Juncheng Shang vs Facundo Bagnis — Indian Wells Masters Qualifying Round 2

Indian Wells Masters · ATP · Qualifying Round 2
CHN
Juncheng Shang
#274ATP
1746ELO
1698Hard ELO
21 yrs · 180 cm · Left-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLWLWWLWW
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 4 March 2024
hard
ARG
Facundo Bagnis
#431ATP
1591ELO
1513Hard ELO
36 yrs · 183 cm · Left-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLWWWLWWL
Shang J.
6-2 7-5
Bagnis F.
Shang J.
672
Bagnis F.
250

Juncheng Shang defeated Facundo Bagnis 6-2 7-5 in the Indian Wells Masters qualifying round 2 on hard.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Shang J.serving80% hold

wins 63% of points on serve vs Bagnis F.

Bagnis F.serving82% hold

wins 64% of points on serve vs Shang J.

Even serve battle

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Serve & return on hard

Shang J.Bagnis F.
34
Serve
—
18
Return
—

Per-surface Serve / Return Rating (0–100, percentile within the hard field, opponent-adjusted over 52 weeks). About

Statistics

This season
Shang J.Bagnis F.
1st serve in·Even
63%
64%
1st serve points won·Even
71%
69%
2nd serve points won·Even
53%
52%
Service points won·Even
64%
62%
Return points won·Even
37%
40%
Break points saved·Even
64%
63%
Aces / match·Even
4.5
4.1
Double faults / match·Even
2.3
2.4

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (90 vs 74). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Shang J.Bagnis F.
Clutch Rating·Clear edge
76
54
Break points saved·Even
96
92
Break points won·Slight edge
45
35
Deciding sets·Slight edge
94
89
Tiebreaks·Dominant
86
3

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Shang J.
7.0
Strong advantageUmpiry Score
Bagnis F.
5.6
Slight disadvantageUmpiry Score
Form & Matchup
7.3+186 Hard Elo edge
Surface ELO
2.7Hard Elo 1513
6.9Overall Elo 1746
ELO gap
3.1Overall Elo 1591
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
5.1
Surface form
3.8
0.0
Win streak
0.0
Fatigue & Travel
Minutes 14d
5.3
3-set count
4.0
6.0
Prev. match
4.0
Country comfort
5.0
Surface transition
6.0
Context
6.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Conditions

Court speed
Medium-slowfavours grinders
SlowFast
Weather
20°CClear
Wind 7 km/hHumidity 29%
Q2
Goffin D.[13]
Nardi L.[11]
7-645-76-4
Quinn E.
Vavassori A.[23]
4-66-16-2
Hong S.
Nagal S.[8]
2-66-27-64
Grenier H.
Molcan A.
6-36-2
Kudla D.
Nava E.[24]
6-26-4
Pouille L.
Mayot H.[22]
0-66-46-2
Klein L.
Svajda Z.
6-46-766-3
Moreno De Alboran N.
Rodionov J.[6]
6-34-66-3
Seyboth Wild T.[1]
Broady L.[20]
6-16-1
Mochizuki S.
Hassan B.
6-47-64
Lestienne C.[9]
Kopriva V.[14]
6-16-3
Shang J.
Bagnis F.
6-27-5
Q1
Nardi L.[11]
Atmane T.
6-46-0
Seyboth Wild T.[1]
Walton A.
6-16-3
Mayot H.[22]
Zhukayev B.
6-36-1
Vavassori A.[23]
Dzumhur D.
6-46-3
Bagnis F.
Mmoh M.[18]
3-66-46-4
Svajda Z.
Ajdukovic D.[17]
2-66-26-0
Kudla D.
Gaston H.[4]
6-16-3
Moreno De Alboran N.
Meligeni Alves F.[21]
6-36-1
Nava E.[24]
Johnson S.
6-767-6106-4
Grenier H.
Medjedovic H.[15]
6-16-1
Lestienne C.[9]
Ymer E.
6-47-67
Rodionov J.[6]
Gaio F.
6-16-2
Klein L.
Marterer M.[7]
6-26-4
Pouille L.
Hijikata R.[2]
5-76-16-3
Hassan B.
Cazaux A.[5]
6-46-4
Goffin D.[13]
Cressy M.
6-756-36-3
Hong S.
Kwon S.
6-36-3
Molcan A.
Paire B.[12]
7-656-3
Shang J.
Nishioka Y.[3]
4-67-6126-3
Broady L.[20]
Polmans M.
6-36-2
Quinn E.
Halys Q.[10]
6-17-5
Nagal S.[8]
Dostanic S.
6-26-2
Mochizuki S.
Schwartzman D.[16]
6-46-3