Facundo Bagnis vs Gerard Campana Lee — Santiago CH Round of 32

Santiago CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 32
ARG4
Facundo Bagnis
#431ATP
1591ELO
1584Clay ELO
36 yrs · 183 cm · Left-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLWWLWWWL
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 11 March 2024
clay
KOR
Gerard Campana Lee
#632ATP
21 yrs · 183 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
WWLWWLLWWW
Bagnis F.
6-1 7-5
Campana Lee G.
Bagnis F.
672
Campana Lee G.
150

Facundo Bagnis defeated Gerard Campana Lee 6-1 7-5 in the Santiago CH round of 32 on clay. The result followed the form book — Facundo Bagnis came in ranked #431, defending last year's quarter-final.

Key context

  • Match story: Facundo Bagnis came through a tight passage before pulling clear — 6–1 7–5.

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Bagnis F.serving68% hold

wins 57% of points on serve vs Campana Lee G.

Campana Lee G.serving61% hold

wins 55% of points on serve vs Bagnis F.

Baseline battle — serve is shaky, expect plenty of breaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Bagnis F.Campana Lee G.
1st serve in·Even
64%
64%
1st serve points won·Slight edge
69%
63%
2nd serve points won·Even
52%
49%
Service points won·Even
62%
58%
Return points won·Even
40%
41%
Break points saved·Slight edge
63%
55%
Aces / match·Clear edge
4.1
1.9
Double faults / match·Clear edge
2.4
3.5

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (73 vs 103). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Bagnis F.Campana Lee G.
Clutch Rating·Dominant
54
0
Break points saved·Dominant
92
18
Break points won·Clear edge
35
51
Deciding sets·Dominant
89
4
Tiebreaks·Clear edge
3
15

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Bagnis F.
6.2
Even matchUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Campana Lee G.
4.3
Heavy underdogUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
  • Recent retirement (−1.5)
Form & Matchup
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
6.0
Surface form
3.8
Win streak
0.0Lost last 2
Fatigue & Travel
1.9
Minutes 14d
8.4
0.0
3-set count
6.0
Prev. match
6.0
6.0
Surface transition
Context
7.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Bagnis F.Campana Lee G.
Freshness·
—
65

Campana Lee G.: 1 day rest · 3 matches, 63 games (7d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Slowlow bounce, long rallies
SlowFast
Final
Varillas J.[2]
Bagnis F.[4]
6-36-2
Semi-finals
Varillas J.[2]
Draxl L.
6-36-2
Bagnis F.[4]
Heide G.
6-47-61
Quarter-finals
Draxl L.
Ugo Carabelli C.[3]
6-45-77-5
Heide G.
Mager G.
6-27-65
Bagnis F.[4]
Dellien H.[7]
6-37-68
Varillas J.[2]
Passaro F.
7-54-67-66
R16
Dellien H.[7]
Gomez F.
3-66-16-0
Varillas J.[2]
Luz O.
6-32-67-63
Draxl L.
Olivieri G.[8]
6-14-66-1
Heide G.
Collarini A.
7-56-1
Mager G.
Aboian V.
5-76-16-2
Bagnis F.[4]
Boitan G.
6-46-2
Ugo Carabelli C.[3]
Buse I.
7-696-4
Passaro F.
Cerundolo J.[6]
6-17-5
R32
Bagnis F.[4]
Campana Lee G.
6-17-5
Heide G.
Barrios Vera T.[1]
6-36-4
Collarini A.
Lavagno E.
6-36-1
Aboian V.
Pucinelli De Almeida M.
6-46-4
Mager G.
Burruchaga R.[5]
3-66-36-3
Boitan G.
Kestelboim M.
6-46-4
Gomez F.
Fonseca J.
7-622-66-4
Dellien H.[7]
Bueno G.
6-47-64
Olivieri G.[8]
Oliveira G.
2-67-56-2
Draxl L.
Sekulic P.
6-776-47-62
Buse I.
Weis A.
4-66-46-2
Ugo Carabelli C.[3]
Soto M.
4-66-46-3
Cerundolo J.[6]
Reis Da Silva J.
6-16-0
Passaro F.
Dellien Velasco M.
6-06-4
Luz O.
Olivo R.
6-32-1
Varillas J.[2]
Jubb P.
3-66-37-66