Murkel Alejandro Dellien Velasco vs Roman Andres Burruchaga — Santa Cruz De La Sierra CH Quarter-final

Santa Cruz De La Sierra CH · CHALLENGER · Quarter-final
BOL
Murkel Alejandro Dellien Velasco
1379ELO
1368Clay ELO
28 yrs · 193 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLWLLWWLL
2 — 1
Sets
Monday, 4 March 2024
clay
Roman Andres Burruchaga
ARG5
Roman Andres Burruchaga
#65ATP
1711ELO
1694Clay ELO
$446kYTD
$1.2MCAREER
24 yrs · 183 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLLWLLWLW
Dellien Velasco M.
6-2 2-6 6-4
Burruchaga R.
Dellien Velasco M.
6262
Burruchaga R.
2641

Murkel Alejandro Dellien Velasco defeated Roman Andres Burruchaga 6-2 2-6 6-4 in the Santa Cruz De La Sierra CH quarter-final on clay. The upset overturned the form book — Roman Andres Burruchaga came in defending last year's round of 32, but Murkel Alejandro Dellien Velasco had been the form player, winning 4 of their last 8 on clay.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Dellien Velasco M.serving54% hold

wins 52% of points on serve vs Burruchaga R.

Burruchaga R.serving61% hold

wins 54% of points on serve vs Dellien Velasco M.

Baseline battle — serve is shaky, expect plenty of breaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Dellien Velasco M.Burruchaga R.
1st serve in·Even
65%
61%
1st serve points won·Even
64%
67%
2nd serve points won·Even
47%
49%
Service points won·Even
58%
60%
Return points won·Even
42%
43%
Break points saved·Even
56%
58%
Aces / match·Even
1.8
2.2
Double faults / match·Slight edge
2.8
3.5

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (159 vs 190). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Dellien Velasco M.Burruchaga R.
Clutch Rating·Dominant
19
67
Break points saved·Dominant
28
68
Break points won·Dominant
19
73
Deciding sets·Clear edge
63
84
Tiebreaks·Dominant
28
65

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Dellien Velasco M.
5.5
Slight disadvantageUmpiry Score
Burruchaga R.
7.7
Dominant favouriteUmpiry Score
Form & Matchup
0.4Clay Elo 1368
Surface ELO
9.6+326 Clay Elo edge
0.3Overall Elo 1379
ELO gap
9.7Overall Elo 1711
4.6No prior meetings
H2H
5.4
7.1
Surface form
6.1
0.0
Win streak
0.0
Fatigue & Travel
8.2
Minutes 14d
6.6
3-set count
7.0
8.0
Prev. match
8.0
Context
6.0
Defending pts
6.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Dellien Velasco M.Burruchaga R.
Freshness·
—
91

Burruchaga R.: 5 days rest · 1 match, 18 games (7d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Medium-slowfavours grinders
SlowFast
Final
Ugo Carabelli C.[3]
Dellien Velasco M.
6-46-2
Cerundolo J.[1]
Guillen Meza A.[5]
3-66-16-4
Semi-finals
Dellien Velasco M.
Olivo R.
6-12-64-2
Ugo Carabelli C.[3]
Monteiro T.[1]
6-47-5
Cerundolo J.[1]
Habib H.[4]
7-646-4
Guillen Meza A.[5]
Mena F.[8]
3-66-36-3
Quarter-finals
Monteiro T.[1]
Sakamoto P.
6-16-4
Ugo Carabelli C.[3]
Oliveira G.
4-67-616-1
Dellien Velasco M.
Burruchaga R.[5]
6-22-66-4
Olivo R.
Cerundolo J.[6]
6-37-64
Guillen Meza A.[5]
Johns G.
6-24-66-3
Cerundolo J.[1]
Sakamoto P.[6]
6-46-3
Habib H.[4]
Prado Angelo J.
7-634-67-5
Mena F.[8]
Aboian L.
6-36-2
R16
Olivo R.
Comesana F.[2]
W/O
Monteiro T.[1]
Aboian V.
6-36-3
Sakamoto P.
Pucinelli De Almeida M.
5-76-06-4
Ugo Carabelli C.[3]
Prado Angelo J.
7-636-1
Oliveira G.
Olivieri G.[7]
6-46-2
Burruchaga R.[5]
Mager G.
7-6106-1
Dellien Velasco M.
Draxl L.
6-33-67-5
Cerundolo J.[6]
Boitan G.
6-36-1
Aboian L.
Collarini A.[3]
6-31-2
Cerundolo J.[1]
Pereira J.
6-47-5
Habib H.[4]
Soto M.
7-627-5
Mena F.[8]
Lingua Lavallen A.
6-27-5
Sakamoto P.[6]
Casanova H.
6-36-737-63
Prado Angelo J.
Olivo R.[7]
6-23-66-3
Guillen Meza A.[5]
Torres J.
7-56-726-1
Johns G.
Dellien Velasco M.[2]
0-66-47-64
R32
Ugo Carabelli C.[3]
Vallejo A.
7-6105-74-0
Aboian V.
Jubb P.
6-35-76-3
Comesana F.[2]
Sekulic P.
6-756-36-1
Boitan G.
Villanueva G.
6-06-3
Sakamoto P.
Cecchinato M.[8]
6-46-4
Monteiro T.[1]
Lavagno E.
6-26-2
Cerundolo J.[6]
Justo G.
6-36-2
Olivieri G.[7]
Passaro F.
6-26-2
Pucinelli De Almeida M.
Collarini A.
6-16-1
Prado Angelo J.
Gomez F.
6-46-0
Oliveira G.
Weis A.
6-36-3
Burruchaga R.[5]
Kestelboim M.
6-26-4
Mager G.
Bueno G.
6-16-1
Draxl L.
Bicknell B.
3-66-26-3
Dellien Velasco M.
Dellien H.[4]
7-56-1
Olivo R.
Torres J.
6-36-1
Cerundolo J.[1]
Midon L.
1-66-17-5
Pereira J.
Boscardin Dias P.
6-46-2
Lingua Lavallen A.
Villanueva G.
6-46-2
Mena F.[8]
Zanellato N.
7-666-1
Torres J.
Justo G.
7-56-1
Johns G.
Garcia R.
6-46-1
Dellien Velasco M.[2]
Barreto Sanchez D.
6-16-0
Casanova H.
Reis Da Silva J.
6-26-2
Sakamoto P.[6]
Aboian V.
7-656-766-4
Habib H.[4]
Pucinelli De Almeida M.
6-37-64
Soto M.
Schachter N.
3-66-36-3
Prado Angelo J.
Blanch D.
4-66-46-3
Olivo R.[7]
Cuellar Lorberg A.
6-26-2
Aboian L.
Blanch U.
7-656-4
Collarini A.[3]
Gomez E.
6-27-5
Guillen Meza A.[5]
Soriano Barrera A.
7-656-3