Sumit Nagal vs Adam Walton — Bengaluru CH Quarter-final

Bengaluru CH · CHALLENGER · Quarter-final
Sumit Nagal
IND2
Sumit Nagal
#241ATP
1543ELO
1476Hard ELO
28 yrs · 178 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
WLWWWWWLLL
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 12 February 2024
hard
Adam Walton
AUS5
Adam Walton
#79ATP
1703ELO
1669Hard ELO
$499kYTD
$2.3MCAREER
27 yrs · 183 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWWWWLLWWW
Nagal S.
7-5 6-2
Walton A.
Nagal S.
762
Walton A.
520

Sumit Nagal defeated Adam Walton 7-5 6-2 in the Bengaluru CH quarter-final on hard. The upset overturned the form book — Adam Walton came in ranked #79, but Sumit Nagal had arrived on a 6-match winning run.

Key context

  • Match story: Sumit Nagal closed it out in two sets, 7–5 6–2.

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Nagal S.serving78% hold

wins 62% of points on serve vs Walton A.

Walton A.serving82% hold

wins 64% of points on serve vs Nagal S.

Even serve battle

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Serve & return on hard

Nagal S.Walton A.
—
Serve
35
—
Return
17

Per-surface Serve / Return Rating (0–100, percentile within the hard field, opponent-adjusted over 52 weeks). About

Statistics

This season
Nagal S.Walton A.
1st serve in·Slight edge
70%
63%
1st serve points won·Slight edge
64%
73%
2nd serve points won·Even
50%
53%
Service points won·Slight edge
60%
66%
Return points won·Even
41%
37%
Break points saved·Even
59%
62%
Aces / match·Dominant
1.5
6.2
Double faults / match·Even
2.0
1.9

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (145 vs 200). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Nagal S.Walton A.
Clutch Rating·Dominant
33
65
Break points saved·Dominant
69
95
Break points won·Clear edge
35
20
Deciding sets·Dominant
16
95
Tiebreaks·Clear edge
84
70

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Nagal S.
6.7
Slight advantageUmpiry Score
Walton A.
7.6
Dominant favouriteUmpiry Score
Form & Matchup
2.7Hard Elo 1476
Surface ELO
7.3+193 Hard Elo edge
2.7Overall Elo 1543
ELO gap
7.3Overall Elo 1703
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
9.2
Surface form
8.4
9.06-match win streak
Win streak
9.05-match win streak
Fatigue & Travel
5.3
Minutes 14d
2.1
3-set count
4.0
8.0
Prev. match
8.0
Context
6.0
Defending pts
5.0
Opponent rise
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Nagal S.Walton A.
Freshness·Dominant
96
54

Nagal S.: 8 days rest · 1 match (14d) · Walton A.: 2 days rest · 5 matches, 122 games (7d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Medium-fastrewards aggression
SlowFast
Final
Napolitano S.[7]
Hong S.[9]
4-66-36-3
Semi-finals
Napolitano S.[7]
Nagal S.[2]
7-626-4
Hong S.[9]
Roca Batalla O.[8]
6-23-66-3
Quarter-finals
Napolitano S.[7]
Echargui M.
6-756-46-4
Roca Batalla O.[8]
Kasnikowski M.
7-654-67-5
Hong S.[9]
Ramanathan R.
7-55-76-4
Nagal S.[2]
Walton A.[5]
7-56-2
R16
Roca Batalla O.[8]
Boyer T.
7-56-3
Nagal S.[2]
Wong C.
6-27-5
Kasnikowski M.
Bonzi B.[4]
6-36-4
Ramanathan R.
Nardi L.[1]
1-66-46-4
Napolitano S.[7]
Pospisil V.
6-44-66-4
Hong S.[9]
Zakharov A.
6-47-5
Echargui M.
Dalla Valle E.
6-26-2
Walton A.[5]
Onclin G.
6-26-2
R32
Zakharov A.
Vincent Ruggeri S.
6-27-5
Hong S.[9]
Schoolkate T.
6-46-3
Wong C.
Collignon R.
6-47-64
Nardi L.[1]
Added D.
3-66-37-60
Kasnikowski M.
Wu T.
7-56-2
Roca Batalla O.[8]
Tseng C.
7-56-3
Nagal S.[2]
Blancaneaux G.
6-26-2
Pospisil V.
Vanshelboim E.
7-623-66-4
Bonzi B.[4]
Sekulic P.
6-36-2
Ramanathan R.
Janvier M.
6-747-56-4
Boyer T.
Tomic B.
3-66-36-3
Napolitano S.[7]
Sweeny D.
6-36-3
Dalla Valle E.
Donskoy E.
6-27-5
Echargui M.
Ajdukovic D.[3]
6-26-4
Walton A.[5]
Dev S.
6-36-0
Onclin G.
Fonio G.
6-41-67-65