even
71%
69%
2nd serve points won·Even
49%
50%
Service points won·Even
62%
62%
Return points won·Even
39%
38%
Break points saved·Even
58%
61%
Aces / match·Slight edge
6.0
5.0
Double faults / match·Clear edge
2.9
2.0

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (44 vs 149). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Kudla D.Galan D.
Clutch Rating·Even
50
48
Break points saved·Even
90
92
Break points won·Even
19
21
Deciding sets·Dominant
82
55
Tiebreaks·Dominant
30
66

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Kudla D.
6.5
Marginal edgeUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Galan D.
6.0
Even matchUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Form & Matchup
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
5.5
Surface form
3.1
Win streak
0.0Lost last 2
Fatigue & Travel
7.0
Minutes 14d
8.9
7.0
3-set count
9.0
Prev. match
8.0
Context
6.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Conditions

Court speed
Mediumbalanced pace
SlowFast
Final
Borges N.[5]
Berrettini M.
7-57-64
Semi-finals
Berrettini M.
Vukic A.[7]
7-627-62
Borges N.[5]
Van Assche L.
6-44-66-2
Quarter-finals
Vukic A.[7]
Halys Q.
6-46-4
Borges N.[5]
Kokkinakis T.
7-616-1
Berrettini M.
Atmane T.
3-67-617-66
Van Assche L.
Kudla D.
6-36-1
R16
Borges N.[5]
Paire B.
4-2
Van Assche L.
Lestienne C.
4-1
Halys Q.
Nava E.
6-13-66-3
Kudla D.
Galan D.
6-26-3
Kokkinakis T.
Rinderknech A.
6-12-66-4
Vukic A.[7]
Fognini F.
6-16-1
Berrettini M.
Cazaux A.[8]
3-66-17-5
Atmane T.
Svajda Z.
7-52-66-3
R32
Lestienne C.
Carballes Baena R.[6]
6-04-1
Paire B.
Medjedovic H.
5-76-46-3
Kudla D.
Safiullin R.[3]
6-33-66-1
Vukic A.[7]
Kopriva V.
6-16-0
Fognini F.
Mmoh M.
7-646-2
Cazaux A.[8]
Walton A.
7-656-4
Halys Q.
Wolf J.
2-67-57-65
Kokkinakis T.
Eubanks C.[1]
7-57-5
Rinderknech A.
Hijikata R.
6-46-2
Borges N.[5]
Muller A.
6-26-4
Galan D.
Rodionov J.
6-46-4
Van Assche L.
Garin C.
2-66-46-4
Nava E.
Hanfmann Y.[4]
6-46-0
Berrettini M.
Gaston H.
3-66-36-1
Svajda Z.
Krueger M.
6-37-5
Atmane T.
Ofner S.[2]
7-651-66-4