Camilo Ugo Carabelli vs Adolfo Daniel Vallejo — Santa Cruz De La Sierra CH Round of 32

Santa Cruz De La Sierra CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 32
Camilo Ugo Carabelli
ARG3
Camilo Ugo Carabelli
#59ATP
1759ELO
1741Clay ELO
$653kYTD
$2.7MCAREER
27 yrs · 185 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLWLWWLWLW
0 — 0
Sets
Retired
Monday, 4 March 2024
clay
Adolfo Daniel Vallejo
PAR
Adolfo Daniel Vallejo
#72ATP
1740ELO
1708Clay ELO
$396kYTD
$653kCAREER
22 yrs · 183 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLLLWLWWW
Ugo Carabelli C.
7-6 5-7 4-0
Vallejo A.
Ugo Carabelli C.
71254–
Vallejo A.
61070–

Camilo Ugo Carabelli advanced when Adolfo Daniel Vallejo retired 7-6 5-7 4-0 in the Santa Cruz De La Sierra CH round of 32.

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Ugo Carabelli C.serving59% hold

wins 54% of points on serve vs Vallejo A.

Vallejo A.serving66% hold

wins 56% of points on serve vs Ugo Carabelli C.

Baseline battle — serve is shaky, expect plenty of breaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Serve & return on clay

Ugo Carabelli C.Vallejo A.
24
Serve
—
36
Return
—

Per-surface Serve / Return Rating (0–100, percentile within the clay field, opponent-adjusted over 52 weeks). About

Statistics

This season
Ugo Carabelli C.Vallejo A.
1st serve in·Even
63%
62%
1st serve points won·Even
67%
65%
2nd serve points won·Even
48%
51%
Service points won·Even
60%
60%
Return points won·Even
40%
43%
Break points saved·Even
61%
59%
Aces / match·Even
2.7
2.3
Double faults / match·Slight edge
2.4
2.8

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (175 vs 147). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Ugo Carabelli C.Vallejo A.
Clutch Rating·Dominant
78
53
Break points saved·Clear edge
90
71
Break points won·Even
62
65
Deciding sets·Slight edge
96
85
Tiebreaks·Dominant
72
0

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Ugo Carabelli C.
6.9
Slight advantageUmpiry Score
Vallejo A.
4.5
Heavy underdogUmpiry Score
  • Extended break: 56 days (−0.7)
Form & Matchup
5.3+32 Clay Elo edge
Surface ELO
4.7Clay Elo 1708
5.1Overall Elo 1759
ELO gap
4.9Overall Elo 1740
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
7.5
Surface form
3.3
0.0Lost last 2
Win streak
0.0
Fatigue & Travel
9.0
Minutes 14d
8.0
Prev. match
Context
6.0
Defending pts
6.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Ugo Carabelli C.Vallejo A.
Freshness·Clear edge
97
83

Ugo Carabelli C.: 13 days rest · 1 match (14d) · Vallejo A.: 3 days rest · 2 matches, 32 games (7d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Medium-slowfavours grinders
SlowFast
Final
Ugo Carabelli C.[3]
Dellien Velasco M.
6-46-2
Cerundolo J.[1]
Guillen Meza A.[5]
3-66-16-4
Semi-finals
Dellien Velasco M.
Olivo R.
6-12-64-2
Ugo Carabelli C.[3]
Monteiro T.[1]
6-47-5
Cerundolo J.[1]
Habib H.[4]
7-646-4
Guillen Meza A.[5]
Mena F.[8]
3-66-36-3
Quarter-finals
Monteiro T.[1]
Sakamoto P.
6-16-4
Ugo Carabelli C.[3]
Oliveira G.
4-67-616-1
Dellien Velasco M.
Burruchaga R.[5]
6-22-66-4
Olivo R.
Cerundolo J.[6]
6-37-64
Guillen Meza A.[5]
Johns G.
6-24-66-3
Cerundolo J.[1]
Sakamoto P.[6]
6-46-3
Habib H.[4]
Prado Angelo J.
7-634-67-5
Mena F.[8]
Aboian L.
6-36-2
R16
Olivo R.
Comesana F.[2]
W/O
Monteiro T.[1]
Aboian V.
6-36-3
Sakamoto P.
Pucinelli De Almeida M.
5-76-06-4
Ugo Carabelli C.[3]
Prado Angelo J.
7-636-1
Oliveira G.
Olivieri G.[7]
6-46-2
Burruchaga R.[5]
Mager G.
7-6106-1
Dellien Velasco M.
Draxl L.
6-33-67-5
Cerundolo J.[6]
Boitan G.
6-36-1
Aboian L.
Collarini A.[3]
6-31-2
Cerundolo J.[1]
Pereira J.
6-47-5
Habib H.[4]
Soto M.
7-627-5
Mena F.[8]
Lingua Lavallen A.
6-27-5
Sakamoto P.[6]
Casanova H.
6-36-737-63
Prado Angelo J.
Olivo R.[7]
6-23-66-3
Guillen Meza A.[5]
Torres J.
7-56-726-1
Johns G.
Dellien Velasco M.[2]
0-66-47-64
R32
Ugo Carabelli C.[3]
Vallejo A.
7-6105-74-0
Aboian V.
Jubb P.
6-35-76-3
Comesana F.[2]
Sekulic P.
6-756-36-1
Boitan G.
Villanueva G.
6-06-3
Sakamoto P.
Cecchinato M.[8]
6-46-4
Monteiro T.[1]
Lavagno E.
6-26-2
Cerundolo J.[6]
Justo G.
6-36-2
Olivieri G.[7]
Passaro F.
6-26-2
Pucinelli De Almeida M.
Collarini A.
6-16-1
Prado Angelo J.
Gomez F.
6-46-0
Oliveira G.
Weis A.
6-36-3
Burruchaga R.[5]
Kestelboim M.
6-26-4
Mager G.
Bueno G.
6-16-1
Draxl L.
Bicknell B.
3-66-26-3
Dellien Velasco M.
Dellien H.[4]
7-56-1
Olivo R.
Torres J.
6-36-1
Cerundolo J.[1]
Midon L.
1-66-17-5
Pereira J.
Boscardin Dias P.
6-46-2
Lingua Lavallen A.
Villanueva G.
6-46-2
Mena F.[8]
Zanellato N.
7-666-1
Torres J.
Justo G.
7-56-1
Johns G.
Garcia R.
6-46-1
Dellien Velasco M.[2]
Barreto Sanchez D.
6-16-0
Casanova H.
Reis Da Silva J.
6-26-2
Sakamoto P.[6]
Aboian V.
7-656-766-4
Habib H.[4]
Pucinelli De Almeida M.
6-37-64
Soto M.
Schachter N.
3-66-36-3
Prado Angelo J.
Blanch D.
4-66-46-3
Olivo R.[7]
Cuellar Lorberg A.
6-26-2
Aboian L.
Blanch U.
7-656-4
Collarini A.[3]
Gomez E.
6-27-5
Guillen Meza A.[5]
Soriano Barrera A.
7-656-3