Daniel Michalski vs Cezar Cretu — Szekesfehervar CH Round of 16

Szekesfehervar CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 16
Daniel Michalski
POL
Daniel Michalski
#299ATP
1435ELO
1386Clay ELO
26 yrs · 180 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLWLLWWLLL
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 11 March 2024
clay
ROU
Cezar Cretu
#268ATP
1524ELO
1492Clay ELO
25 yrs · 188 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLWLLWWWLL
Michalski D.
6-3 6-1
Cretu C.
Michalski D.
662
Cretu C.
310

Daniel Michalski defeated Cezar Cretu 6-3 6-1 in the Szekesfehervar CH round of 16 on clay.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Michalski D.serving59% hold

wins 54% of points on serve vs Cretu C.

Cretu C.serving64% hold

wins 56% of points on serve vs Michalski D.

Baseline battle — serve is shaky, expect plenty of breaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Michalski D.Cretu C.
1st serve in·Even
61%
64%
1st serve points won·Even
65%
66%
2nd serve points won·Even
49%
51%
Service points won·Even
59%
60%
Return points won·Even
41%
42%
Break points saved·Even
54%
57%
Aces / match·Even
2.0
2.5
Double faults / match·Slight edge
1.9
2.4

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (98 vs 69). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Michalski D.Cretu C.
Clutch Rating·Even
26
25
Break points saved·Slight edge
24
33
Break points won·Dominant
26
64
Deciding sets·Dominant
64
31
Tiebreaks·
62
—

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Michalski D.
5.4
Clear underdogUmpiry Score
Cretu C.
4.3
Heavy underdogUmpiry Score
  • Extended break: 175 days (−1.5)
Form & Matchup
4.4Clay Elo 1386
Surface ELO
5.6+106 Clay Elo edge
4.6Overall Elo 1435
ELO gap
5.4Overall Elo 1524
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
2.4
Surface form
4.7
0.0Lost last 2
Win streak
0.0Lost last 2
Fatigue & Travel
8.0
Prev. match
6.0
Surface transition
Context
6.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Michalski D.Cretu C.
Freshness·Slight edge
73
83

Michalski D.: 3 days rest · 3 matches, 67 games (7d) · Cretu C.: 5 days rest · 2 matches, 46 games (7d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Medium-slowfavours grinders
SlowFast
Final
Tseng C.
Droguet T.[7]
4-1
Semi-finals
Tseng C.
Maestrelli F.
3-66-46-4
Droguet T.[7]
Agamenone F.
6-26-2
Quarter-finals
Droguet T.[7]
Piros Z.[2]
4-66-16-4
Maestrelli F.
Michalski D.
6-26-3
Tseng C.
Martineau M.[8]
6-44-66-4
Agamenone F.
Kolar Z.
4-67-616-3
R16
Agamenone F.
Fatic N.
4-66-36-0
Piros Z.[2]
Rodriguez Taverna S.
7-52-66-3
Michalski D.
Cretu C.
6-36-1
Maestrelli F.
Pellegrino A.[5]
6-16-4
Tseng C.
Vincent Ruggeri S.
2-66-26-3
Martineau M.[8]
Giannessi A.
6-47-62
Kolar Z.
Guinard M.
6-37-5
Droguet T.[7]
Kovalik J.
6-47-65
R32
Cretu C.
Martin Tiffon P.
6-26-1
Guinard M.
Fuele M.
6-36-0
Kovalik J.
Fajta P.
6-26-3
Kolar Z.
Misolic F.[6]
4-66-36-4
Rodriguez Taverna S.
Melzer G.
6-34-67-65
Martineau M.[8]
Valkusz M.
4-66-16-1
Agamenone F.
Shelbayh A.
7-626-0
Vincent Ruggeri S.
Neumayer L.
1-66-46-3
Michalski D.
Thiem D.[1]
6-36-4
Maestrelli F.
Boros A.
7-56-1
Pellegrino A.[5]
Skatov T.
6-726-26-4
Tseng C.
Gasquet R.[3]
6-46-2
Giannessi A.
Bourgue M.
6-41-66-4
Fatic N.
Llamas Ruiz P.[4]
6-46-756-0
Droguet T.[7]
Dalla Valle E.
6-06-3
Piros Z.[2]
Fonio G.
6-36-2