Juan Carlos Prado Angelo vs Federico Agustin Gomez — Santa Cruz De La Sierra CH Round of 32

Santa Cruz De La Sierra CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 32
Juan Carlos Prado Angelo
BOL
Juan Carlos Prado Angelo
#181ATP
1576ELO
1554Clay ELO
$163kYTD
$320kCAREER
21 yrs · 185 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
WLLLLWWWLL
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 4 March 2024
clay
ARG
Federico Agustin Gomez
#212ATP
1445ELO
1410Clay ELO
$29kYTD
$680kCAREER
29 yrs · 191 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
WLWLLLLLWL
Prado Angelo J.
6-4 6-0
Gomez F.
Prado Angelo J.
662
Gomez F.
400

Juan Carlos Prado Angelo defeated Federico Agustin Gomez 6-4 6-0 in the Santa Cruz De La Sierra CH round of 32 on clay. The result followed the form book — Juan Carlos Prado Angelo came in ranked #181, defending last year's round of 16.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Prado Angelo J.serving66% hold

wins 56% of points on serve vs Gomez F.

Gomez F.serving66% hold

wins 56% of points on serve vs Prado Angelo J.

Baseline battle — serve is shaky, expect plenty of breaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Prado Angelo J.Gomez F.
1st serve in·Even
60%
60%
1st serve points won·Slight edge
64%
70%
2nd serve points won·Even
50%
50%
Service points won·Even
58%
62%
Return points won·Even
42%
38%
Break points saved·Even
57%
60%
Aces / match·Clear edge
2.1
5.1
Double faults / match·Dominant
2.5
4.0

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (138 vs 151). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Prado Angelo J.Gomez F.
Clutch Rating·Slight edge
45
36
Break points saved·Dominant
40
82
Break points won·Clear edge
30
18
Deciding sets·Dominant
91
62
Tiebreaks·Dominant
64
16

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Prado Angelo J.
6.1
Even matchUmpiry Score
  • Extended break: 30 days (−0.3)
Gomez F.
5.2
Clear underdogUmpiry Score
  • Extended break: 28 days (−0.3)
Form & Matchup
6.6+144 Clay Elo edge
Surface ELO
3.4Clay Elo 1410
6.1Overall Elo 1576
ELO gap
3.9Overall Elo 1445
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
5.8
Surface form
5.5
Win streak
0.0
Fatigue & Travel
9.0
Prev. match
7.0
Context
6.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Prado Angelo J.Gomez F.
Freshness·Dominant
80
55

Prado Angelo J.: 1 day rest · 2 matches, 37 games (7d) · Gomez F.: 1 day rest · 3 matches, 91 games (7d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Medium-slowfavours grinders
SlowFast
Final
Ugo Carabelli C.[3]
Dellien Velasco M.
6-46-2
Cerundolo J.[1]
Guillen Meza A.[5]
3-66-16-4
Semi-finals
Dellien Velasco M.
Olivo R.
6-12-64-2
Ugo Carabelli C.[3]
Monteiro T.[1]
6-47-5
Cerundolo J.[1]
Habib H.[4]
7-646-4
Guillen Meza A.[5]
Mena F.[8]
3-66-36-3
Quarter-finals
Monteiro T.[1]
Sakamoto P.
6-16-4
Ugo Carabelli C.[3]
Oliveira G.
4-67-616-1
Dellien Velasco M.
Burruchaga R.[5]
6-22-66-4
Olivo R.
Cerundolo J.[6]
6-37-64
Guillen Meza A.[5]
Johns G.
6-24-66-3
Cerundolo J.[1]
Sakamoto P.[6]
6-46-3
Habib H.[4]
Prado Angelo J.
7-634-67-5
Mena F.[8]
Aboian L.
6-36-2
R16
Olivo R.
Comesana F.[2]
W/O
Monteiro T.[1]
Aboian V.
6-36-3
Sakamoto P.
Pucinelli De Almeida M.
5-76-06-4
Ugo Carabelli C.[3]
Prado Angelo J.
7-636-1
Oliveira G.
Olivieri G.[7]
6-46-2
Burruchaga R.[5]
Mager G.
7-6106-1
Dellien Velasco M.
Draxl L.
6-33-67-5
Cerundolo J.[6]
Boitan G.
6-36-1
Aboian L.
Collarini A.[3]
6-31-2
Cerundolo J.[1]
Pereira J.
6-47-5
Habib H.[4]
Soto M.
7-627-5
Mena F.[8]
Lingua Lavallen A.
6-27-5
Sakamoto P.[6]
Casanova H.
6-36-737-63
Prado Angelo J.
Olivo R.[7]
6-23-66-3
Guillen Meza A.[5]
Torres J.
7-56-726-1
Johns G.
Dellien Velasco M.[2]
0-66-47-64
R32
Ugo Carabelli C.[3]
Vallejo A.
7-6105-74-0
Aboian V.
Jubb P.
6-35-76-3
Comesana F.[2]
Sekulic P.
6-756-36-1
Boitan G.
Villanueva G.
6-06-3
Sakamoto P.
Cecchinato M.[8]
6-46-4
Monteiro T.[1]
Lavagno E.
6-26-2
Cerundolo J.[6]
Justo G.
6-36-2
Olivieri G.[7]
Passaro F.
6-26-2
Pucinelli De Almeida M.
Collarini A.
6-16-1
Prado Angelo J.
Gomez F.
6-46-0
Oliveira G.
Weis A.
6-36-3
Burruchaga R.[5]
Kestelboim M.
6-26-4
Mager G.
Bueno G.
6-16-1
Draxl L.
Bicknell B.
3-66-26-3
Dellien Velasco M.
Dellien H.[4]
7-56-1
Olivo R.
Torres J.
6-36-1
Cerundolo J.[1]
Midon L.
1-66-17-5
Pereira J.
Boscardin Dias P.
6-46-2
Lingua Lavallen A.
Villanueva G.
6-46-2
Mena F.[8]
Zanellato N.
7-666-1
Torres J.
Justo G.
7-56-1
Johns G.
Garcia R.
6-46-1
Dellien Velasco M.[2]
Barreto Sanchez D.
6-16-0
Casanova H.
Reis Da Silva J.
6-26-2
Sakamoto P.[6]
Aboian V.
7-656-766-4
Habib H.[4]
Pucinelli De Almeida M.
6-37-64
Soto M.
Schachter N.
3-66-36-3
Prado Angelo J.
Blanch D.
4-66-46-3
Olivo R.[7]
Cuellar Lorberg A.
6-26-2
Aboian L.
Blanch U.
7-656-4
Collarini A.[3]
Gomez E.
6-27-5
Guillen Meza A.[5]
Soriano Barrera A.
7-656-3