Gijs Brouwer vs Dino Prizmic — Lille CH Round of 32

Lille CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 32
Gijs Brouwer
NED
Gijs Brouwer
#1115ATP
30 yrs · 191 cm · Left-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLWLLWLLL
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 26 February 2024
hard
Dino Prizmic
CRO
Dino Prizmic
#89ATP
1841ELO
1733Hard ELO
$530kYTD
$1.3MCAREER
20 yrs · 188 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLLWLWWWW
Brouwer G.
6-2 6-4
Prizmic D.
Brouwer G.
662
Prizmic D.
240

Gijs Brouwer defeated Dino Prizmic 6-2 6-4 in the Lille CH round of 32 on hard. The upset overturned the form book — Dino Prizmic came in ranked #89.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Brouwer G.serving74% hold

wins 60% of points on serve vs Prizmic D.

Prizmic D.serving83% hold

wins 65% of points on serve vs Brouwer G.

Serve advantage — Prizmic D.

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Serve & return on hard

Brouwer G.Prizmic D.
—
Serve
34
—
Return
20

Per-surface Serve / Return Rating (0–100, percentile within the hard field, opponent-adjusted over 52 weeks). About

Statistics

This season
Brouwer G.Prizmic D.
1st serve in·Slight edge
68%
60%
1st serve points won·Even
68%
71%
2nd serve points won·Even
49%
53%
Service points won·Even
62%
64%
Return points won·Even
38%
41%
Break points saved·Even
59%
62%
Aces / match·Even
4.0
4.0
Double faults / match·Clear edge
2.1
3.0

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (71 vs 121). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Brouwer G.Prizmic D.
Clutch Rating·Dominant
19
71
Break points saved·Even
92
92
Break points won·Dominant
6
64
Deciding sets·Dominant
22
92
Tiebreaks·Dominant
3
37

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Brouwer G.
5.9
Even matchUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Prizmic D.
6.3
Marginal edgeUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Form & Matchup
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
3.5
Surface form
5.9
0.0Lost last 2
Win streak
Fatigue & Travel
7.1
Minutes 14d
3.8
3-set count
0.0
9.0
Prev. match
6.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Brouwer G.Prizmic D.
Freshness·Slight edge
100
92

Brouwer G.: 20 days rest · Prizmic D.: 11 days rest · 2 matches (14d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Medium-fastrewards aggression
SlowFast
Final
Rinderknech A.[1]
De Loore J.
6-43-67-68
Semi-finals
Rinderknech A.[1]
Virtanen O.
6-44-66-2
De Loore J.
Herbert P.
7-56-4
Quarter-finals
Herbert P.
Mpetshi Perricard G.[8]
7-637-64
Rinderknech A.[1]
Harris B.
4-67-56-4
Virtanen O.
Barrere G.[5]
6-26-2
De Loore J.
Albot R.[6]
6-34-67-62
R16
De Loore J.
Droguet T.
7-637-62
Barrere G.[5]
Naw H.
7-52-1
Herbert P.
Lamasine T.
6-17-5
Virtanen O.
Blockx A.
6-16-4
Rinderknech A.[1]
Pouille L.
6-787-56-4
Harris B.
Hassan B.[7]
6-44-66-3
Albot R.[6]
Brouwer G.
7-56-2
Mpetshi Perricard G.[8]
Shimabukuro S.
6-47-5
R32
Harris B.
Gea A.
6-47-64
Shimabukuro S.
Bellucci M.
6-46-1
Herbert P.
Bouquier A.
6-46-4
Albot R.[6]
Lajal M.
6-26-756-3
Virtanen O.
Otte O.
6-43-66-1
Hassan B.[7]
Squire H.
6-737-686-3
Naw H.
Geerts M.
4-66-47-5
Rinderknech A.[1]
Riedi L.
6-46-4
Pouille L.
Harris L.
7-646-3
Blockx A.
Paire B.[3]
6-45-76-3
Barrere G.[5]
Kolar Z.
6-36-3
Brouwer G.
Prizmic D.
6-26-4
Droguet T.
Guinard M.
7-626-2
De Loore J.
Bergs Z.[4]
4-67-57-64
Mpetshi Perricard G.[8]
Choinski J.
6-31-66-1
Lamasine T.
Escoffier A.
7-697-5