Marco Trungelliti vs Clement Tabur — Kigali 2 CH Final

Kigali 2 CH · CHALLENGER · Final
Marco Trungelliti
ARG4
Marco Trungelliti
#94ATP
1627ELO
1621Clay ELO
$395kYTD
$2.6MCAREER
36 yrs · 178 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLWLWLWWL
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 4 March 2024
clay
Clement Tabur
FRA5
Clement Tabur
#189ATP
1607ELO
1553Clay ELO
$199kYTD
$640kCAREER
26 yrs · 173 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
WLLWWLWLWW
Trungelliti M.
6-4 6-2
Tabur C.
Trungelliti M.
662
Tabur C.
420

Marco Trungelliti defeated Clement Tabur 6-4 6-2 in the Kigali 2 CH final on clay. The result followed the form book — Marco Trungelliti came in ranked #94.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Trungelliti M.serving68% hold

wins 57% of points on serve vs Tabur C.

Tabur C.serving70% hold

wins 58% of points on serve vs Trungelliti M.

Baseline battle — serve is shaky, expect plenty of breaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Trungelliti M.Tabur C.
1st serve in·Even
60%
61%
1st serve points won·Even
69%
70%
2nd serve points won·Even
50%
50%
Service points won·Even
61%
62%
Return points won·Even
40%
40%
Break points saved·Even
62%
60%
Aces / match·Even
3.4
3.5
Double faults / match·Slight edge
3.4
2.8

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (177 vs 130). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Trungelliti M.Tabur C.
Clutch Rating·Clear edge
51
29
Break points saved·Clear edge
87
74
Break points won·Even
24
23
Deciding sets·Dominant
87
33
Tiebreaks·Clear edge
19
40

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Trungelliti M.
6.8
Slight advantageUmpiry Score
Tabur C.
5.4
Clear underdogUmpiry Score
Form & Matchup
6.5+68 Clay Elo edge
Surface ELO
3.5Clay Elo 1553
5.7Overall Elo 1627
ELO gap
4.3Overall Elo 1607
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
5.9
Surface form
4.3
0.0
Win streak
0.0Lost last 4
Fatigue & Travel
4.7
Minutes 14d
8.4
7.0
3-set count
9.0
Prev. match
6.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Trungelliti M.Tabur C.
Freshness·Slight edge
93
87

Trungelliti M.: 12 days rest · 1 match (14d) · Tabur C.: 4 days rest · 1 match, 26 games (7d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Fastbig serves, short points
SlowFast
Final
Trungelliti M.[4]
Tabur C.[5]
6-46-2
Semi-finals
Trungelliti M.[4]
Majchrzak K.
6-36-4
Tabur C.[5]
Wenger D.
6-16-3
Quarter-finals
Tabur C.[5]
Hemery C.[3]
4-67-646-4
Wenger D.
Cukierman D.
1-66-37-62
Majchrzak K.
Kozlov S.
6-36-0
Trungelliti M.[4]
Safwat M.
1-66-26-1
R16
Hemery C.[3]
Denolly C.
6-30-0
Trungelliti M.[4]
Fancutt T.
6-36-3
Wenger D.
Ouakaa A.
3-66-43-0
Safwat M.
Paz J.
7-646-2
Majchrzak K.
Pichler D.
6-36-2
Kozlov S.
Lock B.[7]
7-625-76-4
Tabur C.[5]
Casanova H.
6-46-3
Cukierman D.
Ayeni O.
4-66-07-5
R32
Paz J.
Oliel Y.
6-26-2
Kozlov S.
Schachter N.
6-36-4
Ouakaa A.
Iradukunda G.
4-66-17-63
Casanova H.
Bax F.
6-46-4
Cukierman D.
Habiyambere E.
6-26-0
Majchrzak K.
Gakhov I.[1]
6-35-77-5
Pichler D.
El Sallaly A.
6-26-3
Lock B.[7]
Pennaforti G.
6-37-65
Trungelliti M.[4]
Brumm J.
7-56-2
Fancutt T.
Dev S.
6-27-5
Safwat M.
Houkes M.[8]
6-26-4
Tabur C.[5]
Voisin E.
6-16-4
Denolly C.
Sheehy J.
6-16-4
Hemery C.[3]
Bobrov B.
6-36-4
Wenger D.
Ionel N.[6]
7-56-1
Ayeni O.
Lyeons J.
6-46-3