Pedro Sakamoto vs Matheus Pucinelli De Almeida — Santa Cruz De La Sierra CH Round of 16

Santa Cruz De La Sierra CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 16
Pedro Sakamoto
BRA
Pedro Sakamoto
#496ATP
1281ELO
1266Clay ELO
33 yrs · 178 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLWWWLWLL
2 — 1
Sets
Monday, 4 March 2024
clay
Matheus Pucinelli De Almeida
BRA
Matheus Pucinelli De Almeida
#397ATP
1412ELO
1404Clay ELO
25 yrs · 183 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWWWWWWWLW
Sakamoto P.
5-7 6-0 6-4
Pucinelli De Almeida M.
Sakamoto P.
5662
Pucinelli De Almeida M.
7041

Pedro Sakamoto defeated Matheus Pucinelli De Almeida 5-7 6-0 6-4 in the Santa Cruz De La Sierra CH round of 16 on clay. The upset overturned the form book — Matheus Pucinelli De Almeida came in ranked #397, defending last year's round of 16.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Sakamoto P.serving56% hold

wins 53% of points on serve vs Pucinelli De Almeida M.

Pucinelli De Almeida M.serving70% hold

wins 58% of points on serve vs Sakamoto P.

Baseline battle — serve is shaky, expect plenty of breaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Sakamoto P.Pucinelli De Almeida M.
1st serve in·Even
62%
63%
1st serve points won·Even
65%
66%
2nd serve points won·Even
48%
50%
Service points won·Even
59%
60%
Return points won·Slight edge
38%
43%
Break points saved·Even
57%
58%
Aces / match·Slight edge
3.1
2.0
Double faults / match·Clear edge
1.8
2.9

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (90 vs 107). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Sakamoto P.Pucinelli De Almeida M.
Clutch Rating·Slight edge
13
5
Break points saved·Clear edge
48
36
Break points won·Clear edge
22
43
Deciding sets·Even
11
11
Tiebreaks·Dominant
57
1

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Sakamoto P.
5.1
Clear underdogUmpiry Score
  • Extended break: 35 days (−0.7)
Pucinelli De Almeida M.
5.1
Clear underdogUmpiry Score
  • Extended break: 35 days (−0.7)
Form & Matchup
4.1Clay Elo 1266
Surface ELO
5.9+138 Clay Elo edge
4.2Overall Elo 1281
ELO gap
5.8Overall Elo 1412
10.0No prior meetings
H2H
0.0
4.8
Surface form
5.6
0.0
Win streak
0.0
Context
7.0
Defending pts
6.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Sakamoto P.Pucinelli De Almeida M.
Freshness·Dominant
92
55

Sakamoto P.: 5 days rest · 1 match, 13 games (7d) · Pucinelli De Almeida M.: 2 days rest · 4 matches, 99 games (7d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Medium-slowfavours grinders
SlowFast
Final
Ugo Carabelli C.[3]
Dellien Velasco M.
6-46-2
Cerundolo J.[1]
Guillen Meza A.[5]
3-66-16-4
Semi-finals
Dellien Velasco M.
Olivo R.
6-12-64-2
Ugo Carabelli C.[3]
Monteiro T.[1]
6-47-5
Cerundolo J.[1]
Habib H.[4]
7-646-4
Guillen Meza A.[5]
Mena F.[8]
3-66-36-3
Quarter-finals
Monteiro T.[1]
Sakamoto P.
6-16-4
Ugo Carabelli C.[3]
Oliveira G.
4-67-616-1
Dellien Velasco M.
Burruchaga R.[5]
6-22-66-4
Olivo R.
Cerundolo J.[6]
6-37-64
Guillen Meza A.[5]
Johns G.
6-24-66-3
Cerundolo J.[1]
Sakamoto P.[6]
6-46-3
Habib H.[4]
Prado Angelo J.
7-634-67-5
Mena F.[8]
Aboian L.
6-36-2
R16
Olivo R.
Comesana F.[2]
W/O
Monteiro T.[1]
Aboian V.
6-36-3
Sakamoto P.
Pucinelli De Almeida M.
5-76-06-4
Ugo Carabelli C.[3]
Prado Angelo J.
7-636-1
Oliveira G.
Olivieri G.[7]
6-46-2
Burruchaga R.[5]
Mager G.
7-6106-1
Dellien Velasco M.
Draxl L.
6-33-67-5
Cerundolo J.[6]
Boitan G.
6-36-1
Aboian L.
Collarini A.[3]
6-31-2
Cerundolo J.[1]
Pereira J.
6-47-5
Habib H.[4]
Soto M.
7-627-5
Mena F.[8]
Lingua Lavallen A.
6-27-5
Sakamoto P.[6]
Casanova H.
6-36-737-63
Prado Angelo J.
Olivo R.[7]
6-23-66-3
Guillen Meza A.[5]
Torres J.
7-56-726-1
Johns G.
Dellien Velasco M.[2]
0-66-47-64
R32
Ugo Carabelli C.[3]
Vallejo A.
7-6105-74-0
Aboian V.
Jubb P.
6-35-76-3
Comesana F.[2]
Sekulic P.
6-756-36-1
Boitan G.
Villanueva G.
6-06-3
Sakamoto P.
Cecchinato M.[8]
6-46-4
Monteiro T.[1]
Lavagno E.
6-26-2
Cerundolo J.[6]
Justo G.
6-36-2
Olivieri G.[7]
Passaro F.
6-26-2
Pucinelli De Almeida M.
Collarini A.
6-16-1
Prado Angelo J.
Gomez F.
6-46-0
Oliveira G.
Weis A.
6-36-3
Burruchaga R.[5]
Kestelboim M.
6-26-4
Mager G.
Bueno G.
6-16-1
Draxl L.
Bicknell B.
3-66-26-3
Dellien Velasco M.
Dellien H.[4]
7-56-1
Olivo R.
Torres J.
6-36-1
Cerundolo J.[1]
Midon L.
1-66-17-5
Pereira J.
Boscardin Dias P.
6-46-2
Lingua Lavallen A.
Villanueva G.
6-46-2
Mena F.[8]
Zanellato N.
7-666-1
Torres J.
Justo G.
7-56-1
Johns G.
Garcia R.
6-46-1
Dellien Velasco M.[2]
Barreto Sanchez D.
6-16-0
Casanova H.
Reis Da Silva J.
6-26-2
Sakamoto P.[6]
Aboian V.
7-656-766-4
Habib H.[4]
Pucinelli De Almeida M.
6-37-64
Soto M.
Schachter N.
3-66-36-3
Prado Angelo J.
Blanch D.
4-66-46-3
Olivo R.[7]
Cuellar Lorberg A.
6-26-2
Aboian L.
Blanch U.
7-656-4
Collarini A.[3]
Gomez E.
6-27-5
Guillen Meza A.[5]
Soriano Barrera A.
7-656-3