Mikhail Kukushkin vs Alexander Ritschard — Manama CH Round of 16

Manama CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 16
Mikhail Kukushkin
KAZ
Mikhail Kukushkin
#316ATP
1552ELO
1526Hard ELO
38 yrs · 183 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLWLLWLWL
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 12 February 2024
hard
SUI
Alexander Ritschard
#575ATP
1528ELO
1454Hard ELO
32 yrs · 193 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
WWLWLWWLWL
Kukushkin M.
6-4 6-4
Ritschard A.
Kukushkin M.
662
Ritschard A.
440

Mikhail Kukushkin defeated Alexander Ritschard 6-4 6-4 in the Manama CH round of 16 on hard.

Key context

  • Match story: Mikhail Kukushkin edged a tight contest from start to finish — 6–4 6–4.

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Kukushkin M.serving74% hold

wins 60% of points on serve vs Ritschard A.

Ritschard A.serving80% hold

wins 63% of points on serve vs Kukushkin M.

Serve advantage — Ritschard A.

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Kukushkin M.Ritschard A.
1st serve in·Slight edge
66%
60%
1st serve points won·Even
68%
69%
2nd serve points won·Even
53%
50%
Service points won·Even
63%
62%
Return points won·Even
38%
42%
Break points saved·Even
60%
62%
Aces / match·Even
2.9
2.6
Double faults / match·Dominant
1.0
3.6

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (164 vs 100). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Kukushkin M.Ritschard A.
Clutch Rating·Slight edge
46
36
Break points saved·Slight edge
93
84
Break points won·Dominant
41
14
Deciding sets·Even
41
40
Tiebreaks·Clear edge
44
60

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Kukushkin M.
6.5
Marginal edgeUmpiry Score
Ritschard A.
6.1
Even matchUmpiry Score
Form & Matchup
6.0+71 Hard Elo edge
Surface ELO
4.0Hard Elo 1454
5.5Overall Elo 1552
ELO gap
4.5Overall Elo 1528
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
5.1
Surface form
6.7
7.03-match win streak
Win streak
0.0
Fatigue & Travel
4.0
Minutes 14d
7.8
7.0
3-set count
7.0
8.0
Prev. match
7.0
7.0
Surface transition
7.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Conditions

Court speed
Medium-fastrewards aggression
SlowFast
Final
Kukushkin M.
Gasquet R.[5]
7-656-4
Semi-finals
Gasquet R.[5]
Dzumhur D.[7]
6-37-64
Kukushkin M.
Mensik J.[4]
6-36-2
Quarter-finals
Mensik J.[4]
Trungelliti M.
6-32-1
Kukushkin M.
Shelbayh A.
6-46-4
Dzumhur D.[7]
Rincon D.
6-46-4
Gasquet R.[5]
Harris B.
5-76-16-2
R16
Mensik J.[4]
Fatic N.
6-16-4
Rincon D.
Lokoli L.
3-66-16-4
Harris B.
Elias G.
6-26-2
Gasquet R.[5]
Buldorini P.
7-56-3
Dzumhur D.[7]
Andreev A.
6-06-1
Trungelliti M.
Dougaz A.
7-56-757-5
Kukushkin M.
Ritschard A.
6-46-4
Shelbayh A.
Fognini F.[2]
3-67-656-0
R32
Rincon D.
Durasovic V.
6-41-67-5
Buldorini P.
Peniston R.
2-4
Harris B.
Oconnell C.[1]
7-660-0
Fatic N.
Oliveira G.
7-637-65
Trungelliti M.
Klein L.[6]
6-43-66-3
Mensik J.[4]
Basilashvili N.
6-36-4
Kukushkin M.
Svrcina D.
6-26-2
Lokoli L.
Kopriva V.[3]
6-16-4
Dzumhur D.[7]
Giannessi A.
6-36-1
Elias G.
Ilkel C.
3-66-17-66
Gasquet R.[5]
Huesler M.
6-36-4
Andreev A.
Virtanen O.
6-16-2
Dougaz A.
Molleker R.
6-36-1
Ritschard A.
Ymer E.[8]
6-26-4
Shelbayh A.
Kovalik J.
7-646-3
Fognini F.[2]
Qaed Y.
6-16-1