Kamil Majchrzak vs Ivan Gakhov — Kigali 2 CH Round of 32

Kigali 2 CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 32
Kamil Majchrzak
POL
Kamil Majchrzak
#66ATP
1801ELO
1723Clay ELO
$617kYTD
$3.8MCAREER
30 yrs · 180 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLWWWWWLW
2 — 1
Sets
Monday, 4 March 2024
clay
Ivan Gakhov
RUS1
Ivan Gakhov
#388ATP
1430ELO
1384Clay ELO
29 yrs · 191 cm · Left-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLWLWLLLLW
Majchrzak K.
6-3 5-7 7-5
Gakhov I.
Majchrzak K.
6572
Gakhov I.
3751

Kamil Majchrzak defeated Ivan Gakhov 6-3 5-7 7-5 in the Kigali 2 CH round of 32 on clay. The result followed the form book — Kamil Majchrzak came in ranked #66.

Key context

  • Match story: Kamil Majchrzak closed it out in three sets, 6–3 5–7 7–5.

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Majchrzak K.serving82% hold

wins 64% of points on serve vs Gakhov I.

Gakhov I.serving70% hold

wins 58% of points on serve vs Majchrzak K.

Serve advantage — Majchrzak K.

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Majchrzak K.Gakhov I.
1st serve in·Even
62%
60%
1st serve points won·Even
73%
69%
2nd serve points won·Slight edge
53%
48%
Service points won·Slight edge
66%
61%
Return points won·Even
39%
38%
Break points saved·Slight edge
66%
61%
Aces / match·Slight edge
5.4
4.3
Double faults / match·Dominant
1.5
3.5

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (137 vs 127). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Majchrzak K.Gakhov I.
Clutch Rating·Dominant
68
34
Break points saved·Clear edge
97
82
Break points won·Dominant
51
9
Deciding sets·Clear edge
73
59
Tiebreaks·Dominant
75
22

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Majchrzak K.
8.1
Dominant favouriteUmpiry Score
Gakhov I.
2.9
Heavy underdogUmpiry Score
  • Recent retirement (−1.5)
Form & Matchup
9.1+339 Clay Elo edge
Surface ELO
0.9Clay Elo 1384
9.1Overall Elo 1801
ELO gap
0.9Overall Elo 1430
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
7.8
Surface form
2.9
9.06-match win streak
Win streak
0.0Lost last 3
Fatigue & Travel
5.5
Minutes 14d
7.8
7.0
3-set count
7.0
7.0
Prev. match
6.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Majchrzak K.Gakhov I.
Freshness·
92
—

Majchrzak K.: 12 days rest · 2 matches (14d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Fastbig serves, short points
SlowFast
Final
Trungelliti M.[4]
Tabur C.[5]
6-46-2
Semi-finals
Trungelliti M.[4]
Majchrzak K.
6-36-4
Tabur C.[5]
Wenger D.
6-16-3
Quarter-finals
Tabur C.[5]
Hemery C.[3]
4-67-646-4
Wenger D.
Cukierman D.
1-66-37-62
Majchrzak K.
Kozlov S.
6-36-0
Trungelliti M.[4]
Safwat M.
1-66-26-1
R16
Hemery C.[3]
Denolly C.
6-30-0
Trungelliti M.[4]
Fancutt T.
6-36-3
Wenger D.
Ouakaa A.
3-66-43-0
Safwat M.
Paz J.
7-646-2
Majchrzak K.
Pichler D.
6-36-2
Kozlov S.
Lock B.[7]
7-625-76-4
Tabur C.[5]
Casanova H.
6-46-3
Cukierman D.
Ayeni O.
4-66-07-5
R32
Paz J.
Oliel Y.
6-26-2
Kozlov S.
Schachter N.
6-36-4
Ouakaa A.
Iradukunda G.
4-66-17-63
Casanova H.
Bax F.
6-46-4
Cukierman D.
Habiyambere E.
6-26-0
Majchrzak K.
Gakhov I.[1]
6-35-77-5
Pichler D.
El Sallaly A.
6-26-3
Lock B.[7]
Pennaforti G.
6-37-65
Trungelliti M.[4]
Brumm J.
7-56-2
Fancutt T.
Dev S.
6-27-5
Safwat M.
Houkes M.[8]
6-26-4
Tabur C.[5]
Voisin E.
6-16-4
Denolly C.
Sheehy J.
6-16-4
Hemery C.[3]
Bobrov B.
6-36-4
Wenger D.
Ionel N.[6]
7-56-1
Ayeni O.
Lyeons J.
6-46-3