Juan Manuel Cerundolo vs Joao Lucas Reis Da Silva — Santiago CH Round of 32

Santiago CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 32
Juan Manuel Cerundolo
ARG6
Juan Manuel Cerundolo
#45ATP
1790ELO
1762Clay ELO
$752kYTD
$2.4MCAREER
24 yrs · 183 cm · Left-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLWWLWWWWW
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 11 March 2024
clay
Joao Lucas Reis Da Silva
BRA
Joao Lucas Reis Da Silva
#250ATP
1486ELO
1470Clay ELO
$76kYTD
$371kCAREER
26 yrs · 178 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLWWLWLWLW
Cerundolo J.
6-1 6-0
Reis Da Silva J.
Cerundolo J.
662
Reis Da Silva J.
100

Juan Manuel Cerundolo defeated Joao Lucas Reis Da Silva 6-1 6-0 in the Santiago CH round of 32 on clay. The result followed the form book — Juan Manuel Cerundolo came in ranked #45, defending last year's round of 32.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Cerundolo J.serving66% hold

wins 56% of points on serve vs Reis Da Silva J.

Reis Da Silva J.serving63% hold

wins 55% of points on serve vs Cerundolo J.

Baseline battle — serve is shaky, expect plenty of breaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Serve & return on clay

Cerundolo J.Reis Da Silva J.
15
Serve
—
41
Return
—

Per-surface Serve / Return Rating (0–100, percentile within the clay field, opponent-adjusted over 52 weeks). About

Statistics

This season
Cerundolo J.Reis Da Silva J.
1st serve in·Even
60%
63%
1st serve points won·Even
67%
66%
2nd serve points won·Even
51%
50%
Service points won·Even
61%
60%
Return points won·Even
41%
41%
Break points saved·Even
57%
59%
Aces / match·Slight edge
3.3
2.2
Double faults / match·Slight edge
2.8
2.1

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (182 vs 148). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Cerundolo J.Reis Da Silva J.
Clutch Rating·Dominant
85
12
Break points saved·Dominant
82
49
Break points won·Dominant
80
43
Deciding sets·Dominant
98
9
Tiebreaks·Dominant
96
17

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Cerundolo J.
7.2
Strong advantageUmpiry Score
Reis Da Silva J.
4.0
Heavy underdogUmpiry Score
  • Extended break: 42 days (−0.7)
Form & Matchup
7.7+291 Clay Elo edge
Surface ELO
2.3Clay Elo 1470
7.8Overall Elo 1790
ELO gap
2.2Overall Elo 1486
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
6.1
Surface form
4.3
0.0
Win streak
0.0Lost last 4
Fatigue & Travel
1.8
Minutes 14d
4.0
3-set count
8.0
Prev. match
Context
6.0
Defending pts
6.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Cerundolo J.Reis Da Silva J.
Freshness·
100
—

Cerundolo J.: 15 days rest. Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Slowlow bounce, long rallies
SlowFast
Final
Varillas J.[2]
Bagnis F.[4]
6-36-2
Semi-finals
Varillas J.[2]
Draxl L.
6-36-2
Bagnis F.[4]
Heide G.
6-47-61
Quarter-finals
Draxl L.
Ugo Carabelli C.[3]
6-45-77-5
Heide G.
Mager G.
6-27-65
Bagnis F.[4]
Dellien H.[7]
6-37-68
Varillas J.[2]
Passaro F.
7-54-67-66
R16
Dellien H.[7]
Gomez F.
3-66-16-0
Varillas J.[2]
Luz O.
6-32-67-63
Draxl L.
Olivieri G.[8]
6-14-66-1
Heide G.
Collarini A.
7-56-1
Mager G.
Aboian V.
5-76-16-2
Bagnis F.[4]
Boitan G.
6-46-2
Ugo Carabelli C.[3]
Buse I.
7-696-4
Passaro F.
Cerundolo J.[6]
6-17-5
R32
Bagnis F.[4]
Campana Lee G.
6-17-5
Heide G.
Barrios Vera T.[1]
6-36-4
Collarini A.
Lavagno E.
6-36-1
Aboian V.
Pucinelli De Almeida M.
6-46-4
Mager G.
Burruchaga R.[5]
3-66-36-3
Boitan G.
Kestelboim M.
6-46-4
Gomez F.
Fonseca J.
7-622-66-4
Dellien H.[7]
Bueno G.
6-47-64
Olivieri G.[8]
Oliveira G.
2-67-56-2
Draxl L.
Sekulic P.
6-776-47-62
Buse I.
Weis A.
4-66-46-2
Ugo Carabelli C.[3]
Soto M.
4-66-46-3
Cerundolo J.[6]
Reis Da Silva J.
6-16-0
Passaro F.
Dellien Velasco M.
6-06-4
Luz O.
Olivo R.
6-32-1
Varillas J.[2]
Jubb P.
3-66-37-66