Stefan Kozlov vs Noah Schachter — Kigali 2 CH Round of 32

Kigali 2 CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 32
Stefan Kozlov
USA
Stefan Kozlov
#296ATP
1429ELO
1397Clay ELO
28 yrs · 183 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWWWLLWWLW
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 4 March 2024
clay
USA
Noah Schachter
26 yrs · 188 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLWLWLWWWL
Kozlov S.
6-3 6-4
Schachter N.
Kozlov S.
662
Schachter N.
340

Stefan Kozlov defeated Noah Schachter 6-3 6-4 in the Kigali 2 CH round of 32 on clay.

Key context

  • Match story: Stefan Kozlov closed it out in two sets, 6–3 6–4.

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Kozlov S.serving68% hold

wins 57% of points on serve vs Schachter N.

Schachter N.serving57% hold

wins 53% of points on serve vs Kozlov S.

Baseline battle — serve is shaky, expect plenty of breaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Kozlov S.Schachter N.
1st serve in·Slight edge
64%
58%
1st serve points won·Even
66%
68%
2nd serve points won·Even
49%
45%
Service points won·Even
60%
59%
Return points won·Even
43%
39%
Break points saved·Even
58%
56%
Aces / match·Clear edge
2.2
4.5
Double faults / match·Slight edge
3.6
3.3

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (120 vs 49). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Kozlov S.
6.0
Even matchUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Schachter N.
6.2
Even matchUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Form & Matchup
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
3.9
Surface form
Fatigue & Travel
2.4
Minutes 14d
7.4
0.0
3-set count
6.0
Prev. match
9.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Kozlov S.Schachter N.
Freshness·
69
—

Kozlov S.: 4 days rest · 3 matches, 72 games (7d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Fastbig serves, short points
SlowFast
Final
Trungelliti M.[4]
Tabur C.[5]
6-46-2
Semi-finals
Trungelliti M.[4]
Majchrzak K.
6-36-4
Tabur C.[5]
Wenger D.
6-16-3
Quarter-finals
Tabur C.[5]
Hemery C.[3]
4-67-646-4
Wenger D.
Cukierman D.
1-66-37-62
Majchrzak K.
Kozlov S.
6-36-0
Trungelliti M.[4]
Safwat M.
1-66-26-1
R16
Hemery C.[3]
Denolly C.
6-30-0
Trungelliti M.[4]
Fancutt T.
6-36-3
Wenger D.
Ouakaa A.
3-66-43-0
Safwat M.
Paz J.
7-646-2
Majchrzak K.
Pichler D.
6-36-2
Kozlov S.
Lock B.[7]
7-625-76-4
Tabur C.[5]
Casanova H.
6-46-3
Cukierman D.
Ayeni O.
4-66-07-5
R32
Paz J.
Oliel Y.
6-26-2
Kozlov S.
Schachter N.
6-36-4
Ouakaa A.
Iradukunda G.
4-66-17-63
Casanova H.
Bax F.
6-46-4
Cukierman D.
Habiyambere E.
6-26-0
Majchrzak K.
Gakhov I.[1]
6-35-77-5
Pichler D.
El Sallaly A.
6-26-3
Lock B.[7]
Pennaforti G.
6-37-65
Trungelliti M.[4]
Brumm J.
7-56-2
Fancutt T.
Dev S.
6-27-5
Safwat M.
Houkes M.[8]
6-26-4
Tabur C.[5]
Voisin E.
6-16-4
Denolly C.
Sheehy J.
6-16-4
Hemery C.[3]
Bobrov B.
6-36-4
Wenger D.
Ionel N.[6]
7-56-1
Ayeni O.
Lyeons J.
6-46-3