Roman Andres Burruchaga vs Mariano Kestelboim — Santa Cruz De La Sierra CH Round of 32

Santa Cruz De La Sierra CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 32
Roman Andres Burruchaga
ARG5
Roman Andres Burruchaga
#65ATP
1711ELO
1694Clay ELO
$446kYTD
$1.2MCAREER
24 yrs · 183 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLLWLLWLW
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 4 March 2024
clay
Mariano Kestelboim
ARG
Mariano Kestelboim
#686ATP
1198ELO
1189Clay ELO
30 yrs · 185 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLWWLLLLLW
Burruchaga R.
6-2 6-4
Kestelboim M.
Burruchaga R.
662
Kestelboim M.
240

Roman Andres Burruchaga defeated Mariano Kestelboim 6-2 6-4 in the Santa Cruz De La Sierra CH round of 32 on clay. The result followed the form book — Roman Andres Burruchaga came in ranked #65, defending last year's round of 32.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Burruchaga R.serving59% hold

wins 54% of points on serve vs Kestelboim M.

Kestelboim M.serving51% hold

wins 51% of points on serve vs Burruchaga R.

Baseline battle — serve is shaky, expect plenty of breaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Burruchaga R.Kestelboim M.
1st serve in·Slight edge
61%
66%
1st serve points won·Slight edge
67%
62%
2nd serve points won·Even
49%
49%
Service points won·Even
60%
57%
Return points won·Even
43%
43%
Break points saved·Slight edge
58%
53%
Aces / match·Slight edge
2.2
1.6
Double faults / match·Clear edge
3.5
2.5

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (190 vs 78). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Burruchaga R.Kestelboim M.
Clutch Rating·Dominant
67
14
Break points saved·Dominant
68
7
Break points won·Dominant
73
18
Deciding sets·Clear edge
84
68
Tiebreaks·
65
—

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Burruchaga R.
7.8
Dominant favouriteUmpiry Score
Kestelboim M.
3.7
Heavy underdogUmpiry Score
  • Extended break: 35 days (−0.7)
Form & Matchup
10.0+505 Clay Elo edge
Surface ELO
0.0Clay Elo 1189
10.0Overall Elo 1711
ELO gap
0.0Overall Elo 1198
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
6.1
Surface form
5.1
0.0
Win streak
0.0
Fatigue & Travel
6.6
Minutes 14d
7.0
3-set count
8.0
Prev. match
Context
6.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Burruchaga R.Kestelboim M.
Freshness·
91
—

Burruchaga R.: 5 days rest · 1 match, 18 games (7d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Medium-slowfavours grinders
SlowFast
Final
Ugo Carabelli C.[3]
Dellien Velasco M.
6-46-2
Cerundolo J.[1]
Guillen Meza A.[5]
3-66-16-4
Semi-finals
Dellien Velasco M.
Olivo R.
6-12-64-2
Ugo Carabelli C.[3]
Monteiro T.[1]
6-47-5
Cerundolo J.[1]
Habib H.[4]
7-646-4
Guillen Meza A.[5]
Mena F.[8]
3-66-36-3
Quarter-finals
Monteiro T.[1]
Sakamoto P.
6-16-4
Ugo Carabelli C.[3]
Oliveira G.
4-67-616-1
Dellien Velasco M.
Burruchaga R.[5]
6-22-66-4
Olivo R.
Cerundolo J.[6]
6-37-64
Guillen Meza A.[5]
Johns G.
6-24-66-3
Cerundolo J.[1]
Sakamoto P.[6]
6-46-3
Habib H.[4]
Prado Angelo J.
7-634-67-5
Mena F.[8]
Aboian L.
6-36-2
R16
Olivo R.
Comesana F.[2]
W/O
Monteiro T.[1]
Aboian V.
6-36-3
Sakamoto P.
Pucinelli De Almeida M.
5-76-06-4
Ugo Carabelli C.[3]
Prado Angelo J.
7-636-1
Oliveira G.
Olivieri G.[7]
6-46-2
Burruchaga R.[5]
Mager G.
7-6106-1
Dellien Velasco M.
Draxl L.
6-33-67-5
Cerundolo J.[6]
Boitan G.
6-36-1
Aboian L.
Collarini A.[3]
6-31-2
Cerundolo J.[1]
Pereira J.
6-47-5
Habib H.[4]
Soto M.
7-627-5
Mena F.[8]
Lingua Lavallen A.
6-27-5
Sakamoto P.[6]
Casanova H.
6-36-737-63
Prado Angelo J.
Olivo R.[7]
6-23-66-3
Guillen Meza A.[5]
Torres J.
7-56-726-1
Johns G.
Dellien Velasco M.[2]
0-66-47-64
R32
Ugo Carabelli C.[3]
Vallejo A.
7-6105-74-0
Aboian V.
Jubb P.
6-35-76-3
Comesana F.[2]
Sekulic P.
6-756-36-1
Boitan G.
Villanueva G.
6-06-3
Sakamoto P.
Cecchinato M.[8]
6-46-4
Monteiro T.[1]
Lavagno E.
6-26-2
Cerundolo J.[6]
Justo G.
6-36-2
Olivieri G.[7]
Passaro F.
6-26-2
Pucinelli De Almeida M.
Collarini A.
6-16-1
Prado Angelo J.
Gomez F.
6-46-0
Oliveira G.
Weis A.
6-36-3
Burruchaga R.[5]
Kestelboim M.
6-26-4
Mager G.
Bueno G.
6-16-1
Draxl L.
Bicknell B.
3-66-26-3
Dellien Velasco M.
Dellien H.[4]
7-56-1
Olivo R.
Torres J.
6-36-1
Cerundolo J.[1]
Midon L.
1-66-17-5
Pereira J.
Boscardin Dias P.
6-46-2
Lingua Lavallen A.
Villanueva G.
6-46-2
Mena F.[8]
Zanellato N.
7-666-1
Torres J.
Justo G.
7-56-1
Johns G.
Garcia R.
6-46-1
Dellien Velasco M.[2]
Barreto Sanchez D.
6-16-0
Casanova H.
Reis Da Silva J.
6-26-2
Sakamoto P.[6]
Aboian V.
7-656-766-4
Habib H.[4]
Pucinelli De Almeida M.
6-37-64
Soto M.
Schachter N.
3-66-36-3
Prado Angelo J.
Blanch D.
4-66-46-3
Olivo R.[7]
Cuellar Lorberg A.
6-26-2
Aboian L.
Blanch U.
7-656-4
Collarini A.[3]
Gomez E.
6-27-5
Guillen Meza A.[5]
Soriano Barrera A.
7-656-3