Adam Walton vs Tung Lin Wu — Pune CH Round of 16

Pune CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 16
Adam Walton
AUS3
Adam Walton
#79ATP
1703ELO
1669Hard ELO
$499kYTD
$2.3MCAREER
27 yrs · 183 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWWWWLLWWW
2 — 1
Sets
Monday, 19 February 2024
hard
Tung Lin Wu
TPE
Tung Lin Wu
#329ATP
1406ELO
1376Hard ELO
28 yrs · 188 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLWLLLLLW
Walton A.
6-0 6-7 7-6
Wu T.
Walton A.
665772
Wu T.
077641

Adam Walton defeated Tung Lin Wu 6-0 6-7 7-6 in the Pune CH round of 16 on hard. The result followed the form book — Adam Walton came in ranked #79.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Walton A.serving83% hold

wins 65% of points on serve vs Wu T.

Wu T.serving83% hold

wins 65% of points on serve vs Walton A.

Serve-dominated — both hold easily, expect tiebreaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Serve & return on hard

Walton A.Wu T.
35
Serve
—
17
Return
—

Per-surface Serve / Return Rating (0–100, percentile within the hard field, opponent-adjusted over 52 weeks). About

Statistics

This season
Walton A.Wu T.
1st serve in·Slight edge
63%
68%
1st serve points won·Slight edge
73%
68%
2nd serve points won·Even
53%
52%
Service points won·Even
65%
63%
Return points won·Even
37%
39%
Break points saved·Even
63%
63%
Aces / match·Clear edge
6.2
3.8
Double faults / match·Even
1.9
1.7

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (200 vs 131). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Walton A.Wu T.
Clutch Rating·Dominant
65
10
Break points saved·Slight edge
95
84
Break points won·Clear edge
20
6
Deciding sets·Dominant
95
6
Tiebreaks·Dominant
70
4

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Walton A.
7.6
Dominant favouriteUmpiry Score
Wu T.
3.4
Heavy underdogUmpiry Score
  • Recent retirement (−1.5)
Form & Matchup
7.9+293 Hard Elo edge
Surface ELO
2.1Hard Elo 1376
7.9Overall Elo 1703
ELO gap
2.1Overall Elo 1406
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
7.8
Surface form
3.0
Win streak
0.0Lost last 3
Fatigue & Travel
1.0
Minutes 14d
8.7
4.0
3-set count
9.0
Prev. match
8.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Walton A.Wu T.
Freshness·Dominant
54
80

Walton A.: 2 days rest · 5 matches, 122 games (7d) · Wu T.: 1 day rest · 1 match, 16 games (7d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Fastbig serves, short points
SlowFast
Final
Vacherot V.[4]
Walton A.[3]
3-67-657-65
Semi-finals
Vacherot V.[4]
Sweeny D.[7]
4-66-26-4
Walton A.[3]
Ajdukovic D.[2]
7-57-66
Quarter-finals
Walton A.[3]
Mukund S.
W/O
Sweeny D.[7]
Kaliyanda Poonacha N.
4-66-27-63
Vacherot V.[4]
Couacaud E.
7-626-4
Ajdukovic D.[2]
Zakharov A.
6-46-3
R16
Couacaud E.
Svrcina D.[5]
6-45-74-1
Mukund S.
Gill F.
6-16-0
Kaliyanda Poonacha N.
Nagal S.[1]
6-46-3
Sweeny D.[7]
Kasnikowski M.
6-46-1
Vacherot V.[4]
Schoolkate T.
6-16-2
Walton A.[3]
Wu T.
6-06-757-64
Zakharov A.
Ramanathan R.
6-46-4
Ajdukovic D.[2]
Boyer T.
6-16-2
R32
Nagal S.[1]
Hsu Y.
7-666-4
Vacherot V.[4]
Pospisil V.
6-37-5
Ramanathan R.
Napolitano S.
7-657-65
Zakharov A.
Crawford O.[6]
7-646-3
Kaliyanda Poonacha N.
Oliveira G.
6-36-727-63
Sweeny D.[7]
Janvier M.
4-66-17-64
Gill F.
Wong C.
7-644-66-3
Wu T.
Onclin G.
7-656-756-3
Kasnikowski M.
Hong S.
6-46-2
Schoolkate T.
Blancaneaux G.
7-676-3
Couacaud E.
Tomic B.
6-46-2
Svrcina D.[5]
Sekulic P.
6-46-3
Mukund S.
Gaio F.[8]
6-36-2
Walton A.[3]
Collignon R.
7-616-2
Boyer T.
Roca Batalla O.
6-24-66-2
Ajdukovic D.[2]
Fanselow S.
5-77-616-3