Juan Pablo Paz vs Mohamed Safwat — Kigali 1 CH Round of 32

Kigali 1 CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 32
ARG
Juan Pablo Paz
#1785ATP
31 yrs · 173 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLLWWWLLW
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 26 February 2024
clay
EGY8
Mohamed Safwat
#1884ATP
35 yrs · 180 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWWLLWLLLW
Paz J.
7-6 6-1
Safwat M.
Paz J.
71162
Safwat M.
6910

Juan Pablo Paz defeated Mohamed Safwat 7-6 6-1 in the Kigali 1 CH round of 32 on clay.

Key context

  • Match story: Juan Pablo Paz came through a tight passage before pulling clear — 7–6 6–1.

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Paz J.serving73% hold

wins 59% of points on serve vs Safwat M.

Safwat M.serving76% hold

wins 61% of points on serve vs Paz J.

Even serve battle

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Paz J.Safwat M.
1st serve in·Slight edge
63%
54%
1st serve points won·Even
67%
71%
2nd serve points won·Even
47%
51%
Service points won·Even
60%
62%
Return points won·Even
37%
37%
Break points saved·Slight edge
57%
62%
Aces / match·Even
3.7
3.3
Double faults / match·Even
2.9
3.0

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (18 vs 20). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Paz J.Safwat M.
Clutch Rating·Slight edge
0
8
Break points saved·Dominant
32
64
Break points won·Clear edge
24
2
Deciding sets·Slight edge
11
17
Tiebreaks·Clear edge
9
21

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Paz J.
4.1
Heavy underdogUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
  • Extended break: 49 days (−0.7)
Safwat M.
6.2
Even matchUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Form & Matchup
0.0No prior meetings
H2H
10.0
3.0
Surface form
4.6
0.0Lost last 2
Win streak
0.0
Fatigue & Travel
Minutes 14d
7.0
Prev. match
8.0
Surface transition
6.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Conditions

Court speed
Fastbig serves, short points
SlowFast
Final
Majchrzak K.
Trungelliti M.[4]
6-46-4
Semi-finals
Majchrzak K.
Houkes M.[7]
4-66-46-3
Trungelliti M.[4]
Kozlov S.
3-66-46-3
Quarter-finals
Majchrzak K.
Hemery C.[3]
7-56-3
Trungelliti M.[4]
Ionel N.[5]
6-36-2
Houkes M.[7]
Denolly C.
6-26-3
Kozlov S.
Oliel Y.
4-66-36-1
R16
Houkes M.[7]
Brown P.
6-46-4
Denolly C.
Pennaforti G.
1-67-626-2
Hemery C.[3]
Wenger D.
7-56-4
Majchrzak K.
Paz J.
6-36-0
Ionel N.[5]
Iradukunda G.
6-26-2
Trungelliti M.[4]
Voisin E.
6-17-5
Oliel Y.
Bouquet L.
6-43-66-3
Kozlov S.
Cukierman D.
7-56-747-65
R32
Houkes M.[7]
Ayeni O.
6-15-76-2
Kozlov S.
Tabur C.[2]
6-47-64
Bouquet L.
Lock B.[6]
4-67-626-3
Denolly C.
Casanova H.
7-627-5
Voisin E.
Ouakaa A.
6-26-1
Iradukunda G.
Brumm J.
3-66-47-63
Cukierman D.
Habiyambere E.
6-17-67
Ionel N.[5]
Sheehy J.
6-16-2
Majchrzak K.
Bobrov B.
6-36-2
Trungelliti M.[4]
Schachter N.
6-46-4
Wenger D.
Fantini L.
6-07-60
Pennaforti G.
Gakhov I.[1]
5-76-37-63
Brown P.
Dev S.
6-36-2
Hemery C.[3]
Pichler D.
6-26-3
Paz J.
Safwat M.[8]
7-696-1
Oliel Y.
Denisov I.
6-46-2