Facundo Bagnis vs Gabi Adrian Boitan — Santiago CH Round of 16

Santiago CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 16
ARG4
Facundo Bagnis
#431ATP
1591ELO
1584Clay ELO
36 yrs · 183 cm · Left-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLWWLWWWL
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 11 March 2024
clay
ROU
Gabi Adrian Boitan
1370ELO
1352Clay ELO
27 yrs · 185 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLLWWLWLL
Bagnis F.
6-4 6-2
Boitan G.
Bagnis F.
662
Boitan G.
420

Facundo Bagnis defeated Gabi Adrian Boitan 6-4 6-2 in the Santiago CH round of 16 on clay. The result followed the form book — Facundo Bagnis came in defending last year's quarter-final.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Bagnis F.serving72% hold

wins 59% of points on serve vs Boitan G.

Boitan G.serving68% hold

wins 57% of points on serve vs Bagnis F.

Serve advantage — Bagnis F.

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Bagnis F.Boitan G.
1st serve in·Even
64%
63%
1st serve points won·Even
69%
69%
2nd serve points won·Even
51%
47%
Service points won·Even
62%
61%
Return points won·Even
40%
39%
Break points saved·Even
63%
60%
Aces / match·Slight edge
4.0
3.3
Double faults / match·Dominant
2.4
5.3

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (73 vs 80). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Bagnis F.
7.0
Strong advantageUmpiry Score
Boitan G.
5.5
Slight disadvantageUmpiry Score
Form & Matchup
8.0+232 Clay Elo edge
Surface ELO
2.0Clay Elo 1352
7.9Overall Elo 1591
ELO gap
2.1Overall Elo 1370
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
6.0
Surface form
5.3
Fatigue & Travel
1.9
Minutes 14d
7.6
0.0
3-set count
6.0
Prev. match
9.0
6.0
Surface transition
Context
7.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Conditions

Court speed
Slowlow bounce, long rallies
SlowFast
Final
Varillas J.[2]
Bagnis F.[4]
6-36-2
Semi-finals
Varillas J.[2]
Draxl L.
6-36-2
Bagnis F.[4]
Heide G.
6-47-61
Quarter-finals
Draxl L.
Ugo Carabelli C.[3]
6-45-77-5
Heide G.
Mager G.
6-27-65
Bagnis F.[4]
Dellien H.[7]
6-37-68
Varillas J.[2]
Passaro F.
7-54-67-66
R16
Dellien H.[7]
Gomez F.
3-66-16-0
Varillas J.[2]
Luz O.
6-32-67-63
Draxl L.
Olivieri G.[8]
6-14-66-1
Heide G.
Collarini A.
7-56-1
Mager G.
Aboian V.
5-76-16-2
Bagnis F.[4]
Boitan G.
6-46-2
Ugo Carabelli C.[3]
Buse I.
7-696-4
Passaro F.
Cerundolo J.[6]
6-17-5
R32
Bagnis F.[4]
Campana Lee G.
6-17-5
Heide G.
Barrios Vera T.[1]
6-36-4
Collarini A.
Lavagno E.
6-36-1
Aboian V.
Pucinelli De Almeida M.
6-46-4
Mager G.
Burruchaga R.[5]
3-66-36-3
Boitan G.
Kestelboim M.
6-46-4
Gomez F.
Fonseca J.
7-622-66-4
Dellien H.[7]
Bueno G.
6-47-64
Olivieri G.[8]
Oliveira G.
2-67-56-2
Draxl L.
Sekulic P.
6-776-47-62
Buse I.
Weis A.
4-66-46-2
Ugo Carabelli C.[3]
Soto M.
4-66-46-3
Cerundolo J.[6]
Reis Da Silva J.
6-16-0
Passaro F.
Dellien Velasco M.
6-06-4
Luz O.
Olivo R.
6-32-1
Varillas J.[2]
Jubb P.
3-66-37-66