Casper Ruud vs Nuno Borges — Los Cabos Quarter-final

Los Cabos · ATP · Quarter-final
Casper Ruud
NOR4
Casper Ruud
#12ATP
1983ELO
1889Hard ELO
$2.0MYTD
$29MCAREER
27 yrs · 183 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLWWWLWWWL
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 19 February 2024
hard
Nuno Borges
POR
Nuno Borges
#48ATP
1769ELO
1714Hard ELO
$811kYTD
$5.3MCAREER
29 yrs · 185 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLWWWLLWL
Ruud C.
6-3 6-2
Borges N.
Ruud C.
662
Borges N.
320

Casper Ruud defeated Nuno Borges 6-3 6-2 in the Los Cabos quarter-final on hard. The result followed the form book — Casper Ruud came in ranked #12. Casper Ruud extended the head-to-head to 2–1.

Key context

Head to head

1–1
DateTournamentRoundSurfaceWinnerScore
2025-07-27Canada MastersR32hardCasper Ruud7-5 6-4
2025-05-26Roland GarrosR64clayNuno Borges2-6 6-4 6-1 6-0
View full head-to-head →

Serve vs return

This season
Ruud C.serving88% hold

wins 68% of points on serve vs Borges N.

Borges N.serving85% hold

wins 66% of points on serve vs Ruud C.

Serve-dominated — both hold easily, expect tiebreaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Serve & return on hard

Ruud C.Borges N.
59
Serve
36
31
Return
16

Per-surface Serve / Return Rating (0–100, percentile within the hard field, opponent-adjusted over 52 weeks). About

Statistics

This season
Ruud C.Borges N.
1st serve in·Even
66%
64%
1st serve points won·Even
73%
71%
2nd serve points won·Even
54%
50%
Service points won·Even
66%
64%
Return points won·Even
37%
37%
Break points saved·Even
65%
62%
Aces / match·Even
6.0
5.8
Double faults / match·Slight edge
2.0
2.5

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (146 vs 142). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Ruud C.Borges N.
Clutch Rating·Clear edge
91
77
Break points saved·Even
99
98
Break points won·Clear edge
75
54
Deciding sets·Even
99
96
Tiebreaks·Dominant
97
71

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Ruud C.
7.5
Dominant favouriteUmpiry Score
Borges N.
5.9
Even matchUmpiry Score
Form & Matchup
7.2+175 Hard Elo edge
Surface ELO
2.8Hard Elo 1714
7.7Overall Elo 1983
ELO gap
2.3Overall Elo 1769
5.0
H2H
5.0
7.5
Surface form
5.1
Win streak
0.0
Fatigue & Travel
Minutes 14d
8.0
Prev. match
8.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Ruud C.Borges N.
Freshness·Slight edge
97
92

Ruud C.: 13 days rest · 1 match (14d) · Borges N.: 11 days rest · 2 matches (14d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Mediumbalanced pace
SlowFast
Final
Thompson J.[8]
Ruud C.[4]
6-37-64
Semi-finals
Thompson J.[8]
Zverev A.[1]
7-54-67-62
Ruud C.[4]
Tsitsipas S.[2]
6-47-64
Quarter-finals
Thompson J.[8]
Michelsen A.
0-67-617-5
Zverev A.[1]
Kokkinakis T.
6-36-4
Ruud C.[4]
Borges N.
6-36-2
Tsitsipas S.[2]
Kovacevic A.
7-616-3
R16
Ruud C.[4]
Giron M.
6-16-0
Kovacevic A.
Hijikata R.
6-34-66-4
Zverev A.[1]
Nishioka Y.
6-36-0
Kokkinakis T.
Evans D.
6-46-2
Michelsen A.
De Minaur A.[3]
6-46-1
Borges N.
Purcell M.[7]
6-36-3
Thompson J.[8]
Nava E.
7-656-3
Tsitsipas S.[2]
Vukic A.
6-36-0
R32
Vukic A.
Pacheco Mendez R.
7-657-610
Kovacevic A.
Holt B.
6-16-4
Giron M.
Daniel T.
6-47-5
Nishioka Y.
Cobolli F.
6-16-0
Michelsen A.
Lestienne C.
6-37-63
Purcell M.[7]
Arnaldi M.
6-44-66-4
Kokkinakis T.
Draper J.
4-67-656-4
Evans D.
Safiullin R.[5]
6-26-4
Nava E.
Schwartzman D.
6-46-3
Thompson J.[8]
Escobedo E.
6-46-3
Borges N.
Koepfer D.
7-626-2
Hijikata R.
Kecmanovic M.[6]
6-37-62