Gabriele Pennaforti vs Ivan Gakhov — Kigali 1 CH Round of 32

Kigali 1 CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 32
ITA
Gabriele Pennaforti
#792ATP
25 yrs · 191 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
WWLLLLWLWW
2 — 1
Sets
Monday, 26 February 2024
clay
Ivan Gakhov
RUS1
Ivan Gakhov
#388ATP
1430ELO
1384Clay ELO
29 yrs · 191 cm · Left-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLWLWLLLLW
Pennaforti G.
5-7 6-3 7-6
Gakhov I.
Pennaforti G.
56772
Gakhov I.
73631

Gabriele Pennaforti defeated Ivan Gakhov 5-7 6-3 7-6 in the Kigali 1 CH round of 32 on clay.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Pennaforti G.serving70% hold

wins 59% of points on serve vs Gakhov I.

Gakhov I.serving68% hold

wins 58% of points on serve vs Pennaforti G.

Baseline battle — serve is shaky, expect plenty of breaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Pennaforti G.Gakhov I.
1st serve in·Even
60%
60%
1st serve points won·Even
68%
69%
2nd serve points won·Even
48%
48%
Service points won·Even
60%
61%
Return points won·Even
40%
38%
Break points saved·Even
59%
62%
Aces / match·Slight edge
3.4
4.3
Double faults / match·Dominant
6.5
3.5

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (35 vs 127). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Pennaforti G.
4.2
Heavy underdogUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
  • Extended break: 175 days (−1.5)
Gakhov I.
4.2
Heavy underdogUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
  • Recent retirement (−1.5)
Form & Matchup
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
Surface form
3.9
0.0Lost last 2
Win streak
0.0Lost last 2
Fatigue & Travel
Surface transition
6.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Conditions

Court speed
Fastbig serves, short points
SlowFast
Final
Majchrzak K.
Trungelliti M.[4]
6-46-4
Semi-finals
Majchrzak K.
Houkes M.[7]
4-66-46-3
Trungelliti M.[4]
Kozlov S.
3-66-46-3
Quarter-finals
Majchrzak K.
Hemery C.[3]
7-56-3
Trungelliti M.[4]
Ionel N.[5]
6-36-2
Houkes M.[7]
Denolly C.
6-26-3
Kozlov S.
Oliel Y.
4-66-36-1
R16
Houkes M.[7]
Brown P.
6-46-4
Denolly C.
Pennaforti G.
1-67-626-2
Hemery C.[3]
Wenger D.
7-56-4
Majchrzak K.
Paz J.
6-36-0
Ionel N.[5]
Iradukunda G.
6-26-2
Trungelliti M.[4]
Voisin E.
6-17-5
Oliel Y.
Bouquet L.
6-43-66-3
Kozlov S.
Cukierman D.
7-56-747-65
R32
Houkes M.[7]
Ayeni O.
6-15-76-2
Kozlov S.
Tabur C.[2]
6-47-64
Bouquet L.
Lock B.[6]
4-67-626-3
Denolly C.
Casanova H.
7-627-5
Voisin E.
Ouakaa A.
6-26-1
Iradukunda G.
Brumm J.
3-66-47-63
Cukierman D.
Habiyambere E.
6-17-67
Ionel N.[5]
Sheehy J.
6-16-2
Majchrzak K.
Bobrov B.
6-36-2
Trungelliti M.[4]
Schachter N.
6-46-4
Wenger D.
Fantini L.
6-07-60
Pennaforti G.
Gakhov I.[1]
5-76-37-63
Brown P.
Dev S.
6-36-2
Hemery C.[3]
Pichler D.
6-26-3
Paz J.
Safwat M.[8]
7-696-1
Oliel Y.
Denisov I.
6-46-2