Marco Trungelliti vs Nicholas David Ionel — Kigali 1 CH Quarter-final

Kigali 1 CH · CHALLENGER · Quarter-final
Marco Trungelliti
ARG4
Marco Trungelliti
#99ATP
1627ELO
1621Clay ELO
$395kYTD
$2.6MCAREER
36 yrs · 178 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
WLLLWLWLWW
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 26 February 2024
clay
Nicholas David Ionel
ROU5
Nicholas David Ionel
#807ATP
23 yrs · 183 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLWWWLLLWL
Trungelliti M.
6-3 6-2
Ionel N.
Trungelliti M.
662
Ionel N.
320

Marco Trungelliti defeated Nicholas David Ionel 6-3 6-2 in the Kigali 1 CH quarter-final on clay. The result followed the form book — Marco Trungelliti came in ranked #99.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Trungelliti M.serving74% hold

wins 60% of points on serve vs Ionel N.

Ionel N.serving68% hold

wins 57% of points on serve vs Trungelliti M.

Serve advantage — Trungelliti M.

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Trungelliti M.Ionel N.
1st serve in·Clear edge
60%
72%
1st serve points won·Even
69%
65%
2nd serve points won·Even
50%
50%
Service points won·Even
61%
61%
Return points won·Even
40%
37%
Break points saved·Even
62%
59%
Aces / match·Clear edge
3.5
1.4
Double faults / match·Clear edge
3.4
2.5

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (177 vs 28). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Trungelliti M.Ionel N.
Clutch Rating·Dominant
50
3
Break points saved·Dominant
87
36
Break points won·Clear edge
24
41
Deciding sets·Dominant
87
6
Tiebreaks·Clear edge
19
6

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Trungelliti M.
3.8
Heavy underdogUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
  • Recent retirement (−1.5)
Ionel N.
4.8
Heavy underdogUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
  • Extended break: 23 days (−0.3)
Form & Matchup
0.0No prior meetings
H2H
10.0
3.7
Surface form
1.8
Win streak
0.0Lost last 6
Fatigue & Travel
6.2
Minutes 14d
4.0
3-set count
4.0
Prev. match
7.0
6.0
Surface transition
6.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Trungelliti M.Ionel N.
Freshness·
89
—

Trungelliti M.: 1 day rest · 1 match, 17 games (7d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Fastbig serves, short points
SlowFast
Final
Majchrzak K.
Trungelliti M.[4]
6-46-4
Semi-finals
Majchrzak K.
Houkes M.[7]
4-66-46-3
Trungelliti M.[4]
Kozlov S.
3-66-46-3
Quarter-finals
Majchrzak K.
Hemery C.[3]
7-56-3
Trungelliti M.[4]
Ionel N.[5]
6-36-2
Houkes M.[7]
Denolly C.
6-26-3
Kozlov S.
Oliel Y.
4-66-36-1
R16
Houkes M.[7]
Brown P.
6-46-4
Denolly C.
Pennaforti G.
1-67-626-2
Hemery C.[3]
Wenger D.
7-56-4
Majchrzak K.
Paz J.
6-36-0
Ionel N.[5]
Iradukunda G.
6-26-2
Trungelliti M.[4]
Voisin E.
6-17-5
Oliel Y.
Bouquet L.
6-43-66-3
Kozlov S.
Cukierman D.
7-56-747-65
R32
Houkes M.[7]
Ayeni O.
6-15-76-2
Kozlov S.
Tabur C.[2]
6-47-64
Bouquet L.
Lock B.[6]
4-67-626-3
Denolly C.
Casanova H.
7-627-5
Voisin E.
Ouakaa A.
6-26-1
Iradukunda G.
Brumm J.
3-66-47-63
Cukierman D.
Habiyambere E.
6-17-67
Ionel N.[5]
Sheehy J.
6-16-2
Majchrzak K.
Bobrov B.
6-36-2
Trungelliti M.[4]
Schachter N.
6-46-4
Wenger D.
Fantini L.
6-07-60
Pennaforti G.
Gakhov I.[1]
5-76-37-63
Brown P.
Dev S.
6-36-2
Hemery C.[3]
Pichler D.
6-26-3
Paz J.
Safwat M.[8]
7-696-1
Oliel Y.
Denisov I.
6-46-2