Camila Osorio vs Alize Cornet — Austin Round of 32

Austin · WTA · Round of 32
Camila Osorio
COL
Camila Osorio
#68WTA
1807ELO
1780Hard ELO
24 yrs · 162 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLLWWLWWL
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 26 February 2024
hard
FRA
Alize Cornet
36 yrs · 173 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLWWLLLLWW
Osorio C.
6-3 6-2
Cornet A.
Osorio C.
662
Cornet A.
320

Camila Osorio defeated Alize Cornet 6-3 6-2 in the Austin round of 32 on hard. The result followed the form book — Camila Osorio came in leading the head-to-head 1–0. Camila Osorio extended the head-to-head to 2–0.

Key context

Head to head

1–0
DateTournamentRoundSurfaceWinnerScore
2023-01-30LyonR32hardCamila Osorio6-4 4-6 6-1

Serve vs return

This season
Osorio C.serving69% hold

wins 58% of points on serve vs Cornet A.

Cornet A.serving55% hold

wins 52% of points on serve vs Osorio C.

Baseline battle — serve is shaky, expect plenty of breaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Serve & return on hard

Osorio C.Cornet A.
10
Serve
—
62
Return
—

Per-surface Serve / Return Rating (0–100, percentile within the hard field, opponent-adjusted over 52 weeks). About

Statistics

This season
Osorio C.Cornet A.
1st serve in·Even
65%
61%
1st serve points won·Even
61%
60%
2nd serve points won·Even
42%
43%
Service points won·Even
55%
53%
Return points won·Even
47%
43%
Break points saved·Even
53%
55%
Aces / match·Even
1.6
1.7
Double faults / match·Slight edge
5.4
5.1

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (123 vs 30). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Osorio C.Cornet A.
Clutch Rating·Dominant
84
53
Break points saved·Clear edge
73
57
Break points won·Clear edge
99
83
Deciding sets·Clear edge
96
74
Tiebreaks·Dominant
84
47

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Osorio C.
5.6
Slight disadvantageUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
  • Extended break: 42 days (−0.7)
Cornet A.
5.6
Slight disadvantageUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Form & Matchup
10.0
H2H
0.0
5.9
Surface form
3.8
0.0Lost last 2
Win streak
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Osorio C.Cornet A.
Freshness·
93
—

Osorio C.: 9 days rest · 2 matches (14d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Medium-fastrewards aggression
SlowFast

Draw

Final
Yuan Y.[8]
Wang X.[6]
6-47-64
Semi-finals
Wang X.[6]
Kalinina A.[1]
6-37-64
Yuan Y.[8]
Schmiedlova A.
6-06-3
Quarter-finals
Wang X.[6]
Collins D.[3]
6-2
Schmiedlova A.
Sevastova A.
4-61-2
Kalinina A.[1]
Parry D.[5]
1-66-46-2
Yuan Y.[8]
Wang Y.
6-37-5
R16
Parry D.[5]
Rakhimova K.
6-36-3
Collins D.[3]
Volynets K.
4-67-636-0
Schmiedlova A.
Vickery S.
5-77-657-5
Yuan Y.[8]
Townsend T.
6-37-65
Wang X.[6]
Semenistaja D.
6-16-2
Wang Y.
Arango E.
6-26-2
Kalinina A.[1]
Osorio C.
6-16-2
Sevastova A.
Stephens S.[2]
6-36-2
R32
Sevastova A.
Riera J.
6-46-3
Parry D.[5]
Ponchet J.
6-37-64
Arango E.
Parks A.
6-26-3
Osorio C.
Cornet A.
6-36-2
Rakhimova K.
Wickmayer Y.
6-36-747-65
Volynets K.
Zarazua R.
6-47-66
Wang X.[6]
Podoroska N.
7-56-4
Townsend T.
Contreras Gomez F.
3-66-26-3
Wang Y.
Bronzetti L.[4]
7-656-4
Schmiedlova A.
Stearns P.[7]
6-24-67-5
Kalinina A.[1]
Bejlek S.
6-36-2
Yuan Y.[8]
Rodionova A.
3-66-36-1
Stephens S.[2]
Martincova T.
6-46-0
Collins D.[3]
Gadecki O.
7-56-3
Semenistaja D.
Jimenez Kasintseva V.
6-726-26-4
Vickery S.
Marino R.
6-26-4