Mikhail Kukushkin vs Yu Hsiou Hsu — Lugano CH Round of 32

Lugano CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 32
Mikhail Kukushkin
KAZ5
Mikhail Kukushkin
#316ATP
1552ELO
1526Hard ELO
38 yrs · 183 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLWLLWLWL
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 4 March 2024
hard
Yu Hsiou Hsu
TPE
Yu Hsiou Hsu
#210ATP
1489ELO
1468Hard ELO
27 yrs · 178 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLWLWLLWLW
Kukushkin M.
6-2 6-2
Hsu Y.
Kukushkin M.
662
Hsu Y.
220

Mikhail Kukushkin defeated Yu Hsiou Hsu 6-2 6-2 in the Lugano CH round of 32 on hard.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Kukushkin M.serving80% hold

wins 63% of points on serve vs Hsu Y.

Hsu Y.serving78% hold

wins 62% of points on serve vs Kukushkin M.

Even serve battle

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Kukushkin M.Hsu Y.
1st serve in·Even
66%
65%
1st serve points won·Even
68%
67%
2nd serve points won·Even
53%
50%
Service points won·Even
63%
61%
Return points won·Even
38%
39%
Break points saved·Even
61%
59%
Aces / match·Even
2.9
3.2
Double faults / match·Clear edge
1.0
2.3

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (164 vs 128). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Kukushkin M.Hsu Y.
Clutch Rating·Slight edge
46
36
Break points saved·Clear edge
93
74
Break points won·Dominant
41
4
Deciding sets·Slight edge
41
50
Tiebreaks·Dominant
44
77

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Kukushkin M.
7.3
Strong advantageUmpiry Score
Hsu Y.
5.3
Clear underdogUmpiry Score
Form & Matchup
5.6+57 Hard Elo edge
Surface ELO
4.4Hard Elo 1468
5.6Overall Elo 1552
ELO gap
4.4Overall Elo 1489
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
8.4
Surface form
2.1
9.07-match win streak
Win streak
0.0Lost last 6
Fatigue & Travel
Minutes 14d
7.4
3-set count
7.0
9.0
Prev. match
7.0
Context
6.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Conditions

Court speed
Fastbig serves, short points
SlowFast
Final
Virtanen O.[2]
Masur D.
6-746-47-63
Semi-finals
Virtanen O.[2]
Molleker R.
6-16-3
Masur D.
Bergs Z.[1]
6-26-4
Quarter-finals
Masur D.
Albot R.[3]
7-607-64
Bergs Z.[1]
Kukushkin M.[5]
6-36-4
Molleker R.
Brouwer G.
6-47-64
Virtanen O.[2]
Herbert P.[6]
6-36-2
R16
Molleker R.
Choinski J.[8]
7-656-4
Bergs Z.[1]
Squire H.
7-656-2
Albot R.[3]
Ritschard A.
1-66-46-4
Herbert P.[6]
Escoffier A.
7-634-66-2
Kukushkin M.[5]
Harris B.
2-66-36-1
Masur D.
Gea A.
6-36-3
Brouwer G.
Blockx A.
6-36-1
Virtanen O.[2]
Ilkel C.
6-26-1
R32
Ilkel C.
Nikles J.
6-06-3
Herbert P.[6]
Shimizu Y.
6-34-66-1
Ritschard A.
Berankis R.
4-66-16-4
Molleker R.
Shimabukuro S.
6-46-4
Gea A.
Harris L.
6-46-3
Masur D.
Mpetshi Perricard G.[7]
6-46-4
Kukushkin M.[5]
Hsu Y.
6-26-2
Blockx A.
Riedi L.[4]
3-67-667-5
Bergs Z.[1]
Travaglia S.
6-26-3
Squire H.
Brunold M.
7-626-4
Harris B.
Bellucci M.
6-776-46-4
Albot R.[3]
Huesler M.
6-46-3
Choinski J.[8]
Wong C.
3-66-36-4
Brouwer G.
Blanchet U.
7-56-4
Escoffier A.
Yunchaokete B.
6-46-0
Virtanen O.[2]
Bertola R.
7-56-3