Camilo Ugo Carabelli vs Murkel Alejandro Dellien Velasco — Santa Cruz De La Sierra CH Final

Santa Cruz De La Sierra CH · CHALLENGER · Final
Camilo Ugo Carabelli
ARG3
Camilo Ugo Carabelli
#59ATP
1759ELO
1741Clay ELO
$653kYTD
$2.7MCAREER
27 yrs · 185 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLWLWWLWLW
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 4 March 2024
clay
BOL
Murkel Alejandro Dellien Velasco
1379ELO
1368Clay ELO
28 yrs · 193 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLWLLWWLL
Ugo Carabelli C.
6-4 6-2
Dellien Velasco M.
Ugo Carabelli C.
662
Dellien Velasco M.
420

Camilo Ugo Carabelli defeated Murkel Alejandro Dellien Velasco 6-4 6-2 in the Santa Cruz De La Sierra CH final on clay. The result followed the form book — Camilo Ugo Carabelli came in defending last year's round of 16.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Ugo Carabelli C.serving61% hold

wins 54% of points on serve vs Dellien Velasco M.

Dellien Velasco M.serving61% hold

wins 54% of points on serve vs Ugo Carabelli C.

Baseline battle — serve is shaky, expect plenty of breaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Serve & return on clay

Ugo Carabelli C.Dellien Velasco M.
24
Serve
—
36
Return
—

Per-surface Serve / Return Rating (0–100, percentile within the clay field, opponent-adjusted over 52 weeks). About

Statistics

This season
Ugo Carabelli C.Dellien Velasco M.
1st serve in·Even
62%
65%
1st serve points won·Even
67%
64%
2nd serve points won·Even
48%
48%
Service points won·Even
60%
58%
Return points won·Even
40%
42%
Break points saved·Slight edge
61%
56%
Aces / match·Slight edge
2.7
1.8
Double faults / match·Slight edge
2.4
2.8

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (175 vs 159). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Ugo Carabelli C.Dellien Velasco M.
Clutch Rating·Dominant
78
19
Break points saved·Dominant
90
28
Break points won·Dominant
62
19
Deciding sets·Dominant
96
63
Tiebreaks·Dominant
72
28

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Ugo Carabelli C.
8.1
Dominant favouriteUmpiry Score
Dellien Velasco M.
5.4
Clear underdogUmpiry Score
Form & Matchup
9.8+372 Clay Elo edge
Surface ELO
0.2Clay Elo 1368
9.7Overall Elo 1759
ELO gap
0.3Overall Elo 1379
6.1No prior meetings
H2H
3.9
7.5
Surface form
7.1
0.0Lost last 2
Win streak
0.0
Fatigue & Travel
9.0
Minutes 14d
8.2
8.0
Prev. match
8.0
Context
6.0
Defending pts
6.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Ugo Carabelli C.Dellien Velasco M.
Freshness·
97
—

Ugo Carabelli C.: 13 days rest · 1 match (14d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Medium-slowfavours grinders
SlowFast
Final
Ugo Carabelli C.[3]
Dellien Velasco M.
6-46-2
Cerundolo J.[1]
Guillen Meza A.[5]
3-66-16-4
Semi-finals
Dellien Velasco M.
Olivo R.
6-12-64-2
Ugo Carabelli C.[3]
Monteiro T.[1]
6-47-5
Cerundolo J.[1]
Habib H.[4]
7-646-4
Guillen Meza A.[5]
Mena F.[8]
3-66-36-3
Quarter-finals
Monteiro T.[1]
Sakamoto P.
6-16-4
Ugo Carabelli C.[3]
Oliveira G.
4-67-616-1
Dellien Velasco M.
Burruchaga R.[5]
6-22-66-4
Olivo R.
Cerundolo J.[6]
6-37-64
Guillen Meza A.[5]
Johns G.
6-24-66-3
Cerundolo J.[1]
Sakamoto P.[6]
6-46-3
Habib H.[4]
Prado Angelo J.
7-634-67-5
Mena F.[8]
Aboian L.
6-36-2
R16
Olivo R.
Comesana F.[2]
W/O
Monteiro T.[1]
Aboian V.
6-36-3
Sakamoto P.
Pucinelli De Almeida M.
5-76-06-4
Ugo Carabelli C.[3]
Prado Angelo J.
7-636-1
Oliveira G.
Olivieri G.[7]
6-46-2
Burruchaga R.[5]
Mager G.
7-6106-1
Dellien Velasco M.
Draxl L.
6-33-67-5
Cerundolo J.[6]
Boitan G.
6-36-1
Aboian L.
Collarini A.[3]
6-31-2
Cerundolo J.[1]
Pereira J.
6-47-5
Habib H.[4]
Soto M.
7-627-5
Mena F.[8]
Lingua Lavallen A.
6-27-5
Sakamoto P.[6]
Casanova H.
6-36-737-63
Prado Angelo J.
Olivo R.[7]
6-23-66-3
Guillen Meza A.[5]
Torres J.
7-56-726-1
Johns G.
Dellien Velasco M.[2]
0-66-47-64
R32
Ugo Carabelli C.[3]
Vallejo A.
7-6105-74-0
Aboian V.
Jubb P.
6-35-76-3
Comesana F.[2]
Sekulic P.
6-756-36-1
Boitan G.
Villanueva G.
6-06-3
Sakamoto P.
Cecchinato M.[8]
6-46-4
Monteiro T.[1]
Lavagno E.
6-26-2
Cerundolo J.[6]
Justo G.
6-36-2
Olivieri G.[7]
Passaro F.
6-26-2
Pucinelli De Almeida M.
Collarini A.
6-16-1
Prado Angelo J.
Gomez F.
6-46-0
Oliveira G.
Weis A.
6-36-3
Burruchaga R.[5]
Kestelboim M.
6-26-4
Mager G.
Bueno G.
6-16-1
Draxl L.
Bicknell B.
3-66-26-3
Dellien Velasco M.
Dellien H.[4]
7-56-1
Olivo R.
Torres J.
6-36-1
Cerundolo J.[1]
Midon L.
1-66-17-5
Pereira J.
Boscardin Dias P.
6-46-2
Lingua Lavallen A.
Villanueva G.
6-46-2
Mena F.[8]
Zanellato N.
7-666-1
Torres J.
Justo G.
7-56-1
Johns G.
Garcia R.
6-46-1
Dellien Velasco M.[2]
Barreto Sanchez D.
6-16-0
Casanova H.
Reis Da Silva J.
6-26-2
Sakamoto P.[6]
Aboian V.
7-656-766-4
Habib H.[4]
Pucinelli De Almeida M.
6-37-64
Soto M.
Schachter N.
3-66-36-3
Prado Angelo J.
Blanch D.
4-66-46-3
Olivo R.[7]
Cuellar Lorberg A.
6-26-2
Aboian L.
Blanch U.
7-656-4
Collarini A.[3]
Gomez E.
6-27-5
Guillen Meza A.[5]
Soriano Barrera A.
7-656-3