Cem Ilkel vs Illya Marchenko — Lugano CH Qualifying Round 2

Lugano CH · CHALLENGER · Qualifying Round 2
Cem Ilkel
TUR11
Cem Ilkel
#1462ATP
30 yrs · 185 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLWLLLLWL
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 4 March 2024
hard
UKR1
Illya Marchenko
#1740ATP
38 yrs · 185 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWWLLLLLLL
Ilkel C.
7-6 7-6
Marchenko I.
Ilkel C.
78772
Marchenko I.
66620

Cem Ilkel defeated Illya Marchenko 7-6 7-6 in the Lugano CH qualifying round 2 on hard. The result followed the form book — Cem Ilkel came in ranked #1462, defending last year's final.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Ilkel C.serving82% hold

wins 64% of points on serve vs Marchenko I.

Marchenko I.serving82% hold

wins 64% of points on serve vs Ilkel C.

Even serve battle

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Ilkel C.Marchenko I.
1st serve in·Even
56%
56%
1st serve points won·Even
70%
71%
2nd serve points won·Even
48%
49%
Service points won·Even
60%
62%
Return points won·Even
37%
35%
Break points saved·Even
57%
57%
Aces / match·Slight edge
4.5
5.7
Double faults / match·Clear edge
2.3
3.3

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (35 vs 33). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Ilkel C.Marchenko I.
Clutch Rating·Clear edge
32
13
Break points saved·Dominant
49
80
Break points won·Even
3
7
Deciding sets·Dominant
70
14
Tiebreaks·Dominant
66
10

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Ilkel C.
6.6
Marginal edgeUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Marchenko I.
5.3
Clear underdogUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Form & Matchup
10.0No prior meetings
H2H
0.0
4.0
Surface form
2.9
0.0
Win streak
0.0Lost last 2
Fatigue & Travel
9.2
Minutes 14d
9.0
Prev. match
9.0
Context
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Conditions

Court speed
Fastbig serves, short points
SlowFast
Q2
Squire H.[8]
Shimizu Y.[3]
2-67-656-3
Masur D.
Bonadio R.[6]
6-36-2
Ilkel C.[11]
Marchenko I.[1]
7-667-62
Hsu Y.[2]
Gerasimov E.[12]
6-36-4
Berankis R.[4]
Celikbilek A.
3-67-56-4
Gea A.
Uchiyama Y.[5]
6-36-3
Q1
Marchenko I.[1]
Steinegger Y.
6-23-66-2
Gerasimov E.[12]
Margaroli L.
4-66-16-2
Ilkel C.[11]
Edmund K.
3-67-656-2
Hsu Y.[2]
Casanova A.
4-66-46-4
Shimizu Y.[3]
Haliak M.
6-46-4
Squire H.[8]
Gombos N.
7-646-3
Berankis R.[4]
Jebens H.
3-66-37-63
Celikbilek A.
Vesely J.[9]
4-66-36-3
Uchiyama Y.[5]
Paul J.
6-46-3
Gea A.
Copil M.[10]
6-46-4
Bonadio R.[6]
Bondioli F.
6-34-66-4
Masur D.
Bourgue M.[7]
6-26-4