Clement Tabur vs Emilien Voisin — Kigali 2 CH Round of 32

Kigali 2 CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 32
Clement Tabur
FRA5
Clement Tabur
#178ATP
1607ELO
1553Clay ELO
$199kYTD
$640kCAREER
26 yrs · 173 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
WWWLLWWLWL
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 4 March 2024
clay
FRA
Emilien Voisin
26 yrs · 178 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLWWLLWLW
Tabur C.
6-1 6-4
Voisin E.
Tabur C.
662
Voisin E.
140

Clement Tabur defeated Emilien Voisin 6-1 6-4 in the Kigali 2 CH round of 32 on clay.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Tabur C.serving69% hold

wins 58% of points on serve vs Voisin E.

Voisin E.serving70% hold

wins 58% of points on serve vs Tabur C.

Baseline battle — serve is shaky, expect plenty of breaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Tabur C.Voisin E.
1st serve in·Slight edge
61%
67%
1st serve points won·Even
70%
68%
2nd serve points won·Even
50%
51%
Service points won·Even
62%
62%
Return points won·Even
40%
41%
Break points saved·Even
60%
64%
Aces / match·Dominant
3.5
6.5
Double faults / match·Even
2.8
2.5

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (130 vs 6). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Tabur C.
5.8
Slight disadvantageUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Voisin E.
6.1
Even matchUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Form & Matchup
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
4.3
Surface form
4.5
0.0Lost last 4
Win streak
0.0
Fatigue & Travel
8.4
Minutes 14d
8.4
6.0
Prev. match
9.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Tabur C.Voisin E.
Freshness·
55
—

Tabur C.: 1 day rest · 4 matches, 100 games (7d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Fastbig serves, short points
SlowFast
Final
Trungelliti M.[4]
Tabur C.[5]
6-46-2
Semi-finals
Trungelliti M.[4]
Majchrzak K.
6-36-4
Tabur C.[5]
Wenger D.
6-16-3
Quarter-finals
Tabur C.[5]
Hemery C.[3]
4-67-646-4
Wenger D.
Cukierman D.
1-66-37-62
Majchrzak K.
Kozlov S.
6-36-0
Trungelliti M.[4]
Safwat M.
1-66-26-1
R16
Hemery C.[3]
Denolly C.
6-30-0
Trungelliti M.[4]
Fancutt T.
6-36-3
Wenger D.
Ouakaa A.
3-66-43-0
Safwat M.
Paz J.
7-646-2
Majchrzak K.
Pichler D.
6-36-2
Kozlov S.
Lock B.[7]
7-625-76-4
Tabur C.[5]
Casanova H.
6-46-3
Cukierman D.
Ayeni O.
4-66-07-5
R32
Paz J.
Oliel Y.
6-26-2
Kozlov S.
Schachter N.
6-36-4
Ouakaa A.
Iradukunda G.
4-66-17-63
Casanova H.
Bax F.
6-46-4
Cukierman D.
Habiyambere E.
6-26-0
Majchrzak K.
Gakhov I.[1]
6-35-77-5
Pichler D.
El Sallaly A.
6-26-3
Lock B.[7]
Pennaforti G.
6-37-65
Trungelliti M.[4]
Brumm J.
7-56-2
Fancutt T.
Dev S.
6-27-5
Safwat M.
Houkes M.[8]
6-26-4
Tabur C.[5]
Voisin E.
6-16-4
Denolly C.
Sheehy J.
6-16-4
Hemery C.[3]
Bobrov B.
6-36-4
Wenger D.
Ionel N.[6]
7-56-1
Ayeni O.
Lyeons J.
6-46-3