Clement Tabur vs Hernan Casanova — Kigali 2 CH Round of 16

Kigali 2 CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 16
Clement Tabur
FRA5
Clement Tabur
#189ATP
1607ELO
1553Clay ELO
$199kYTD
$640kCAREER
26 yrs · 173 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLWWLWLWWL
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 4 March 2024
clay
Hernan Casanova
ARG
Hernan Casanova
#409ATP
1393ELO
1381Clay ELO
32 yrs · 178 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
WWLWWWWLWL
Tabur C.
6-4 6-3
Casanova H.
Tabur C.
662
Casanova H.
430

Clement Tabur defeated Hernan Casanova 6-4 6-3 in the Kigali 2 CH round of 16 on clay.

Key context

  • Match story: Clement Tabur closed it out in two sets, 6–4 6–3.

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Tabur C.serving61% hold

wins 55% of points on serve vs Casanova H.

Casanova H.serving61% hold

wins 55% of points on serve vs Tabur C.

Baseline battle — serve is shaky, expect plenty of breaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Tabur C.Casanova H.
1st serve in·Clear edge
61%
75%
1st serve points won·Slight edge
70%
61%
2nd serve points won·Even
50%
49%
Service points won·Even
62%
58%
Return points won·Even
40%
44%
Break points saved·Even
60%
56%
Aces / match·Dominant
3.5
0.5
Double faults / match·Clear edge
2.8
1.3

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (130 vs 74). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Tabur C.Casanova H.
Clutch Rating·Clear edge
29
8
Break points saved·Dominant
74
24
Break points won·Even
23
22
Deciding sets·Even
33
32
Tiebreaks·Slight edge
40
35

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Tabur C.
6.3
Marginal edgeUmpiry Score
Casanova H.
5.2
Clear underdogUmpiry Score
Form & Matchup
6.9+172 Clay Elo edge
Surface ELO
3.1Clay Elo 1381
7.5Overall Elo 1607
ELO gap
2.5Overall Elo 1393
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
4.3
Surface form
3.5
0.0Lost last 4
Win streak
0.0Lost last 2
Fatigue & Travel
8.4
Minutes 14d
8.8
6.0
Prev. match
7.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Tabur C.Casanova H.
Freshness·Dominant
85
55

Tabur C.: 3 days rest · 1 match, 26 games (7d) · Casanova H.: 1 day rest · 5 matches, 120 games (7d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Fastbig serves, short points
SlowFast
Final
Trungelliti M.[4]
Tabur C.[5]
6-46-2
Semi-finals
Trungelliti M.[4]
Majchrzak K.
6-36-4
Tabur C.[5]
Wenger D.
6-16-3
Quarter-finals
Tabur C.[5]
Hemery C.[3]
4-67-646-4
Wenger D.
Cukierman D.
1-66-37-62
Majchrzak K.
Kozlov S.
6-36-0
Trungelliti M.[4]
Safwat M.
1-66-26-1
R16
Hemery C.[3]
Denolly C.
6-30-0
Trungelliti M.[4]
Fancutt T.
6-36-3
Wenger D.
Ouakaa A.
3-66-43-0
Safwat M.
Paz J.
7-646-2
Majchrzak K.
Pichler D.
6-36-2
Kozlov S.
Lock B.[7]
7-625-76-4
Tabur C.[5]
Casanova H.
6-46-3
Cukierman D.
Ayeni O.
4-66-07-5
R32
Paz J.
Oliel Y.
6-26-2
Kozlov S.
Schachter N.
6-36-4
Ouakaa A.
Iradukunda G.
4-66-17-63
Casanova H.
Bax F.
6-46-4
Cukierman D.
Habiyambere E.
6-26-0
Majchrzak K.
Gakhov I.[1]
6-35-77-5
Pichler D.
El Sallaly A.
6-26-3
Lock B.[7]
Pennaforti G.
6-37-65
Trungelliti M.[4]
Brumm J.
7-56-2
Fancutt T.
Dev S.
6-27-5
Safwat M.
Houkes M.[8]
6-26-4
Tabur C.[5]
Voisin E.
6-16-4
Denolly C.
Sheehy J.
6-16-4
Hemery C.[3]
Bobrov B.
6-36-4
Wenger D.
Ionel N.[6]
7-56-1
Ayeni O.
Lyeons J.
6-46-3