Zsombor Piros vs Quentin Halys — Cherbourg CH Semi-final

Cherbourg CH · CHALLENGER · Semi-final
Zsombor Piros
HUN4
Zsombor Piros
#120ATP
1661ELO
1629Hard ELO
$145kYTD
$975kCAREER
26 yrs · 180 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
WWWWWWWWWW
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 12 February 2024
hard
Quentin Halys
FRA2
Quentin Halys
#90ATP
1707ELO
1677Hard ELO
$694kYTD
$5.4MCAREER
29 yrs · 191 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLWLLLWWL
Piros Z.
7-6 6-3
Halys Q.
Piros Z.
7762
Halys Q.
6530

Zsombor Piros defeated Quentin Halys 7-6 6-3 in the Cherbourg CH semi-final on hard. The upset overturned the form book — Quentin Halys came in ranked #90.

Key context

  • Match story: Zsombor Piros closed it out in two sets, 7–6 6–3.

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Piros Z.serving86% hold

wins 67% of points on serve vs Halys Q.

Halys Q.serving83% hold

wins 65% of points on serve vs Piros Z.

Serve-dominated — both hold easily, expect tiebreaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Serve & return on hard

Piros Z.Halys Q.
—
Serve
39
—
Return
26

Per-surface Serve / Return Rating (0–100, percentile within the hard field, opponent-adjusted over 52 weeks). About

Statistics

This season
Piros Z.Halys Q.
1st serve in·Even
59%
59%
1st serve points won·Slight edge
68%
78%
2nd serve points won·Even
53%
51%
Service points won·Slight edge
62%
67%
Return points won·Slight edge
41%
34%
Break points saved·Even
61%
65%
Aces / match·Dominant
3.0
10.8
Double faults / match·Clear edge
2.7
3.6

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (138 vs 158). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Piros Z.Halys Q.
Clutch Rating·Even
57
57
Break points saved·Clear edge
84
97
Break points won·Dominant
32
4
Deciding sets·Slight edge
85
75
Tiebreaks·Dominant
48
91

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Piros Z.
6.4
Marginal edgeUmpiry Score
Halys Q.
5.8
Slight disadvantageUmpiry Score
Form & Matchup
4.8Hard Elo 1629
Surface ELO
5.2+48 Hard Elo edge
5.2Overall Elo 1661
ELO gap
4.8Overall Elo 1707
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
5.2
Surface form
3.3
Win streak
0.0
Fatigue & Travel
9.2
Minutes 14d
8.4
9.0
Prev. match
9.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Piros Z.Halys Q.
Freshness·Dominant
54
93

Piros Z.: 2 days rest · 5 matches, 107 games (7d) · Halys Q.: 12 days rest · 2 matches (14d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Fastbig serves, short points
SlowFast
Final
Piros Z.[4]
Martineau M.
6-36-4
Semi-finals
Martineau M.
Geerts M.
7-56-4
Piros Z.[4]
Halys Q.[2]
7-656-3
Quarter-finals
Geerts M.
Lajal M.
6-16-3
Piros Z.[4]
Vylegzhanin N.
6-44-66-4
Martineau M.
Kachmazov A.
6-26-4
Halys Q.[2]
Droguet T.[5]
7-54-66-3
R16
Geerts M.
Nakashima B.[1]
6-46-4
Lajal M.
Poullain L.
7-656-1
Halys Q.[2]
Naw H.
6-37-63
Piros Z.[4]
Bellucci M.
6-37-5
Martineau M.
Paire B.[3]
6-16-4
Kachmazov A.
Lamasine T.
6-36-4
Vylegzhanin N.
Marie J.
1-66-36-2
Droguet T.[5]
Berankis R.
6-26-3
R32
Nakashima B.[1]
Royer V.
6-46-4
Kachmazov A.
Gadamauri B.
7-52-66-2
Paire B.[3]
Mpetshi Perricard G.
7-56-4
Vylegzhanin N.
Damm M.
7-646-1
Halys Q.[2]
Galarneau A.
6-46-4
Piros Z.[4]
Rottoli L.
6-16-2
Geerts M.
Otte O.
6-756-36-4
Poullain L.
Copil M.
6-36-4
Lajal M.
Gautier A.
6-36-3
Martineau M.
Malige M.
6-23-66-1
Lamasine T.
Choinski J.[6]
6-43-67-63
Marie J.
Escoffier A.[8]
6-766-26-0
Bellucci M.
Giustino L.
7-616-3
Droguet T.[5]
Trotter J.
7-656-4
Berankis R.
Squire H.
6-34-67-5
Naw H.
Kolar Z.
6-46-2