Matteo Gigante vs Adrian Andreev — Tenerife 2 CH Round of 16

Tenerife 2 CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 16
Matteo Gigante
ITA
Matteo Gigante
#526ATP
1592ELO
1534Hard ELO
24 yrs · 180 cm · Left-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLWLLWLLL
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 19 February 2024
hard
BUL
Adrian Andreev
#1122ATP
25 yrs · 175 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLWLLLLLL
Gigante M.
6-4 6-3
Andreev A.
Gigante M.
662
Andreev A.
430

Matteo Gigante defeated Adrian Andreev 6-4 6-3 in the Tenerife 2 CH round of 16 on hard. The result followed the form book — Matteo Gigante came in ranked #526, defending last year's round of 32.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Gigante M.serving74% hold

wins 60% of points on serve vs Andreev A.

Andreev A.serving72% hold

wins 59% of points on serve vs Gigante M.

Even serve battle

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Gigante M.Andreev A.
1st serve in·Even
61%
65%
1st serve points won·Even
69%
65%
2nd serve points won·Even
49%
50%
Service points won·Even
61%
60%
Return points won·Even
40%
40%
Break points saved·Even
59%
56%
Aces / match·Slight edge
4.0
2.6
Double faults / match·Dominant
3.9
1.3

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (109 vs 88). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Gigante M.Andreev A.
Clutch Rating·Clear edge
58
37
Break points saved·Dominant
78
53
Break points won·Clear edge
35
14
Deciding sets·Dominant
89
55
Tiebreaks·Dominant
54
94

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Gigante M.
6.4
Marginal edgeUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Andreev A.
6.7
Slight advantageUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Form & Matchup
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
6.1
Surface form
7.1
0.0Lost last 2
Win streak
Fatigue & Travel
9.0
Minutes 14d
5.7
8.0
Prev. match
9.0
Context
6.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Conditions

Court speed
Medium-slowfavours grinders
SlowFast
Final
Gigante M.
Travaglia S.
6-26-4
Semi-finals
Gigante M.
Maestrelli F.
6-06-4
Travaglia S.
Marie J.
6-26-3
Quarter-finals
Travaglia S.
Kovalik J.
7-53-63-0
Marie J.
Rocha H.
6-37-5
Maestrelli F.
Damm M.
7-646-2
Gigante M.
Caruso S.
6-31-66-2
R16
Gigante M.
Andreev A.
6-46-3
Maestrelli F.
Rodriguez Taverna S.[7]
6-26-4
Caruso S.
De Jong J.[2]
6-41-66-3
Rocha H.
Agamenone F.[8]
6-36-3
Kovalik J.
Kuzmanov D.
4-67-647-5
Damm M.
Moro Canas A.
2-66-36-2
Marie J.
Novak D.
6-36-3
Travaglia S.
Brancaccio R.
6-16-4
R32
Moro Canas A.
Llamas Ruiz P.[3]
7-55-76-1
Caruso S.
Krueger M.
6-44-67-5
Andreev A.
Fonio G.
4-66-37-5
Novak D.
Galarneau A.
3-67-56-4
Rocha H.
Rincon D.
3-67-626-3
Agamenone F.[8]
Diez S.
7-53-66-2
Travaglia S.
Bonadio R.
6-13-66-2
De Jong J.[2]
Holmgren A.
2-66-46-3
Rodriguez Taverna S.[7]
Landaluce M.
7-52-67-611
Brancaccio R.
Neumayer L.
3-66-37-5
Marie J.
Piros Z.[1]
7-626-1
Kuzmanov D.
Misolic F.[4]
6-37-63
Kovalik J.
Zusman R.
7-656-4
Maestrelli F.
Jorda Sanchis D.
6-36-4
Damm M.
Michalski D.
7-57-63
Gigante M.
Giannessi A.
6-26-3