Yafan Wang vs Emiliana Arango — Austin Round of 16

Austin · WTA · Round of 16
CHN
Yafan Wang
#350WTA
1704ELO
1673Hard ELO
32 yrs · 170 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLWLLWLLW
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 26 February 2024
hard
Emiliana Arango
COL
Emiliana Arango
#97WTA
1624ELO
1576Hard ELO
25 yrs · 172 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLLWWWLLL
Wang Y.
6-2 6-2
Arango E.
Wang Y.
662
Arango E.
220

Yafan Wang defeated Emiliana Arango 6-2 6-2 in the Austin round of 16 on hard. The result followed the form book — Yafan Wang came in leading the head-to-head 1–0. Yafan Wang extended the head-to-head to 2–0.

Key context

Head to head

1–0
DateTournamentRoundSurfaceWinnerScore
2021-04-05BogotaR32clayYafan Wang6-4 5-7 7-5

Serve vs return

This season
Wang Y.serving66% hold

wins 57% of points on serve vs Arango E.

Arango E.serving66% hold

wins 57% of points on serve vs Wang Y.

Baseline battle — serve is shaky, expect plenty of breaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Serve & return on hard

Wang Y.Arango E.
—
Serve
0
—
Return
62

Per-surface Serve / Return Rating (0–100, percentile within the hard field, opponent-adjusted over 52 weeks). About

Statistics

This season
Wang Y.Arango E.
1st serve in·Slight edge
61%
69%
1st serve points won·Slight edge
64%
57%
2nd serve points won·Even
46%
42%
Service points won·Even
57%
53%
Return points won·Even
42%
46%
Break points saved·Even
56%
53%
Aces / match·Clear edge
2.6
1.0
Double faults / match·Slight edge
3.1
3.7

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (63 vs 126). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Wang Y.Arango E.
Clutch Rating·Slight edge
51
57
Break points saved·Clear edge
76
56
Break points won·Clear edge
62
81
Deciding sets·Slight edge
65
70
Tiebreaks·Clear edge
55
75

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Wang Y.
6.1
Even matchUmpiry Score
  • Extended break: 28 days (−0.3)
Arango E.
5.6
Slight disadvantageUmpiry Score
Form & Matchup
6.1+97 Hard Elo edge
Surface ELO
3.9Hard Elo 1576
5.8Overall Elo 1704
ELO gap
4.2Overall Elo 1624
5.0
H2H
5.0
6.4
Surface form
4.0
Win streak
0.0
Fatigue & Travel
8.0
Prev. match
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Wang Y.Arango E.
Freshness·
—
88

Arango E.: 4 days rest · 2 matches, 33 games (7d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Medium-fastrewards aggression
SlowFast

Draw

Final
Yuan Y.[8]
Wang X.[6]
6-47-64
Semi-finals
Wang X.[6]
Kalinina A.[1]
6-37-64
Yuan Y.[8]
Schmiedlova A.
6-06-3
Quarter-finals
Wang X.[6]
Collins D.[3]
6-2
Schmiedlova A.
Sevastova A.
4-61-2
Kalinina A.[1]
Parry D.[5]
1-66-46-2
Yuan Y.[8]
Wang Y.
6-37-5
R16
Parry D.[5]
Rakhimova K.
6-36-3
Collins D.[3]
Volynets K.
4-67-636-0
Schmiedlova A.
Vickery S.
5-77-657-5
Yuan Y.[8]
Townsend T.
6-37-65
Wang X.[6]
Semenistaja D.
6-16-2
Wang Y.
Arango E.
6-26-2
Kalinina A.[1]
Osorio C.
6-16-2
Sevastova A.
Stephens S.[2]
6-36-2
R32
Sevastova A.
Riera J.
6-46-3
Parry D.[5]
Ponchet J.
6-37-64
Arango E.
Parks A.
6-26-3
Osorio C.
Cornet A.
6-36-2
Rakhimova K.
Wickmayer Y.
6-36-747-65
Volynets K.
Zarazua R.
6-47-66
Wang X.[6]
Podoroska N.
7-56-4
Townsend T.
Contreras Gomez F.
3-66-26-3
Wang Y.
Bronzetti L.[4]
7-656-4
Schmiedlova A.
Stearns P.[7]
6-24-67-5
Kalinina A.[1]
Bejlek S.
6-36-2
Yuan Y.[8]
Rodionova A.
3-66-36-1
Stephens S.[2]
Martincova T.
6-46-0
Collins D.[3]
Gadecki O.
7-56-3
Semenistaja D.
Jimenez Kasintseva V.
6-726-26-4
Vickery S.
Marino R.
6-26-4