Mohamed Safwat vs Juan Pablo Paz — Kigali 2 CH Round of 16

Kigali 2 CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 16
EGY
Mohamed Safwat
#1884ATP
35 yrs · 180 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLWLWLLLW
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 4 March 2024
clay
ARG
Juan Pablo Paz
#1785ATP
31 yrs · 173 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLLWWWLLW
Safwat M.
7-6 6-2
Paz J.
Safwat M.
7762
Paz J.
6420

Mohamed Safwat defeated Juan Pablo Paz 7-6 6-2 in the Kigali 2 CH round of 16 on clay.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Safwat M.serving74% hold

wins 60% of points on serve vs Paz J.

Paz J.serving74% hold

wins 60% of points on serve vs Safwat M.

Even serve battle

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Safwat M.Paz J.
1st serve in·Slight edge
54%
63%
1st serve points won·Even
71%
67%
2nd serve points won·Even
50%
48%
Service points won·Even
61%
60%
Return points won·Even
36%
37%
Break points saved·Slight edge
62%
57%
Aces / match·Even
3.4
3.8
Double faults / match·Slight edge
3.1
2.8

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (20 vs 18). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Safwat M.Paz J.
Clutch Rating·Slight edge
8
0
Break points saved·Dominant
64
32
Break points won·Clear edge
2
24
Deciding sets·Slight edge
17
11
Tiebreaks·Clear edge
21
9

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Safwat M.
5.9
Even matchUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Paz J.
5.9
Even matchUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Form & Matchup
4.6No prior meetings
H2H
5.4
4.1
Surface form
4.0
0.0Lost last 2
Win streak
Fatigue & Travel
7.0
Minutes 14d
8.5
8.0
Prev. match
8.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Conditions

Court speed
Fastbig serves, short points
SlowFast
Final
Trungelliti M.[4]
Tabur C.[5]
6-46-2
Semi-finals
Trungelliti M.[4]
Majchrzak K.
6-36-4
Tabur C.[5]
Wenger D.
6-16-3
Quarter-finals
Tabur C.[5]
Hemery C.[3]
4-67-646-4
Wenger D.
Cukierman D.
1-66-37-62
Majchrzak K.
Kozlov S.
6-36-0
Trungelliti M.[4]
Safwat M.
1-66-26-1
R16
Hemery C.[3]
Denolly C.
6-30-0
Trungelliti M.[4]
Fancutt T.
6-36-3
Wenger D.
Ouakaa A.
3-66-43-0
Safwat M.
Paz J.
7-646-2
Majchrzak K.
Pichler D.
6-36-2
Kozlov S.
Lock B.[7]
7-625-76-4
Tabur C.[5]
Casanova H.
6-46-3
Cukierman D.
Ayeni O.
4-66-07-5
R32
Paz J.
Oliel Y.
6-26-2
Kozlov S.
Schachter N.
6-36-4
Ouakaa A.
Iradukunda G.
4-66-17-63
Casanova H.
Bax F.
6-46-4
Cukierman D.
Habiyambere E.
6-26-0
Majchrzak K.
Gakhov I.[1]
6-35-77-5
Pichler D.
El Sallaly A.
6-26-3
Lock B.[7]
Pennaforti G.
6-37-65
Trungelliti M.[4]
Brumm J.
7-56-2
Fancutt T.
Dev S.
6-27-5
Safwat M.
Houkes M.[8]
6-26-4
Tabur C.[5]
Voisin E.
6-16-4
Denolly C.
Sheehy J.
6-16-4
Hemery C.[3]
Bobrov B.
6-36-4
Wenger D.
Ionel N.[6]
7-56-1
Ayeni O.
Lyeons J.
6-46-3