Marco Trungelliti vs Thomas Fancutt — Kigali 2 CH Round of 16

Kigali 2 CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 16
Marco Trungelliti
ARG4
Marco Trungelliti
#99ATP
1627ELO
1621Clay ELO
$395kYTD
$2.6MCAREER
36 yrs · 178 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
WLLLWLWLWW
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 4 March 2024
clay
Thomas Fancutt
AUS
Thomas Fancutt
#851ATP
31 yrs · 188 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
WWLWWLWLLW
Trungelliti M.
6-3 6-3
Fancutt T.
Trungelliti M.
662
Fancutt T.
330

Marco Trungelliti defeated Thomas Fancutt 6-3 6-3 in the Kigali 2 CH round of 16 on clay. The result followed the form book — Marco Trungelliti came in ranked #99.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Trungelliti M.serving78% hold

wins 62% of points on serve vs Fancutt T.

Fancutt T.serving72% hold

wins 59% of points on serve vs Trungelliti M.

Serve advantage — Trungelliti M.

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Trungelliti M.Fancutt T.
1st serve in·Even
60%
57%
1st serve points won·Even
69%
73%
2nd serve points won·Even
50%
50%
Service points won·Even
61%
63%
Return points won·Slight edge
40%
35%
Break points saved·Even
62%
63%
Aces / match·Dominant
3.5
8.5
Double faults / match·Clear edge
3.4
4.6

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (177 vs 28). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Trungelliti M.Fancutt T.
Clutch Rating·Dominant
50
24
Break points saved·Dominant
87
62
Break points won·Slight edge
24
17
Deciding sets·Dominant
87
56
Tiebreaks·Clear edge
19
5

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Trungelliti M.
6.5
Marginal edgeUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Fancutt T.
4.6
Heavy underdogUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
  • Extended break: 35 days (−0.7)
Form & Matchup
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
5.9
Surface form
0.0
Win streak
0.0
Fatigue & Travel
4.7
Minutes 14d
7.0
3-set count
9.0
Prev. match
Surface transition
6.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Trungelliti M.Fancutt T.
Freshness·Dominant
89
61

Trungelliti M.: 1 day rest · 1 match, 17 games (7d) · Fancutt T.: 1 day rest · 2 matches, 61 games (7d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Fastbig serves, short points
SlowFast
Final
Trungelliti M.[4]
Tabur C.[5]
6-46-2
Semi-finals
Trungelliti M.[4]
Majchrzak K.
6-36-4
Tabur C.[5]
Wenger D.
6-16-3
Quarter-finals
Tabur C.[5]
Hemery C.[3]
4-67-646-4
Wenger D.
Cukierman D.
1-66-37-62
Majchrzak K.
Kozlov S.
6-36-0
Trungelliti M.[4]
Safwat M.
1-66-26-1
R16
Hemery C.[3]
Denolly C.
6-30-0
Trungelliti M.[4]
Fancutt T.
6-36-3
Wenger D.
Ouakaa A.
3-66-43-0
Safwat M.
Paz J.
7-646-2
Majchrzak K.
Pichler D.
6-36-2
Kozlov S.
Lock B.[7]
7-625-76-4
Tabur C.[5]
Casanova H.
6-46-3
Cukierman D.
Ayeni O.
4-66-07-5
R32
Paz J.
Oliel Y.
6-26-2
Kozlov S.
Schachter N.
6-36-4
Ouakaa A.
Iradukunda G.
4-66-17-63
Casanova H.
Bax F.
6-46-4
Cukierman D.
Habiyambere E.
6-26-0
Majchrzak K.
Gakhov I.[1]
6-35-77-5
Pichler D.
El Sallaly A.
6-26-3
Lock B.[7]
Pennaforti G.
6-37-65
Trungelliti M.[4]
Brumm J.
7-56-2
Fancutt T.
Dev S.
6-27-5
Safwat M.
Houkes M.[8]
6-26-4
Tabur C.[5]
Voisin E.
6-16-4
Denolly C.
Sheehy J.
6-16-4
Hemery C.[3]
Bobrov B.
6-36-4
Wenger D.
Ionel N.[6]
7-56-1
Ayeni O.
Lyeons J.
6-46-3