Daniel Masur vs Zizou Bergs — Lugano CH Semi-final

Lugano CH · CHALLENGER · Semi-final
Daniel Masur
GER
Daniel Masur
#386ATP
1413ELO
1383Hard ELO
31 yrs · 183 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLLLLLLWW
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 4 March 2024
hard
Zizou Bergs
BEL1
Zizou Bergs
#35ATP
1808ELO
1757Hard ELO
$995kYTD
$4.0MCAREER
27 yrs · 185 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWWWWWWWLL
Masur D.
6-2 6-4
Bergs Z.
Masur D.
662
Bergs Z.
240

Daniel Masur defeated Zizou Bergs 6-2 6-4 in the Lugano CH semi-final on hard. The upset overturned the form book — Zizou Bergs came in ranked #35, leading the head-to-head 1–0, defending last year's round of 32. Daniel Masur claimed a first win over Zizou Bergs in two meetings, narrowing the head-to-head to 1–1.

Key context

Head to head

0–1
DateTournamentRoundSurfaceWinnerScore
2022-09-19MetzQ1hardZizou Bergs7-6(3) 6-0

Serve vs return

This season
Masur D.serving80% hold

wins 63% of points on serve vs Bergs Z.

Bergs Z.serving82% hold

wins 64% of points on serve vs Masur D.

Even serve battle

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Serve & return on hard

Masur D.Bergs Z.
—
Serve
25
—
Return
40

Per-surface Serve / Return Rating (0–100, percentile within the hard field, opponent-adjusted over 52 weeks). About

Statistics

This season
Masur D.Bergs Z.
1st serve in·Even
62%
60%
1st serve points won·Even
70%
73%
2nd serve points won·Even
49%
52%
Service points won·Even
62%
64%
Return points won·Even
39%
38%
Break points saved·Even
59%
61%
Aces / match·Clear edge
5.3
6.9
Double faults / match·Slight edge
3.1
3.7

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (96 vs 156). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Masur D.Bergs Z.
Clutch Rating·Dominant
10
69
Break points saved·Clear edge
73
95
Break points won·Clear edge
5
21
Deciding sets·Dominant
15
92
Tiebreaks·Dominant
13
91

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Masur D.
2.6
Heavy underdogUmpiry Score
  • Extended break: 126 days (−1.5)
Bergs Z.
7.9
Dominant favouriteUmpiry Score
Form & Matchup
0.4Hard Elo 1383
Surface ELO
9.6+374 Hard Elo edge
0.1Overall Elo 1413
ELO gap
9.9Overall Elo 1808
0.0
H2H
10.0
4.0
Surface form
5.7
0.0Lost last 2
Win streak
0.0
Fatigue & Travel
Minutes 14d
8.2
3-set count
7.0
Prev. match
6.0
Context
6.0
Defending pts
6.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Masur D.Bergs Z.
Freshness·Clear edge
100
82

Masur D.: 15 days rest · Bergs Z.: 10 days rest · 3 matches (14d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Fastbig serves, short points
SlowFast
Final
Virtanen O.[2]
Masur D.
6-746-47-63
Semi-finals
Virtanen O.[2]
Molleker R.
6-16-3
Masur D.
Bergs Z.[1]
6-26-4
Quarter-finals
Masur D.
Albot R.[3]
7-607-64
Bergs Z.[1]
Kukushkin M.[5]
6-36-4
Molleker R.
Brouwer G.
6-47-64
Virtanen O.[2]
Herbert P.[6]
6-36-2
R16
Molleker R.
Choinski J.[8]
7-656-4
Bergs Z.[1]
Squire H.
7-656-2
Albot R.[3]
Ritschard A.
1-66-46-4
Herbert P.[6]
Escoffier A.
7-634-66-2
Kukushkin M.[5]
Harris B.
2-66-36-1
Masur D.
Gea A.
6-36-3
Brouwer G.
Blockx A.
6-36-1
Virtanen O.[2]
Ilkel C.
6-26-1
R32
Ilkel C.
Nikles J.
6-06-3
Herbert P.[6]
Shimizu Y.
6-34-66-1
Ritschard A.
Berankis R.
4-66-16-4
Molleker R.
Shimabukuro S.
6-46-4
Gea A.
Harris L.
6-46-3
Masur D.
Mpetshi Perricard G.[7]
6-46-4
Kukushkin M.[5]
Hsu Y.
6-26-2
Blockx A.
Riedi L.[4]
3-67-667-5
Bergs Z.[1]
Travaglia S.
6-26-3
Squire H.
Brunold M.
7-626-4
Harris B.
Bellucci M.
6-776-46-4
Albot R.[3]
Huesler M.
6-46-3
Choinski J.[8]
Wong C.
3-66-36-4
Brouwer G.
Blanchet U.
7-56-4
Escoffier A.
Yunchaokete B.
6-46-0
Virtanen O.[2]
Bertola R.
7-56-3