Alibek Kachmazov vs Tristan Lamasine — Cherbourg CH Round of 16

Cherbourg CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 16
RUS
Alibek Kachmazov
#779ATP
1490ELO
1467Hard ELO
23 yrs · 185 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLLLLLWLL
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 12 February 2024
hard
FRA
Tristan Lamasine
#959ATP
33 yrs · 183 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
WWLWLLWWLL
Kachmazov A.
6-3 6-4
Lamasine T.
Kachmazov A.
662
Lamasine T.
340

Alibek Kachmazov defeated Tristan Lamasine 6-3 6-4 in the Cherbourg CH round of 16 on hard.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Kachmazov A.serving78% hold

wins 62% of points on serve vs Lamasine T.

Lamasine T.serving80% hold

wins 63% of points on serve vs Kachmazov A.

Even serve battle

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Kachmazov A.Lamasine T.
1st serve in·Slight edge
56%
62%
1st serve points won·Even
71%
69%
2nd serve points won·Even
51%
48%
Service points won·Even
62%
61%
Return points won·Even
37%
39%
Break points saved·Slight edge
62%
53%
Aces / match·Dominant
6.0
2.8
Double faults / match·Even
3.3
3.0

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (99 vs 68). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Kachmazov A.Lamasine T.
Clutch Rating·Dominant
49
21
Break points saved·Dominant
82
38
Break points won·Even
16
17
Deciding sets·Slight edge
61
51
Tiebreaks·Dominant
87
43

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Kachmazov A.
6.8
Slight advantageUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Lamasine T.
6.0
Even matchUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Form & Matchup
10.0No prior meetings
H2H
0.0
6.5
Surface form
6.5
0.0
Win streak
Fatigue & Travel
Minutes 14d
3.7
3-set count
4.0
7.0
Prev. match
7.0
Surface transition
7.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Conditions

Court speed
Fastbig serves, short points
SlowFast
Final
Piros Z.[4]
Martineau M.
6-36-4
Semi-finals
Martineau M.
Geerts M.
7-56-4
Piros Z.[4]
Halys Q.[2]
7-656-3
Quarter-finals
Geerts M.
Lajal M.
6-16-3
Piros Z.[4]
Vylegzhanin N.
6-44-66-4
Martineau M.
Kachmazov A.
6-26-4
Halys Q.[2]
Droguet T.[5]
7-54-66-3
R16
Geerts M.
Nakashima B.[1]
6-46-4
Lajal M.
Poullain L.
7-656-1
Halys Q.[2]
Naw H.
6-37-63
Piros Z.[4]
Bellucci M.
6-37-5
Martineau M.
Paire B.[3]
6-16-4
Kachmazov A.
Lamasine T.
6-36-4
Vylegzhanin N.
Marie J.
1-66-36-2
Droguet T.[5]
Berankis R.
6-26-3
R32
Nakashima B.[1]
Royer V.
6-46-4
Kachmazov A.
Gadamauri B.
7-52-66-2
Paire B.[3]
Mpetshi Perricard G.
7-56-4
Vylegzhanin N.
Damm M.
7-646-1
Halys Q.[2]
Galarneau A.
6-46-4
Piros Z.[4]
Rottoli L.
6-16-2
Geerts M.
Otte O.
6-756-36-4
Poullain L.
Copil M.
6-36-4
Lajal M.
Gautier A.
6-36-3
Martineau M.
Malige M.
6-23-66-1
Lamasine T.
Choinski J.[6]
6-43-67-63
Marie J.
Escoffier A.[8]
6-766-26-0
Bellucci M.
Giustino L.
7-616-3
Droguet T.[5]
Trotter J.
7-656-4
Berankis R.
Squire H.
6-34-67-5
Naw H.
Kolar Z.
6-46-2