Hazem Naw vs Lucas Poullain — Pau CH Qualifying Round 2

Pau CH · CHALLENGER · Qualifying Round 2
SYR10
Hazem Naw
#996ATP
26 yrs · 183 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLLLLWLWL
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 19 February 2024
hard
Lucas Poullain
FRA2
Lucas Poullain
#423ATP
1295ELO
1286Hard ELO
30 yrs · 175 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLWLWWWLWW
Naw H.
6-2 6-4
Poullain L.
Naw H.
662
Poullain L.
240

Hazem Naw defeated Lucas Poullain 6-2 6-4 in the Pau CH qualifying round 2 on hard.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Naw H.serving66% hold

wins 57% of points on serve vs Poullain L.

Poullain L.serving70% hold

wins 58% of points on serve vs Naw H.

Baseline battle — serve is shaky, expect plenty of breaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Naw H.Poullain L.
1st serve in·Even
63%
65%
1st serve points won·Even
67%
64%
2nd serve points won·Slight edge
46%
52%
Service points won·Even
59%
60%
Return points won·Even
41%
42%
Break points saved·Even
59%
55%
Aces / match·Slight edge
2.5
1.3
Double faults / match·Dominant
3.6
1.3

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (47 vs 84). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Naw H.
7.0
Strong advantageUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Poullain L.
6.1
Even matchUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Form & Matchup
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
7.9
Surface form
4.3
7.03-match win streak
Win streak
Fatigue & Travel
6.3
Minutes 14d
8.2
8.0
Prev. match
9.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Conditions

Court speed
Fastbig serves, short points
SlowFast
Q2
Naw H.[10]
Poullain L.[2]
6-26-4
Celikbilek A.[12]
Bertrand R.
4-66-06-3
Trotter J.
Strombachs R.[9]
6-47-5
Kirchheimer S.
De Schepper K.
6-726-37-64
Gerasimov E.[11]
Berankis R.[4]
7-56-4
Lamasine T.[6]
Bouquier A.
6-26-4
Q1
Trotter J.
Lajal M.[1]
6-46-4
Naw H.[10]
Nijboer R.
6-42-67-63
Bouquier A.
Copil M.[7]
6-47-63
Celikbilek A.[12]
Rivet M.
6-46-1
De Schepper K.
Geerts M.[8]
3-66-26-3
Strombachs R.[9]
Gautier A.
6-36-3
Bertrand R.
Kachmazov A.[5]
3-64-1
Poullain L.[2]
Haliak M.
6-16-3
Kirchheimer S.
Squire H.[3]
3-67-656-2
Berankis R.[4]
Peliwo F.
6-46-1
Gerasimov E.[11]
Dussin L.
4-66-36-3
Lamasine T.[6]
Bax F.
6-46-1