Evgeny Donskoy vs Oliver Crawford — New Delhi CH Round of 32

New Delhi CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 32
RUS
Evgeny Donskoy
36 yrs · 185 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
WWLLWLWLLL
2 — 1
Sets
Monday, 26 February 2024
hard
Oliver Crawford
GBR5
Oliver Crawford
#235ATP
1444ELO
1413Hard ELO
27 yrs · 180 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
WLLWWWLWLL
Donskoy E.
6-2 2-6 6-2
Crawford O.
Donskoy E.
6262
Crawford O.
2621

Evgeny Donskoy defeated Oliver Crawford 6-2 2-6 6-2 in the New Delhi CH round of 32 on hard.

Key context

  • Match story: Evgeny Donskoy closed it out in three sets, 6–2 2–6 6–2.

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Donskoy E.serving85% hold

wins 66% of points on serve vs Crawford O.

Crawford O.serving85% hold

wins 66% of points on serve vs Donskoy E.

Serve-dominated — both hold easily, expect tiebreaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Donskoy E.Crawford O.
1st serve in·Even
59%
61%
1st serve points won·Even
72%
70%
2nd serve points won·Even
54%
53%
Service points won·Even
64%
63%
Return points won·Even
36%
37%
Break points saved·Even
61%
59%
Aces / match·Even
3.6
3.9
Double faults / match·Clear edge
1.8
3.0

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (29 vs 87). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Donskoy E.Crawford O.
Clutch Rating·Clear edge
25
12
Break points saved·Dominant
89
64
Break points won·Clear edge
5
18
Deciding sets·Slight edge
10
19
Tiebreaks·Dominant
65
10

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Donskoy E.
5.9
Even matchUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Crawford O.
6.3
Marginal edgeUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Form & Matchup
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
4.1
Surface form
6.0
Win streak
0.0Lost last 2
Fatigue & Travel
7.1
Minutes 14d
9.0
7.0
3-set count
7.0
Prev. match
8.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Conditions

Court speed
Medium-slowfavours grinders
SlowFast
Final
Blancaneaux G.
Wong C.
6-46-2
Semi-finals
Blancaneaux G.
Boyer T.
6-36-4
Wong C.
Shimizu Y.
7-656-4
Quarter-finals
Boyer T.
Svrcina D.[4]
7-627-61
Wong C.
Schoolkate T.
7-6106-3
Shimizu Y.
Dalla Valle E.
7-57-5
Blancaneaux G.
Sekulic P.
7-636-2
R16
Wong C.
Vacherot V.[3]
W/O
Blancaneaux G.
Walton A.[2]
6-36-0
Shimizu Y.
Bonzi B.[1]
7-56-4
Dalla Valle E.
Gaio F.[7]
7-656-1
Schoolkate T.
Oliveira G.[8]
6-37-64
Boyer T.
Sweeny D.
7-56-3
Svrcina D.[4]
Vincent Ruggeri S.
7-56-2
Sekulic P.
Donskoy E.
6-36-2
R32
Walton A.[2]
Onclin G.
6-46-0
Gaio F.[7]
Singh K.
3-66-36-4
Boyer T.
Hong S.[6]
6-36-727-67
Sweeny D.
Kasnikowski M.
6-727-56-3
Oliveira G.[8]
Hsu Y.
6-32-66-4
Donskoy E.
Crawford O.[5]
6-22-66-2
Vacherot V.[3]
Forejtek J.
6-46-757-64
Dalla Valle E.
M Rifqi F.
6-46-2
Bonzi B.[1]
Couacaud E.
6-766-26-1
Shimizu Y.
Janvier M.
6-36-1
Wong C.
Mukund S.
6-44-67-5
Schoolkate T.
Ramanathan R.
6-36-2
Vincent Ruggeri S.
Vishwakarma S.
6-46-2
Svrcina D.[4]
Tomic B.
6-36-4
Sekulic P.
Wu T.
6-36-3
Blancaneaux G.
Echargui M.
6-32-66-3