Felix Gill vs Coleman Wong — Pune CH Round of 32

Pune CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 32
GBR
Felix Gill
#216ATP
1499ELO
1504Hard ELO
24 yrs · 175 cm · Left-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWWLLLLWLL
2 — 1
Sets
Monday, 19 February 2024
hard
HKG
Coleman Wong
#111ATP
1602ELO
1593Hard ELO
$287kYTD
$1.2MCAREER
22 yrs · 191 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
WLLLLWLWLL
Gill F.
7-6 4-6 6-3
Wong C.
Gill F.
77462
Wong C.
64631

Felix Gill defeated Coleman Wong 7-6 4-6 6-3 in the Pune CH round of 32 on hard. The upset overturned the form book — Coleman Wong came in ranked #111.

Key context

  • Match story: Felix Gill closed it out in three sets, 7–6 4–6 6–3.

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Gill F.serving82% hold

wins 64% of points on serve vs Wong C.

Wong C.serving82% hold

wins 64% of points on serve vs Gill F.

Even serve battle

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Serve & return on hard

Gill F.Wong C.
—
Serve
37
—
Return
34

Per-surface Serve / Return Rating (0–100, percentile within the hard field, opponent-adjusted over 52 weeks). About

Statistics

This season
Gill F.Wong C.
1st serve in·Even
64%
61%
1st serve points won·Slight edge
68%
73%
2nd serve points won·Even
52%
50%
Service points won·Even
62%
64%
Return points won·Even
39%
37%
Break points saved·Even
61%
61%
Aces / match·Dominant
3.3
8.4
Double faults / match·Even
2.0
2.2

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (67 vs 177). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Gill F.Wong C.
Clutch Rating·Even
46
43
Break points saved·Clear edge
78
91
Break points won·Even
6
5
Deciding sets·Dominant
70
43
Tiebreaks·Clear edge
76
88

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Gill F.
5.7
Slight disadvantageUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Wong C.
7.1
Strong advantageUmpiry Score
Form & Matchup
3.0Hard Elo 1504
Surface ELO
7.0+89 Hard Elo edge
2.2Overall Elo 1499
ELO gap
7.8Overall Elo 1602
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
Surface form
6.0
Win streak
0.0
Fatigue & Travel
Minutes 14d
8.1
8.0
Prev. match
9.0
6.0
Surface transition
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Gill F.Wong C.
Freshness·Clear edge
73
89

Gill F.: 4 days rest · 3 matches, 79 games (7d) · Wong C.: 1 day rest · 1 match, 16 games (7d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Fastbig serves, short points
SlowFast
Final
Vacherot V.[4]
Walton A.[3]
3-67-657-65
Semi-finals
Vacherot V.[4]
Sweeny D.[7]
4-66-26-4
Walton A.[3]
Ajdukovic D.[2]
7-57-66
Quarter-finals
Walton A.[3]
Mukund S.
W/O
Sweeny D.[7]
Kaliyanda Poonacha N.
4-66-27-63
Vacherot V.[4]
Couacaud E.
7-626-4
Ajdukovic D.[2]
Zakharov A.
6-46-3
R16
Couacaud E.
Svrcina D.[5]
6-45-74-1
Mukund S.
Gill F.
6-16-0
Kaliyanda Poonacha N.
Nagal S.[1]
6-46-3
Sweeny D.[7]
Kasnikowski M.
6-46-1
Vacherot V.[4]
Schoolkate T.
6-16-2
Walton A.[3]
Wu T.
6-06-757-64
Zakharov A.
Ramanathan R.
6-46-4
Ajdukovic D.[2]
Boyer T.
6-16-2
R32
Nagal S.[1]
Hsu Y.
7-666-4
Vacherot V.[4]
Pospisil V.
6-37-5
Ramanathan R.
Napolitano S.
7-657-65
Zakharov A.
Crawford O.[6]
7-646-3
Kaliyanda Poonacha N.
Oliveira G.
6-36-727-63
Sweeny D.[7]
Janvier M.
4-66-17-64
Gill F.
Wong C.
7-644-66-3
Wu T.
Onclin G.
7-656-756-3
Kasnikowski M.
Hong S.
6-46-2
Schoolkate T.
Blancaneaux G.
7-676-3
Couacaud E.
Tomic B.
6-46-2
Svrcina D.[5]
Sekulic P.
6-46-3
Mukund S.
Gaio F.[8]
6-36-2
Walton A.[3]
Collignon R.
7-616-2
Boyer T.
Roca Batalla O.
6-24-66-2
Ajdukovic D.[2]
Fanselow S.
5-77-616-3