Hazem Naw vs Zdenek Kolar — Cherbourg CH Round of 32

Cherbourg CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 32
SYR
Hazem Naw
#996ATP
26 yrs · 183 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLLLLWLWL
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 12 February 2024
hard
Zdenek Kolar
CZE
Zdenek Kolar
#153ATP
1506ELO
1432Hard ELO
$121kYTD
$1.3MCAREER
29 yrs · 183 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLLWWLLLW
Naw H.
6-4 6-2
Kolar Z.
Naw H.
662
Kolar Z.
420

Hazem Naw defeated Zdenek Kolar 6-4 6-2 in the Cherbourg CH round of 32 on hard.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Naw H.serving68% hold

wins 57% of points on serve vs Kolar Z.

Kolar Z.serving72% hold

wins 59% of points on serve vs Naw H.

Serve advantage — Kolar Z.

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Naw H.Kolar Z.
1st serve in·Even
63%
64%
1st serve points won·Even
67%
67%
2nd serve points won·Even
47%
50%
Service points won·Even
59%
61%
Return points won·Even
41%
41%
Break points saved·Even
59%
59%
Aces / match·Even
2.5
2.1
Double faults / match·Slight edge
3.6
3.3

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (47 vs 125). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Naw H.
7.0
Strong advantageUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Kolar Z.
5.6
Slight disadvantageUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Form & Matchup
10.0No prior meetings
H2H
0.0
7.6
Surface form
4.3
7.04-match win streak
Win streak
0.0
Fatigue & Travel
3.7
Minutes 14d
4.2
4.0
3-set count
7.0
7.0
Prev. match
6.0
Surface transition
7.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Naw H.Kolar Z.
Freshness·
—
90

Kolar Z.: 5 days rest · 1 match, 19 games (7d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Fastbig serves, short points
SlowFast
Final
Piros Z.[4]
Martineau M.
6-36-4
Semi-finals
Martineau M.
Geerts M.
7-56-4
Piros Z.[4]
Halys Q.[2]
7-656-3
Quarter-finals
Geerts M.
Lajal M.
6-16-3
Piros Z.[4]
Vylegzhanin N.
6-44-66-4
Martineau M.
Kachmazov A.
6-26-4
Halys Q.[2]
Droguet T.[5]
7-54-66-3
R16
Geerts M.
Nakashima B.[1]
6-46-4
Lajal M.
Poullain L.
7-656-1
Halys Q.[2]
Naw H.
6-37-63
Piros Z.[4]
Bellucci M.
6-37-5
Martineau M.
Paire B.[3]
6-16-4
Kachmazov A.
Lamasine T.
6-36-4
Vylegzhanin N.
Marie J.
1-66-36-2
Droguet T.[5]
Berankis R.
6-26-3
R32
Nakashima B.[1]
Royer V.
6-46-4
Kachmazov A.
Gadamauri B.
7-52-66-2
Paire B.[3]
Mpetshi Perricard G.
7-56-4
Vylegzhanin N.
Damm M.
7-646-1
Halys Q.[2]
Galarneau A.
6-46-4
Piros Z.[4]
Rottoli L.
6-16-2
Geerts M.
Otte O.
6-756-36-4
Poullain L.
Copil M.
6-36-4
Lajal M.
Gautier A.
6-36-3
Martineau M.
Malige M.
6-23-66-1
Lamasine T.
Choinski J.[6]
6-43-67-63
Marie J.
Escoffier A.[8]
6-766-26-0
Bellucci M.
Giustino L.
7-616-3
Droguet T.[5]
Trotter J.
7-656-4
Berankis R.
Squire H.
6-34-67-5
Naw H.
Kolar Z.
6-46-2