Damien Wenger vs Luca Fantini — Kigali 1 CH Round of 32

Kigali 1 CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 32
SUI
Damien Wenger
26 yrs · 173 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLLWWLLLL
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 26 February 2024
clay
ITA
Luca Fantini
#2071ATP
25 yrs · 178 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWWL
Wenger D.
6-0 7-6
Fantini L.
Wenger D.
6772
Fantini L.
0600

Damien Wenger defeated Luca Fantini 6-0 7-6 in the Kigali 1 CH round of 32 on clay.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Wenger D.serving65% hold

wins 56% of points on serve vs Fantini L.

Fantini L.serving72% hold

wins 59% of points on serve vs Wenger D.

Baseline battle — serve is shaky, expect plenty of breaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Wenger D.Fantini L.
1st serve in·Even
60%
64%
1st serve points won·Slight edge
64%
75%
2nd serve points won·Slight edge
49%
54%
Service points won·Slight edge
58%
67%
Return points won·Even
42%
39%
Break points saved·Slight edge
51%
60%
Aces / match·Slight edge
1.4
2.7
Double faults / match·Dominant
3.0
1.3

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (27 vs 3). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Wenger D.
5.9
Even matchUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
  • Extended break: 28 days (−0.3)
Fantini L.
4.0
Heavy underdogUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
  • Extended break: 462 days (−1.5)
Form & Matchup
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
6.5
Surface form
Win streak
0.0
Fatigue & Travel
7.0
Prev. match
Surface transition
6.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Conditions

Court speed
Fastbig serves, short points
SlowFast
Final
Majchrzak K.
Trungelliti M.[4]
6-46-4
Semi-finals
Majchrzak K.
Houkes M.[7]
4-66-46-3
Trungelliti M.[4]
Kozlov S.
3-66-46-3
Quarter-finals
Majchrzak K.
Hemery C.[3]
7-56-3
Trungelliti M.[4]
Ionel N.[5]
6-36-2
Houkes M.[7]
Denolly C.
6-26-3
Kozlov S.
Oliel Y.
4-66-36-1
R16
Houkes M.[7]
Brown P.
6-46-4
Denolly C.
Pennaforti G.
1-67-626-2
Hemery C.[3]
Wenger D.
7-56-4
Majchrzak K.
Paz J.
6-36-0
Ionel N.[5]
Iradukunda G.
6-26-2
Trungelliti M.[4]
Voisin E.
6-17-5
Oliel Y.
Bouquet L.
6-43-66-3
Kozlov S.
Cukierman D.
7-56-747-65
R32
Houkes M.[7]
Ayeni O.
6-15-76-2
Kozlov S.
Tabur C.[2]
6-47-64
Bouquet L.
Lock B.[6]
4-67-626-3
Denolly C.
Casanova H.
7-627-5
Voisin E.
Ouakaa A.
6-26-1
Iradukunda G.
Brumm J.
3-66-47-63
Cukierman D.
Habiyambere E.
6-17-67
Ionel N.[5]
Sheehy J.
6-16-2
Majchrzak K.
Bobrov B.
6-36-2
Trungelliti M.[4]
Schachter N.
6-46-4
Wenger D.
Fantini L.
6-07-60
Pennaforti G.
Gakhov I.[1]
5-76-37-63
Brown P.
Dev S.
6-36-2
Hemery C.[3]
Pichler D.
6-26-3
Paz J.
Safwat M.[8]
7-696-1
Oliel Y.
Denisov I.
6-46-2